START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good

Could Greenhouse Gases Be an Untapped Source of Energy?

Could Greenhouse Gases Be an Untapped Source of Energy?

Estimates suggest we produce around 21 billion tons of CO2 every year as a result of our use of coal, oil and natural gas, much of which is contributing to the impending global warming crisis. This has led to some scientists wondering if there is any way we could put CO2 to good use. The answer, it seems, might be a resounding “Yes.”

One team of researchers from Wetsus, the center for excellence for sustainable water technology in Leeuwarden in the Netherlands, believes it may be possible to use a combination of membranes and water to pull a current from CO2 – to, in effect, generate more power from our fuel waste product.

Publishing in the journal Environmental Science & Technology Letters, Bert Hamelers, Ph.D. and colleagues explain that the procedure is relatively simple.

The scientists set up a tank filled with water. On one side of the tank is a membrane that allows positively charged ions to pass through. On the other side is a second membrane that allows negatively charged ions through.

The scientists introduce an electrode into the set up and then pump carbon dioxide through the water. At this juncture it separates off the positive hydrogen ions from the negatively charged biocarbonate. Due to the fact that the membranes only allows one of the two kinds of ions through, an electric current moving from one side to the other is then gained.

Hamelers’ team estimates that if we were to harvest all the currently wasted carbon dioxide from homes and power plants, we could produce about 1,570 terawatts of extra electricity every year.

While it’s important to stress this wouldn’t get rid of the CO2 in our atmosphere, it wouldn’t of itself create any extra gas either, though admittedly creating the materials to generate the current might.

Nevertheless, this would mean that by employing the technique we would get more out of our current fossil fuel stores than we currently do, which in turn could in the long run cut down on net fossil fuel usage.

Moreover, it could mean that existing power plants that had previously thought they would have to scale up in order to meet demand would be provided the opportunity of generating more power from their current supply without much extra investment and, crucially, without having to expand.

“The energy is there,” researcher Bert Hamelers told NBC News. “Only you need a turbine to get it. The objective for us was to show that, yes, there is this source of energy and, yes, you can harvest it,” he added. “Of course you need a lot more technological development before this is a system that can be practiced.”

The next step for this new form of recycling will be to ascertain whether the process can remain effective (and cost-effective) when scaled up from a lab setting to separate CO2 at industrial scales.

Given we know that we need to cut back on fossil fuels, anything that can feed demand without inflating overall fossil fuel harvesting or use could be a benefit. However, there may be issues with this. The approach may give fossil fuel regulators cause to think that we can offset much of the damage done by fossil fuels by making these kinds of efficiency savings.

While it is true that a small amount of ground could be clawed back by employing this technique, and without wanting to minimize the potential benefits, this kind of approach alone will not even come close to answering our energy needs and does not meet concerns over fossil fuel usage, which we know is damaging our environment and pushing us ever closer to likely catastrophe.

That said, this innovative technique, along with similar ideas being researched into how we might generate electricity by mixing salt water and fresh water, could, if realized, give us a vital tool for satisfying our energy demand without further harming the planet or exacerbating existing man-made climate change.

Read more: , , , ,

Image credit: Thinkstock.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
7:15AM PDT on Aug 15, 2013

thanks for sharing

8:08AM PDT on Aug 3, 2013

Sounds promising. If they succeed, I pray they don't sell their plans to the highest bidder.

2:11PM PDT on Aug 2, 2013

We need to continue to use our minds and resources to clean up our environment. Big business needs to pay for this.

2:48PM PDT on Jul 31, 2013

I'll all for anything that uses waste gas rather than letting it passively build up.

1:39PM PDT on Jul 31, 2013

If only the energy market is to be separated from politics and the world domination game....

12:47AM PDT on Jul 31, 2013

interesting idea, thanks.

8:47PM PDT on Jul 30, 2013

I hope these smart people can accomplish this

8:32PM PDT on Jul 30, 2013

thanks for sharing

2:03PM PDT on Jul 30, 2013

Wouldn't this be a blessing, turning a negative into a positive.

1:06PM PDT on Jul 30, 2013

Wesley: When carbon dioxide dissolves in water it forms carbonic acid (H2CO3). Like all other acids in solution, this splits itself into ions, positive hydrogen ions and negative carbonate (CO3) or bicarbonate (HCO3), probably a mixture of the two but I don't know the proportions. It would matter to this process because carbonate ions have twice the electric charge of bicarbonate.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

These monsters who kill animals for trophies are the scum of the earth and no better than the poache…

BTW,the college is a gun free zone, lot of good that did.

meet our writers

Steve Williams Steve Williams is a passionate supporter of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) rights, human... more
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!