START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,315,888 people care about Politics

Failed Quick Deportation Program Quietly Shelved

Failed Quick Deportation Program Quietly Shelved

An immigration program which quickly deports undocumented immigrants from states like Arizona has been quietly shelved.

‘Stipulated removal’ removed thousands of people but because of flaws in how it was carried out, disregarding people’s rights, the program has effectively ended.  Ninety-six percent of those removed under the program did not have a lawyer,; the program was stopped for those without counsel.  Immigration officials have not deported a single illegal immigrant through the program in Arizona in over a year, Vincent Picard, a spokesman for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Phoenix told the Arizona Republic.

In September 2010 a federal appellate court ruled that the rights of an immigrant held in the Eloy detention center in Arizona were violated. After that, speedy removals were offered only to illegal immigrants with lawyers who could help them fight their cases.

With ‘Stipulated removal’, an immigrant gives up the right to a hearing and the right to an appeal. It is supposed to save time and money.

But a report released in September by the National Immigration Law Center accused officials of pressuring for quick deportation by threatening long detention stays and failing to provide adequate interpretation and translation.

Most – 80 percent – of those deported through the program hadn’t committed crimes.

“DHS agents administering the program provided legally inaccurate portrayals of the opportunities to remain in the United States in order to boost deportation numbers, even though judges and others involved in the program voiced their concerns about how the program short-circuited individuals’ rights,” the report says.

In one of the documents the report’s authors obtained through an FOI request, they found a Spanish-language script, apparently used by agents administrating the program, to convince immigrants to sign the stipulated order of removal. The script, replete with grammatical errors and legal inaccuracies, erroneously informs immigrants that the “only” way to “fix” their papers is through certain family relationships and openly discourages immigrants from taking their cases to court.

“This report confirms what attorneys working in detention centers have heard for years: non-citizens, especially those with limited English skills, are pressured into signing documents without being informed of the severe consequences of their actions,” said Karen Tumlin, managing attorney at the National Immigration Law Center and co-author of the report.

Undisclosed: potential permission to remain in US

Undocumented immigrants may have a right to remain, such as if they have lived in America for a long period of time, have no criminal record and have children born in the country.

Instead of deportation, the non-criminals also may have qualified for less-severe voluntary departure, which gives immigrants the chance to return to the US if they qualify for a green card, said Tumlin. Instead, by accepting ‘stipulated removal’, immigrants are generally barred from coming back to the U.S. for as long as 10 years and face felony charges for illegally re-entering the country.

Phillip Crawford, a former field director for ICE’s enforcement and removal operations in Arizona, told the Arizona Republic that it is a shame that the program had been curtailed.

He claimed it had several levels of “safeguards” to ensure that rights were protected and that participants understood what they were signing. Each case was reviewed by ICE officers during processing at detention centers, by ICE prosecutors and by an immigration judge who has the power to reject the deportation if the judge believed the immigrant had legal grounds to remain.

In September 2010, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that immigration officials at Eloy had violated the rights of Isaac Ramos. Ramos, an undocumented immigrant from Mexico with prior criminal convictions, had agreed to stipulated removal while being detained in Eloy in 2006. The court ruled that the government failed to make clear to Ramos that he was giving up his right to talk to a lawyer, who could have explained the process and the penalties. The court also ruled that the immigration judge who signed Ramos’ deportation order failed to determine if Ramos had agreed to stipulated removal “voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently,” as required.

Ramos, who is married to a legal permanent resident and has two U.S.-citizen children, had argued that he should be allowed to return to the U.S. since his rights to due process were violated. The court, however, denied that request.

Arizona now has a system called “prompt hearings.”

At a hearing anyone facing deportation is advised of their full array of rights and an Immigration judge confirms that they are aware of any possibility to legally remain in America.

 

Related stories:

Abused and Trafficked Women Losing Children Under Immigration Regime (Video)

Why Is a News Story Needed to Get an Immigrant Entrepreneur a Visa?

Immigration Officer: “The Warrant is Coming Out of My Balls”

Enhanced by Zemanta

Read more: , , , ,

Photo credit: Wikimedia

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

21 comments

+ add your own
9:21PM PST on Nov 4, 2012

Thank you for article.

9:21PM PST on Nov 4, 2012

Thank you for article.

1:51PM PST on Nov 13, 2011

Pray tell me, how can someone who is in this country ILLEGALLY have rights of any kind here?

9:44AM PST on Nov 13, 2011

We have no jobs to spare for newcomers. In fact we don't have jobs enough for ourselves.
1. Close the door to the world for economic mobility, temporarily at least, except for refugees/political asylum.
2. Start cutting our own natural increase, preferably without abortion.

12:13PM PST on Nov 10, 2011

~Interesting!~A simple solution to this problem won't be easy!!~

3:49AM PST on Nov 10, 2011

Thanks for the article.

10:15PM PST on Nov 9, 2011

We need law enforcement. If we can't enforce immigration law, how could we enforce a draft if we needed one? We couldn't.

10:44AM PST on Nov 8, 2011

hahahhahhaha YESSSS!!!!! I LOVE IT!!!!

STUPID FAILED SYSTEM!!!

6:49AM PST on Nov 8, 2011

How can we go on like this? We need to eliminate all illegal criminal aliens. They are all criminals as they broke the law to get here or stay here, and they continue to break the law by staying here, they break the law if they work here, they break the law if they use false ID or lie on documents, they break the law when they use our medical services without paying for it. They just are all criminals. Now, we do need immigrants and we do need employees, but they need to be documented and legal, and pay taxes and be responsible! If they are criminals why do we continue to coddle them and refuse to send them out of the country when we catch them breaking our laws????? We should prosecute anyone in the US who employs, houses or in any way assists these criminals in their pursuit of staying here illegally. No jobs or homes for illegals would mean they have no reason to be here! They would "self deport" and quit being criminals here.

6:41AM PST on Nov 8, 2011

I am a pretty hard core Liberal on most issues. I understand why they come here, hell I would too if I were in their shoes. At one point we could handle all who wanted to come but the simple fact is now we can't. We have set up quotas to immigrate and leagle means to come in and work tempararily.
We need to send people who entered illeagly home, I understand their plight but we have people from all over the world who wish to come here for the american dream and their shot is being hijacked by the onslaught of hispanics Reagan made 15,000,000 leagle with the stroke of a pen now we have almost that many again, Not this time, we need clear them out then draw a line in the sand and enforce it.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

meet our writers

Lindsay Spangler Lindsay Spangler is a Web Editor and Producer for Care2 Causes. A recent UCLA graduate, she lives in... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.