- checking login information
The Animal Welfare Cause
1,192,986 people care about Animal Welfare
Loading...80 Percent of Antibiotics in the U.S. Go to Farm Animals
New numbers are out from the Center for a Livable Future showing that 80 percent of antibiotics sold in the U.S. are used in a nontherapeutic manner on farm animals.
In 2009, the Union of Concerned Scientists estimated that 50 million pounds of antibiotics had been used on farms in the two previous years, which accounted for about 70 percent of all antibiotics sold in the U.S.
From Wired:
The proportion of antibiotics sold in the United States each year that go to animals turns out to be not 70 percent, but rather 80 percent. Here’s CLF’s Ralph Loglisci, who got the confirmatory numbers from the FDA:
In accordance with a 2008 amendment to the Animal Drug User Fee Act, for the first time the FDA released last week an annual amount of antimicrobial drugs sold and distributed for use in food animals. The grand total for 2009 is 13.1 million kilograms or 28.8 million pounds. I … contacted the FDA for an estimate of the volume of antibiotics sold for human use in 2009. This is what a spokesperson told me:
“Our Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology just finished an analysis based on IMS Health data. Sales data in kilograms sold for selected antibacterial drugs were obtained as a surrogate of human antibacterial drug use in the U.S. market. Approximately 3.3 million kilograms of antibacterial drugs were sold in year 2009. OSE states that all data in this analysis have been cleared for public use by IMS Health, IMS National Sales Perspectives™.”
3.3 million kilograms is a little over 7 million pounds. As far as I can determine, this is the first time the FDA has made data on estimates of human usage public.
Antibiotics are routinely given to healthy animals on farms in a nontherapeutic manner, or before they actually get sick, to compensate for filthy living conditions and to promote growth. The problem with this is animals receiving low doses of antibiotics on a regular basis are like walking petri dishes for bacterial growth that can result in antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria.
The problem that follows is that these antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria can be spread to other animals, and to us by eating and handling meat and dairy products, along with other fruits and vegetables or by being exposed to water supplies that have been tainted by manure in the forms of fertilizer and runoff.
Our livestock industry is growing something our medicine doesn’t stand a chance against, and we’re all susceptible to it whether we eat meat or not.
In 2009, Rep Louise Slaughter introduced the Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act (PAMTA), which would result in phasing out the use of antibiotics on livestock, unless they’re being used to treat sick animals, along with providing funding for institutions who want to work with producers on this cause.
“This report illustrates the overuse of antibiotics in food animal production and makes a strong case for some common-sense limits on antibiotic use. We are putting millions of pounds of antibiotics into the food supply unnecessarily every year. This cannot continue and it’s my hope that these new data from the FDA will encourage even more members of Congress to join me next year when I reintroduce this legislation. Moreover, the FDA must move fast to issue strong regulations on antibiotic usage in agriculture,” said Slaughter.
Related Stories:
Burgers, Wings and Superbugs: Playing the Food Safety Game
Are Antibiotics on Factory Farms Making Us Sick?
Stop Feeding Farm Animals Unnecessary Antibiotics!
Read more: animal welfare, antibiotics, factory farming, farming, food, food safety, health, louise slaughter, pamta
creative commons
Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may
not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.
Recent Comments from Causes
BTW. eating healthy organic and/or pesticide-free food isn't a fad, and it used to be how our food was…
Dear mother of homosexual gods....a heterosexual pride parade?? LMFAO Even as a heterosexual I would…
Maybe you been talking to the wrong Whitehairs Franklin!!! I know a lot of very intelligent liberal…
meet our writers
159 comments
+ add your ownWe are looking at animals as economic machines. It is wrong when we (as humans) allow them to be in conditions that we would not find suitable for a visit from school children. This attitude changes the way people look at the world.. even subconsciously we are degrading life.
it is just not right.....animals should feel at home and that means living close to nature.......i wish ethical meat was cheaper and more widely available......omg 80% i thought it would be like 30%, it feels like health abuse of animals.
it would be good if animals everywhere were raised ethically and then there would be more antibiotics that could be used in foriegn aid, it would not cost anymore the money would just come from government rather than farms
This is one reason antibiotics become ineffective to humans, overexposure!
One cannot be an environmentalist and a consumer of flesh.
scary, very scary
scary
Herein lies our antibiotic resistance problems. What will be done when all antibiotics are rendered useless due to these practices and you come down with an infection?
As an R.N., I am very concerned over the prophylactic use of antibiotics on well animals. If you knew ..... the strains of bacteria that are now resistant to antibiotics because of overuse, .... you would be too.
...and when people eat these animals.. and get sick, then need antibiotics.. their bodies are already full of this, therefore does not work like it should..
thanks for posting this.
login to add your comment
use your care2 login
add your comment
20