START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
3,408,762 people care about Animal Welfare

Finally, The Last State Without a Felony Animal Cruelty Law Proposes One

Finally, The Last State Without a Felony Animal Cruelty Law Proposes One

It’s 2014. Wouldn’t you expect by now that every single state in the U.S. would have a law on the books making the worst types of animal cruelty a felony? After all, some states got on board with this idea literally hundreds of years ago — Massachusetts, for example, which enacted the first such law in 1804.

Beginning in earnest in the 1980s, states began recognizing that certain crimes against animals demanded stronger penalties. One by one, each state added felony provisions to their regulations, until today only a single state is left without one. Which state? South Dakota.

Right now in South Dakota, no matter what horror you perpetrate against an animal, it’s nothing more than a misdemeanor. Fortunately, it looks like that may finally change this year.

What Took South Dakota So Long?

After years of resistance, in recognition of the persistent pressure exerted by state animal advocates and national groups like the Humane Society of the United States, the state began work to change its animal cruelty law in 2013.

So what was all the foot-dragging about? Not surprisingly, it was the influence and fears of the agriculture and livestock industry. If you have any doubt about how powerful this sector is in South Dakota, here’s a hint. With bipartisan support, in 2012 the state legislature passed a resolution that:

“…opposes any attempt for any ballot initiative or acts by the Humane Society of the United States, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, and other animal rights groups that would undermine the livelihood of agricultural producers.”

Not surprisingly, shortly thereafter in 2013, a state Senate committee rejected a bill which would have made aggravated cruelty against dogs, cats and horses a class 6 felony. Despite the fact that the bill specifically excluded farming and ranching practices, agricultural and livestock groups pressed hard to keep it from passing. They won.

What changed this time around? It appears both sides deemed compromise a better solution than continued all-out war.

“Battling that same argument every year in the legislative session gets old after a while,” Mike Held of the South Dakota Farm Bureau told the Huffington Post.

Ultimately, the livestock lobby decided it’s better to help pass a law it likes than wait to have animal activists force a statewide ballot initiative that they just might win.

“What it really comes down to is that the ag groups have taken charge of this,” State Veterinarian Dr. Dustin Oedekoven told the Huffington Post. “Instead of being on defense on the introduction of this type of legislation, they’ve decided to be at the table in drafting this legislation.”

According to Dr. Oedekoven, the proposed revisions will recognize that “for certain acts which I think all agree are terrible acts and we would agree a felony penalty would be appropriate. We’ve also been careful to clarify in general that standard accepted ag practices are not considered mistreatment or cruelty.”

Dairy cows connected to milking machines

Photo credit: Thinkstock

Ah, those standard agricultural practices. Animal advocates believe many of those factory farming procedures are every bit as cruel as any felony-level mistreatment committed against a dog or cat. The livestock industry doesn’t agree. Therein lies the reason for its absolute rejection so far of any effort to regulate the treatment of animals.

While it’s a little worrisome that the livestock industry helped write this update to the law, it’s undoubtedly true that any version drafted without their close involvement would be doomed.

A group called South Dakotans Fighting Animal Cruelty (SDFACT) has spent the past several years trying to yank South Dakota into the 21st century on the issue of animal laws. Late in 2013, SDFACT convinced state Senator Shantel Krebs to set up a meeting with Dr. Oedekoven and the state Department of Agriculture. This maneuver broke the logjam and got compromise efforts moving.

SDFACT secured a seat at the negotiation table to help write South Dakota’s proposed new law. Representing the livestock industry was the South Dakota Animal Industry Board. The board includes seven members drawn from the pork, cattle and dairy industries, livestock feed producers, sheep growers, livestock auctioneers and veterinarians.

Together, these groups and others worked through the end of 2013 to create Senate Bill 46, proposed legislation they hope will win across the board support.

“Compromises were made by all. We have come to what I believe is a good draft,” SDFACT’s Heidi Hunter told the Huffington Post.

What the New Cruelty Law Proposes

Currently, animal cruelty is only a misdemeanor. The maximum penalty for treating animals inhumanely is a $2,000 fine and up to a year in jail. If passed, the proposed felony provision will impose a $4,000 fine and up to two years in prison for intentional and malicious acts of torture or other cruelty.

Those of us who love animals may say that even this punishment won’t be nearly serious enough, in some cases. That’s certainly true. Not surprisingly, the bill goes into more excruciating detail describing the livestock practices that are excluded from coverage than it does describing the activities that qualify as felony-level animal cruelty.

However, change sometimes happens only gradually. There is positive change afoot here for animals, and that deserves praise.

It will be no small victory simply to get felony animal cruelty provisions enacted in South Dakota. It’s been a long time coming.

Read more: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Photo credit: Thinkstock

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

165 comments

+ add your own
12:48PM PST on Feb 9, 2014

It's sad that "ag groups" - the livestock lobby - and the livestock industry in general - are so utterly despicable as regards their attitudes and actions toward the helpless animals that are so important to their commerce - - -

1:38PM PST on Feb 8, 2014

If AG is the issue....um... improve animal husbandry practices!!! And then make it a felony!!

3:52AM PST on Feb 8, 2014

It is a start...sad

6:23PM PST on Feb 1, 2014

Long overdue. SD come out of the woodwork. All animal cruelty needs felony charges.

8:20AM PST on Feb 1, 2014

To make it illlegal is a great thing, but those laws need to be enforced all over the continent and all over this world. At least, if made illegal, some law enforcement officials might get off their butts and do their jobs. Let's hope so anyway.

C'mon South Dakota~~get with the program. We are not living in the Dark Ages here. Take care of your animals.

8:15AM PST on Feb 1, 2014

Tricia H~~I highly resent your comment about the South. I was born and raised in Virginia, and we are not all stupid or ignorant. Those types of people that you refer to are all over the United States and the World for that matter, and yes, even from the North.

8:31PM PST on Jan 31, 2014

It certainly took a lot of dragging of heels before South Dakota finally got around to joining other states, hard to believe what took them so long. Bizarre beyond belief! Welcome to the 21st Century, but you still need to get far stricter when it comes to the law.

Thomas T, screaming 'go vegan' in caps lock is pointless. Animal cruelty laws also includes pets such as cats, dogs, birds and snakes. Perhaps this will help a bit with people perpetuating cruel acts to their pets or to other people's pets and only getting off with a slap on the wrist. Factory farming needs a total overhaul as well. I am surprised that it took so long for South Dakota as there are various other states with a large livestock population that did not take as long to get the word felony worked into their animal cruelty laws.

10:24AM PST on Jan 31, 2014

Took long enough...but think about all that was lost while SD sat on their asses!

10:19AM PST on Jan 31, 2014

I have seen & heard about S. Dakota. I have been there, the people are ignorant, they are worse than the south.

5:06AM PST on Jan 31, 2014

A start.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

This is relevant to the nature, nurture controversy. The environment does affect the expression of the…

At last, 1 well-written article, with no trendy, shallow slang-ey English. It's good to see this writer…

Too bad the article is not accurate. However, if the point of the article was to make people understand…

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.