START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,383,164 people care about Politics

Florida Strikes Down Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients: Will Other States Follow?

Florida Strikes Down Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients: Will Other States Follow?

The state of Florida led the way when it came to forcing welfare recipients to undergo mandatory drug testing before they could receive their benefits, even making them pay for their testing out of their own pockets. The requirement was found unconstitutional in 2011 but remained tied up in courts. Now, a federal judge has permanently ruled that drug testing is a violation of protection against unreasonable searches.

“The court finds there is no set of circumstances under which the warrantless, suspicionless drug testing at issue in this case could be constitutionally applied,” said Judge Mary S. Scriven of the United States District Court in Orlando, the same judge who blocked the requirement in 2011.

Even though the Florida rule had been tied up for years in legal wrangling and only spent a few months actually being enforced, a number of states decided that drug testing for different forms of public benefits was a fantastic idea. This is despite the fact that while the program was in effect, Florida saw very few fails, spending far more money on testing recipients than it ever saved in denied benefits.

Despite the implementation during a massive recession and a surge of Tea Party politicians claiming they wanted to cut unnecessary government spending, proponents of the program came up with a myriad of reasons for supporting the wasted funds, ranging from “protecting children” to “compassionately” forcing people out of “a cycle of poverty.”

Republican Governor Rick Scott is still sticking to his “for the children” talking point, even as the courts shut him down. “Any illegal drug use in a family is harmful and even abusive to a child. We should have a zero tolerance policy for illegal drug use in families especially those families who struggle to make ends meet and need welfare assistance to provide for their children,” Scott said in a statement, according to Talking Points Memo. “We will continue to fight for Florida children who deserve to live in drug-free homes by appealing this judge’s decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals.”

As other states attempt to drug test their own welfare recipients, however, they are learning the same lesson as Florida: those who are using public programs actually use drugs at a lesser rate than the general population. That’s the conclusion Minnesota has drawn as their own drug testing law went into effect.

The Minnesota law sneaked in under the radar, attached as a rider to the massive 2012 Health and Human Services budget omnibus bill. Most state voters, and even those who do advocacy work on behalf of low income residents, had no idea that it was even added to the final bill. But a recent investigation revealed that the state was now requiring random mandatory drug testing of any welfare recipient who had a previous felony drug conviction. Interestingly, that was only 0.4 percent of all people receiving public subsidies, as opposed to 1.2 percent of the adult population of the state in the general population who had been convicted, according to the Star Tribune.

“I don’t think anyone is under the illusion that this is about saving taxpayers money,” said Heidi Welsch, director of family support and assistance for Olmsted County told the newspaper. “This is punitive.”

Punitive is right, and it’s punitive in every state that has passed this sort of law, whether it is for welfare benefits, unemployment aid or other reasons.

With the federal court now permanently striking down the Florida law, hopefully we can begin to get this stricken from the books in the other states where it has spread.

Read more: , , ,

Photo credit: Thinkstock

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

237 comments

+ add your own
2:37PM PDT on Jul 1, 2014

The snap program said that this is unconstitutional. I call it crap legislature.

8:21AM PDT on Jun 30, 2014

Janis K., and do you have any evidence or proof to back up the claims and accusations that you are making? The answer is, of course, no you don't.

6:02AM PDT on Jun 30, 2014

Not everyone that does drugs is a pot smoking hippy some are violent, stealing and neglecting their kids and selling food stamps for drugs. I dont want to support these people

5:42AM PDT on Jun 30, 2014

I believe in lots of help for poor but drug testing is good. I dont believe that people should get welfare when they are doing drugs. If you are elderly, mentally ill or just making minimum wage, then I feel by all means, get the food stamps, section 8 etc. Not all people are able to make a living wage. Giving people welfare and food stamps because someone is drug addicted and not able to work is not helping them or the taxpayer. Go to a rehab and if they are still unable to work, then help them. Too many people dealing drugs and taking drugs are getting Section 8 and this makes the projects they inhabit very dangerous and hard for the police to deal with. If you are doing drugs, then you wont be supported by the government.
I believe in drug testing because I will never forget that I used to drive by a project that was section 8 financed and people driving by had their purses stolen to buy drugs and the whole project was a blight and a danger to the community. I dont believe in supporting drug addicts.

5:31AM PDT on Jun 30, 2014

I believe in lots of help for poor but drug testing is good. I dont believe that people should get welfare when they are doing drugs. If you are elderly, mentally ill or just making minimum wage, then I feel by all means, get the food stamps, section 8 etc. Not all people are able to make a living wage. Giving people welfare and food stamps because someone is drug addicted and not able to work is not helping them or the taxpayer. Go to a rehab and if they are still unable to work, then help them. Too many people dealing drugs and taking drugs are getting Section 8 and this makes the projects they inhabit very dangerous and hard for the police to deal with. If you are doing drugs, then you wont be supported by the government.

1:10AM PST on Jan 16, 2014

This tests cost hundreds of thousands of dollars and less than 10 people failed them. A complete waste of time and money.

8:12AM PST on Jan 11, 2014

they're finally doing the right thing. yay for the court ruling. I don't believe this tactic was to track drug usage; rather, only to browbeat the poor and try to disenfranchise them more

10:04PM PST on Jan 8, 2014

Good. It is a huge waste of money.

6:12PM PST on Jan 8, 2014

Legalizing AND regulating…….you missed the regulating. Butt keeeping the price lower than drug gangs charge. Prohibition doesnt work. We have a history proving so.

6:10PM PST on Jan 8, 2014

WE could only hope that were true.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

If you click on the link, Dr. Askew (a little bit off?) says that the tail feathers weigh 10.5 ounces.…

Enjoyed Fred L's comment! Other than that why not keep something that looks so beautiful continuing…

More governmental stupidity. Picking up a spent shell costs 3 years. Now tell me how many times that…

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.