START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,357,006 people care about Politics

Colorado is Winning at Gun Control

Colorado is Winning at Gun Control

States’ rights advocates must be wondering what they got themselves into in Colorado right about now. With Congress unable to get anything done at all, let alone substantial progress on gun safety reform state legislatures are stepping in and passing their own reforms. In the case of New York, this kind of thing is to be expected. But substantive gun reform coming out of a libertarian-minded state like Colorado? That’s an entirely different story.

The Democratic-controlled Colorado House of Representatives recently approved a package of gun-safety reforms. The bills, which will now go before the Democratic-controlled Senate, require background checks for all gun purchases (to be paid for by applicants), a ban on ammunition magazines with more than 15 rounds and a measure to allow colleges in the state to ban concealed weapons on campus. Gov. John Hickenlooper (D) has said he supports the magazine limits and universal background checks but had not made up his mind on the college campus ban.

Opponents of the bill accused lawmakers of taking advantage of the tragedy of Newtown, Aurora and the thousands of other gun deaths that happen in this country to strip citizens of their Second Amendment rights. Of course. A gun grab. “This bill is taking advantage of a tragedy that’s out there to demonize law-abiding citizens who are exercising their Second Amendment rights, and using it as a way to generate $4 million to $5 million in increased taxes on these people,” said Rep. Brian DelGrosso, R-Loveland.

The issue is especially loaded for Colorado because Magpul Industries, an Erie-based maker of gun magazines, has threatened to leave the state if the bill limiting magazines to 15 rounds becomes law. An amendment to the law says manufacturers could still make high-capacity magazines for out-of-state sale, but that’s not good enough for opponents of the bill. Of course, nothing would be, would it?

Should these measures pass and become law, and there’s plenty of reason to think they will in some fashion, the first significant crack in the frontier-myth of masculinity and firearms will have been exposed and the narrative shifted. Gun evangelists, like their religious counterparts, may finally be on the retreat in the culture wars.

The extend to which the NRA and its minions have been caught flat-footed on the state fight is rather astonishing, unless of course you remember the November 2012 election and the level of disbelief Republicans had at just how badly they lost. Conservative ideologues pursued a states’ rights agenda in opposition to federal policies–like civil rights laws–they disliked and a conservative Supreme Court was all to happy to enable that pursuit. Now that state legislatures are turning more Democratic lets see if conservative enthusiasm for local control continues.

 

Related Stories:

White Masculinity’s Ties To Rape and Gun Culture

Gun Control Is Totally Racist Against Guns, Says Former NRA President

Senator Feinstein Promises Action on Gun Control. Can Congress Deliver?

 

Read more: , , ,

Photo from Mojave Desert via flickr.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

225 comments

+ add your own
3:40AM PDT on May 2, 2014

Colorado set of invasive laws which recently approved a bundle of gun-safety reforms.
best ammo types

7:42AM PDT on Apr 26, 2013

David K: Apparently they can fly and be let back into the country after a trip to Russia to pick up additional terror tactics and pointers since the Boston bomber was. Seems like a total failure of the alleged "security system" as practiced by Dear Leader Obama's inept bureaucracy. As to the check, apparently he got hi gun illegally and was also subject to MA gun laws that are some of the most strict in the country. No indication that the basis for trhe bombs contained anything currently illegal as so far reported. BTW, the form you fill out to purchase does ask about that status and the failure then would be the US government not populating the current insta-check database with the data. Your stats also fail to say how many people were prosecuted for violating other laws on those purchases.

12:15PM PDT on Apr 19, 2013

Colorado is an example of panic legislation. It is very poor set of intrusive laws that are not only unenforceable but foolish. While Colorado does have better than Canadian laws allowing people to defend them selves much still needs to be done. Repeal of all those laws would be a step in the right direction.
Too many people are ignorant of even where their food comes from. There is a large area to cover just in the metro Denver and environs and the law enforcement cannot get there is may rural outlying ares quickly.
TV and movies portray an unreal scene. After all they are not supposed to. Most people do not spend hours a week in gun skill training. But the fact that most young have never handled a gun is in itself a problem.

12:18PM PST on Feb 28, 2013

Getting back to the topic at hand, gun control, many Canadians own guns. We are quite happy with rifles and shotguns. If the gov't ever did decide to "enslave" the US, what good would their weapons be against tanks, planes, etc. or will they be the next thing on the Christmas list? Also, do you really think soldiers who are your neighbours, friends and "heroes" would obey orders to subjugate their own people which would include their own friends and family? The US isn't a gathering of disparate tribes (although sometimes I wonder) like the Congo where people would turn on their own is it? I just don't see why someone needs a gun that fire more than a dozen rounds tops.

