START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
1,253,783 people care about Women's Rights

Could a 72 Hour Waiting Period Actually End Abortion in Missouri?

Could a 72 Hour Waiting Period Actually End Abortion in Missouri?

There are only two states in the country that have 72 hour long waiting periods between an initial appointment for an abortion and when the procedure is done: Utah and South Dakota. Now, Missouri is considering extending their own 24 hour wait for an additional two days, and if they do, the change could potentially stop patients from seeking an abortion in the state all together.

SB 519, which has been prefiled by Republican state Senator David Sater, “Amends the current waiting period for having an abortion from 24 hours to 72 hours.” However, a three day long waiting period is no simple requirement for the pregnant people of Missouri seeking to terminate a pregnancy. Because Missouri has only one clinic in the entire state, located in St. Louis, the extended wait would require multiple trips to the clinic, hotel stays or rides back home, and could potentially push pregnant people into needing later abortions because many may need to wait as much as a week in order to fit in the two appointments.

This isn’t Sen. Sater’s first go at trying to cut off abortion access. The senator, who has a “100% prolife record,” was the sponsor of last year’s bill to ensure that pharmacists cannot be required to keep “abortion-inducing” drugs in stock. Of course, “abortion inducing” is in the eye of the beholder, as a number of anti-choice politicians consider even basic contraception to be a mini-abortion.

This proposed bill shows a subtle shift in tactics in the state and a new push to ban abortion without outright banning it. Although South Dakota and Utah also have extended waiting periods, neither state has clinics nearby to provide an alternative for abortion patients who can’t jump through the hoops that would be needed for a three day long wait.

For those in Missouri who need an abortion, it’s only another fifteen minutes across the river to a clinic in Granite City, Ill., where a three day waiting period doesn’t exist. If the choice is to make multiple trips or stay many nights in town, or to just make one slightly longer trip without the additional restrictions, the choice is pretty simple. Then, if it simply becomes that much more convenient to leave the state, the Missouri legislature will have accomplished what multiple states have been itching to do be the first to eliminate abortion access in the state all together.

For those who already use the Planned Parenthood clinic in St. Louis, simply trying to access that clinic is becoming a greater feat every day. The clinic has been under constant surveillance by Operation Rescue and a local anti-choice group known as Defenders of the Unborn. Their goal is to document any time an ambulance comes to the clinic, trying to film the incident and pull up medical records of the event to publish on their website.

The city has stopped allowing the groups to do FOIA requests on the ambulance calls, adding to anti-choice activists’ conviction that the city is “colluding” with the clinic to keep it open. The group still takes as many video recordings and photos as possible, leading to a heightened sense of tension and potential for violation of privacy at the St. Louis site.

Could a three day wait be the final hurdle that makes trying to get an abortion in Missouri just too much effort? If so, expect every other low clinic access state to follow suit.

Read more: , , , , ,

Photo credit: Thinkstock

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
12:08PM PST on Dec 20, 2013

No. It won't. Desperate women will once again be lured into unsafe clinics, simply because they're too poor to afford to wait for the legal one. If they're too poor to pay to wait 3 more-plus days, how does anyone possibly believe they can afford to raise a child they do not want?

6:59PM PST on Dec 11, 2013

Thanks for posting this

2:41PM PST on Dec 7, 2013

bad news for women there..

10:59AM PST on Dec 6, 2013


3:58AM PST on Dec 6, 2013

Thanks for sharing.

10:46PM PST on Dec 5, 2013

I couldn't even be bothered to read more than the first paragraph of this drivel. Can we women just decide what's best for our own bodies, minds and lives, please? PLEASE???

10:02PM PST on Dec 5, 2013

This article makes my blood boil too! Throw out the thugs!

7:05PM PST on Dec 5, 2013

Thanks for sharing

2:50PM PST on Dec 5, 2013

Another 72 hours of sticking noses where they don't belong. Again, just let woman make their own choices and let's move on already

2:44PM PST on Dec 5, 2013

It won't prevent abortions but it will make women want to vote for democrats. I just don't understand these people who want to legislate this kind of thing. I have a handicapped daughter born before Roe v Wade and I have had so many anti abortion people shake their fingers at me. Why?? Because they think I had a window in my womb and knew that she was going to be born retarded and I didn't prevent it. How was I supposed to prevent it?????

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

meet our writers

Beth Buczynski Beth is a freelance writer and editor living in the Rocky Mountain West. So far, Beth has lived in... more
ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.