START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good

Destroying The Mojave Desert: The Dark Side Of Solar Power

  • 2 of 2

Shift In Federal Policy

What has opened the way for such a costly source of energy is the dramatic turn in federal policy. In 2005, the Bush administration established generous programs to reward renewable energy developers. The Obama administration continued the policy, offering $45 billion in federal tax credits, guaranteed loans and grants.

In California, former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger freed large solar plants from property tax and handed out $90 million in exemptions from sales and use taxes. Under Governor Jerry Brown, the state invested more than $70 million in clean energy research last year.

The Opposition?

Ironically, most of the opposition as come from the government, in the form of the National Park Service, which has voiced the strongest complaints about the scale and siting of solar projects. California’s desert parks: Joshua Tree, Death Valley and the Mojave National Preserve have the most acreage affected by the development.

The Department of Defense also has raised questions, the the Federal Aviation Administration has voiced concerns about the heat plume rising from the Ivanpah towers and about the installation’s possible radar interference.

Dennis Schramm, who retired last December as superintendent at Mojave National Preserve, found himself at odds with the Interior Department, his own parent agency, in defending the 900 species of plants and 300-plus species of animals in the preserve, especially the desert tortoise.

There are no easy answers here, but could it be that once again the Big Energy Companies are calling the shots? Meanwhile, I think I’ll take my desert hiking elsewhere.

Related Stories

Google Invests $168 Million In 392MW Mojave Desert Solar Thermal Plant

The Solar Power Funding Avalanche

9 Questions To Ask Before Buying Solar Panels

Photo Credit: iStock


  • 2 of 2

Read more: , , , , , , ,

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
5:17PM PDT on Jul 23, 2013

There is/are no such thing as an "Empty Space" not even in the desert. There are animals, plants and other organisms that live and need just about every inch and niche on the planet. And even if it is "just a bacterium or virus, it can still prove to be most vital. Just try and see if you could live without the bacterium living in your digestive track. Some of these just might prove to be capable of cleaning up the destruction of oil spills and other pollutions. I agree, we definitely need to move beyond fossil fuels to renewable, but we must be very careful. We don't want to jump from bad to worse. I'm sure that if we put our heads together, we can find a way to mitigate the damages that might be done, and save the desert environment.

2:41PM PDT on May 5, 2012

I second Cheryl B. It's a DESERT ! Licensed Tortoise Wranglers move the tortoises, and they can migrate back under the solar panels after construction.

In the desert, water is life. Solar panels provide shade and reduce evaporation. You'll see a boom in the variety of life underneath the solar panels after a few years.

Besides, should we allow the extinction of the Human Race to save the desert tortoises?

Fukashima is a radioactive time bomb and there are fools that want to build MORE nuclear plants. Coal fired power plants pump out global warming gasses and build up mountains of coal ash... and let's not forget the radioactivity released by burning coal.

And you seriously want to complain about building solar power plants in the da###d desert?

"such a costly source of energy "

That's IT. You have NO conception of the word "costly".

You are obviously nuts.

7:02PM PST on Feb 22, 2012

Portland. I like your idea that perhaps the solar panels may humidify the area so that there might be side benefits such as water for lawns, golf courses and swimming pools. But I think that" part of the problem. There is no more water on the planet. It just changes form. So while some of us insist on using more (for our swimming pool, lawn, golf course, producing bottled water, washing machines and car washes, others will have to do with less. The problem is compounded by tapping for natural gas, tracking and other industrial uses which pollute and contaminate our existing water supplies and natural environment in our ever increasing use of fossil fuels.

Incidentally, Japanese authorities have announced that its wrecked nuclear plant will be unsafe for workers for the next forty years. Imagine if one lived nearby.

11:47PM PST on Feb 19, 2012

The Mojave is a natural desert and has an extremely active ecosystem that has already been badly damaged by the extermination of the Coastal Texas Cane forests and the Central Texas mixed woodlands (that used to push water into the central 4 corners region)

That still does not make the few acres that are used as environmentally disastrous as even a small portion of Fossil Fuels

9:27AM PST on Feb 14, 2012

@ Karen L Have you considered that having fewer children might be a less destructive and “a better alternative to digging, fracking or shipping oil....not to mention wars that have spent so many lives for oil!”

1:19PM PST on Feb 13, 2012

I certainly agree with those that say there should be more private homes and businesses to host these panels rather than sticking them all out in the desert. But even the huge panels are a better alternative to digging, fracking or shipping oil....not to mention wars that have spent so many lives for oil!

11:20AM PST on Feb 13, 2012

can't they find an empty would think there are plenty in the desert

11:19AM PST on Feb 13, 2012

Industrial scale anything can be a problem. In my opinion solar is the best answer to our growing energy needs - plus conservation of course. But individual solar energy gathering on individual buildings and homes are the best answer. Senator Bernie Sanders (I) from Vermont has offered a bill that would encourage solar hot water heating on homes across America. Perhaps in the future there will be a better solar plan for large energy production but this project seems like it covers an awful lot of acreage in order to provide energy to 140,000 homes.

9:40AM PST on Feb 13, 2012

I pannelli solari dovrebbero essere solo posti sui tetti di case e fabbricati. Per terra non dovrebbero essere messi MAI.

9:39AM PST on Feb 13, 2012

To Rick G. Thank you for shedding some light on this desert situation. It really doesn't look like they "mowed a swath" of anything. You can go out into the deserts in some areas and see nothing but sage brush forever.

People need power that does not add to global warming. You can't have it both ways.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

The anti abortion people claim to be Christian, but they have no Biblical evidence to back up their stand.…

ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK


Civil Rights


Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights


Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!