12:11PM PST on Feb 28, 2013

Well said Josephine.The "chosen few" already rule the US. Some folks refuse to see it. eg, Koch Brs, GE, banks, all kinds of corporations.The American people don't rule anything in their own country in spite of what they may think & it's not due to Obama, Bush or anyone in particular because they were elected due to financial support by huge conglomerates. Nowhere else in the world do PRIVATE interests contribute so much to elections, MILLIONS to run for office in the US. Does that mean you or I could be elected? Absolutely not...never! Does anyone really believe these contributors did so for the good of the country? HA! They did for their own interests.Same with foreign invasions - financial gain & strategic control in areas of financial interests.Then they hide $$$ in offshore tax havens, pay a small % tax on what they can't hide & then bitch about it!So much for "Socialist dictators".They are fascist dictators.The dictionary definition of fascism, if one looks it up, fits the US to a "t".Dictators are dictators regardless of the categorization.

6:28PM PST on Feb 27, 2013

Robby C wrote: "I doubt true socialism would ever work in America. Here it would be a 'chosen few' ruling the masses under equivalent poverty- a dictator-type socialist state."

That's what we've been moving toward since the Reagan years. Although neither party is blameless in this regard, the GOP is far more culpable. There are a few people with most of the money, that's been given to them by years and years of tax cuts and loopholes, who are controlling the lobbyists in DC and from whose ranks our so-called representatives largely come from and return to - if they ever retire from "public service". Those people are making the decisions, and those people are very much in favor of keeping the vast amount of wealth in as few hands as possible. We'll never get to Socialism, not while pure greed is running rampant.

As far as 60 rounds per minute, you don't need to aim with that - just spray side-to-side. It's pretty easy to harm or kill a lot of people that way. No one needs to be able to fire off that many rounds that quickly.

4:23PM PST on Feb 27, 2013

Linda- I appreciate your comment. Unfortunately, I doubt true sociaslism would ever work in America. Here it would be a "chosen few" ruling the masses under equivalent poverty- a dictator-type socialist state. Look at Obama- just a few steps closer to dictator than GW. As for guns firing 60rds/min, that's a rate of fire & not that big of a deal. Accuracey at that rate is very unlikely by most shooters, w/out years of practice- something else altogether. Go fire a gun w/a light, short trigger & see how difficult it is to actually squeeze the trigger once a second & actually hit a milk jug or a 2'x2' paper target. The average person certainly can't do it for any length of time. 10 rds or so is about it, plus, again- accuracy is the key & even fewer could come close to that at such a rate of fire from a full-auto. It's been said that in war, somewhere near 600rds are often fired to get one kill shot (not counting snipers of course). So basically, full autos are used to sweep the enemy into retreat, or at to immobilize them, while the heavy artillery is pulled into place for the kill. But in regular self-defense, I've seen the Candian way.

This poor Candian guy had all kinds of trouble for defending himself against people fire-bombing his own home, despite the video footage he had of the attack. He STILL faced charges but it sounds like he was eventually aquitted, thankfully.

http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/01/20/man-faces-jail-after-protecting-home-from-m

4:18PM PST on Feb 27, 2013

Carla v.
11:20pm PST on Feb 25, 2013
Damn, I see I arrived just in time for the Wanda B show.


You have my most insincere sympathy. I understand that it is difficult to deal with someone using facts and reason when you bring an emotional appeal against inanimate objects which can be demonstrated faulty in numerous regards.

3:24PM PST on Feb 27, 2013

Linda M, I do wholeheartedly agree with you. Living in a Socialist country does have the benefits of a more secure life. For those that are unfamiliar with the real meaning of the term here is an explanation.

SOCIALISM..principle that the wealth and means of wealth of a country should be used for the benefit of the WHOLE community.

Many get hung up on the fact that - this means their personal wealth and taxes but it is not the case. "Wealth of a Country" actually means it's natural resources which belong to every citizen of that country and the taxes derived from that should go back to the citizens of that country. But big Corporations that exploit these "natural resources" want money to stay with them and actually pay very little in tax. The richest woman in the world is an Australian Mining magnate - not only does she object to paying taxes but she also objects to paying wages and now want's to bring in African workers because they work for cheaper rates. The Government don't really see a problem with this because Australia is sliding backwards on being a socialist government. So the next time you see your country being fracked to death - just ask yourself - how much is coming back to me and those communities. You will find very little and those Corporations just walk away from the mess they have created. The Governments and Corporations don't own the natural resources... YOU DO...

1:21PM PST on Feb 27, 2013

The answers are there, just need some common sense to replace the arrogant idealizum

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.