START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
926,450 people care about Women's Rights

Finally! Pentagon Will Lift Women In Combat Ban

Finally! Pentagon Will Lift Women In Combat Ban

Women have served in the front lines of the military for many years, but now, for the first time ever, they will actually be recognized for it.

Outgoing Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced Wednesday that he has decided the time for a fully inclusive military has come. Panetta and Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, are expected to formally announce the policy shift later, but the effect of the change will likely roll out incrementally. Each branch of the military must develop plans to open jobs in combat units like the infantry. From there it becomes a question of literally filling the ranks.

The move overturns a 1994 rule that bans women in combat. According to early reports, military services will have until January 2016 to seek any special exemptions for positions they believe should remain closed to women. Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), the chairman of the Armed Services Committee, issued a to-the-point statement endorsing the move. “I support it,” Levin said. “It reflects the reality of 21st century military operations.”

We don’t have to look any further than Congress to understand that women face nearly identical risks to men serving overseas. Rep. Tammy Duckworth (D-Il) lost both legs while serving in combat support. Yet like thousands of other women in the military, because of the 1994 ban, that role is not considered combat, which means women like Duckworth, while facing all the risks associated with military service, receive none of the benefits like increased pay and opportunity for promotion.

Carried over time, those restrictions amount to women being closed out of advancement in the single largest governmental employer. And when we talk about the need for military culture to change, that’s a need that is as much top-down as it is bottom-up. Yes, male infantry soldiers will have to see women as equal partners, just as they must see soldiers of color and their LGBT colleagues as equal partners as well. That’s a change that won’t happen just by serving with them, but by taking orders from them.

Lifting the combat ban has the potential to address another searing problem plaguing the military: sexual assault. Women soldiers face an epidemic of rape and sexual abuse by their superiors and fellow soldiers with very little aside from ongoing cover-ups being done about this problem. It’s hard not to hope for a sea-change in a culture that views women as expendable support staff and treats sexual assault and rape as a job hazard.

Now, an announcement of a policy shift alone will not makes these things happen. Nor will simply opening up job positions cause the military to magically transform into a panacea of equality. But. As we’ve seen with the advancements of African-Americans and Latinos in the military, the armed services does remain one of the last avenues for working poor to fight their way to the middle class. This avenue just opened up for thousands of women.

Even if very few women take advantage of it, so what? Even by removing the idea that women can’t become generals simply because of their gender, we’ve struck down one more pillar of discrimination that has artificially propped up our military ranks for far too long. And yes, just because more women may rise to leadership positions doesn’t mean the culture of the military will change or that a rape epidemic will end. But we can say for certain that without this important policy shift, our country can be guaranteed that needed change will not happen.

Related Stories:

Who Doesn’t The Tea Party Hate? Now It’s Military Families

Military Labels Rape Victims Crazy

Fox Pundit Says Women In The Military Should Expect To Be Raped

Read more: , , , ,

Photo from The U.S. Army via flickr.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

132 comments

+ add your own
1:44PM PDT on May 7, 2013

Linguistics was as close to the front lines as I could get. So glad we are one step closer to equality.

1:41PM PDT on May 7, 2013

Closest I could get to the front lines was Linguistics. I can't tell you how happy I am that we are one step closer to equality.

1:34PM PDT on May 7, 2013

progress. Some women aren't cut out for combat, nor are some men. However given the chance to prove themselves, some women will not only do well in combat, they will far exceed expectations. In the land of equality we are now FINALLY seeing some of that equality in action. Success :)

9:33AM PST on Feb 1, 2013

Grazie.

7:27PM PST on Jan 29, 2013

nice

6:07AM PST on Jan 29, 2013

Thanks for sharing.

5:05AM PST on Jan 29, 2013

ok. thanks

12:14AM PST on Jan 28, 2013

Continued:

The best male and female combat soldiers will blow the average combat soldier of either sex out of the water. And male and female alike, they will have weaknesses and strengths that will complement the weaknesses and strengths of the other members of their unit. Outside the pages of comic books and computer games, and action movies and their ilk, there is no such person as the perfect combat soldier.

12:12AM PST on Jan 28, 2013

It's a statement of the bleeding obvious that in any human, homogeneous culture the average adult male will be taller, heavier and stronger than the corresponding female. So what?

For example, I'm male by sex and inclination. I'm short, overweight and middle aged but still immensely fit compared to the typical, overweight fifty-year-old male eking out his twilight years of combat in the Australian army. At my local dojo, there are guys who are heavier and higher ranking judokas than me. They can beat me in an unarmed contest, no question. But because I’m shorter and lighter than them, I’m faster; I can run much further at a much higher average speed. I can do more press-ups more quickly. And pull-ups? Some of the strongest but heaviest guys can’t even do one!

Combat is a tricky art. It requires a detailed ergonomic analysis of the loads that have to be shifted, how quickly and how often, as well as of a plethora of other details. Big heavy guys tend to be able to shift a heavier load for a shorter time. But they often tire more quickly because they are heavier and so have to move their own mass as well as the external load. Some of the best combat soldiers in the world are, like the Ghurkhas, small, wiry and very fit.

What is completely irrelevant to a combat unit are trivia like lavatory and shower arrangements. Anyone who thinks that matters has no understanding whatsoever of the demands of modern combat.

The best male and female combat soldiers

5:41PM PST on Jan 27, 2013

It's too bad that "rape" stands in the way of a woman choosing to rise to higher ranks.
Men may be stronger physically, but when it comes to serving in the military, it should be up to the woman to choose & weigh the pros & cons. Hopefully the cons will outweigh the pros.
If a man in the military is so honorable to service his country, he may want to consider his
honor in treating a woman in the military honorable as well. Thanks for posting.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free
CONTACT THE EDITORS

Recent Comments from Causes

We must stop using all forms of plastics before it kills all ocean life - there ARE alternatives to plastics.…

Stop relying on oil and its products instead

Thats for sure Rhonda, thank you for sharing.

ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.