START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
4,430,427 people care about Environment & Wildlife

EPA Cracks Down on Mountaintop Removal Mining

EPA Cracks Down on Mountaintop Removal Mining

On Tuesday the EPA announced a new water quality standard that would essentially put an end to mountaintop removal (MTR) coal mining, if properly implemented.

Nate Kharrl of EcoFactory describes the announcement best:

Under the new regulations, electrical conductivity of streams and rivers near mining operations will not be allowed to significantly increase. This measure, called salinity, reflects the metal and mineral content of the water. Because the massive amount of soil removed during surface mining is dumped in nearby “valley fills,” the streams that are smothered by the rock and soil waste are saturated with the naturally occurring metals and minerals exposed by the mining operation. Under the new EPA regulation, this practice of dumping mining waste into stream-laden valleys will be illegal.

As you can imagine, this is not making mining companies happy, despite an odd and unexplained jump in mining stocks.

This decision comes shortly after the announcement that the EPA was halting many permits that had previously been issued for MTR projects. They also proposed a veto of one: the Spruce No. 1 surface mine in West Virginia. Had this project gone forward, it would have been the largest mine ever approved in the area.

From the NY Times:

Arch Coal Inc.’s Spruce No. 1 mine would degrade surrounding water quality, fill more than 7 miles of headwater streams and affect more than 2,000 acres of forest, EPA said.

While we seem to be on the right track toward getting rid of mountaintop removal mining altogether, it is an incredibly difficult process to replace. Unfortunately, the alternative coal mining method is also incredibly dangerous and damaging, as demonstrated by Monday’s fatal methane blast in an underground coal mine, again in West Virginia.

What are your thoughts about coal mining? What are the alternatives, and how should the EPA get rid of it without damaging the economy? Should we find a way to make it cleaner, or move away from coal altogether? Let us know in the comments.

Sign the Care2 petition to support the EPA’s veto of the Spruce No. 1 mine.

Read more: , , , , , ,

photo credit: gov site

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
6:44AM PDT on Apr 19, 2010

Fully agree with what Nancy K said (quote)
"This should have happened long ago. There should be some sort of law that requires the owners of the corporations to live in the area where the production happens."

12:27AM PDT on Apr 18, 2010

Thank you

8:19AM PDT on Apr 17, 2010


11:12PM PDT on Apr 15, 2010

Help our earth.Thank you.

8:08PM PDT on Apr 15, 2010

Thank you.

7:28AM PDT on Apr 15, 2010


11:10AM PDT on Apr 14, 2010

This should have been done a long time ago.

7:56AM PDT on Apr 14, 2010

All for energy conservation & an eye on other possibilities which may be available & natural for certain environements! Good cause!

5:48AM PDT on Apr 14, 2010

This should have happened a long time ago...

2:52PM PDT on Apr 12, 2010

It is everyone's business to do this

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Greedy bosses. Minimum wages means; if they could pay you less they would! But it is against the law.…

ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK


Civil Rights


Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights


Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!