START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good

Fostering Sustainable Behavior – Helping People Go Green

Fostering Sustainable Behavior – Helping People Go Green

The relationship between the environment and human psychology is age-old, yet encouraging populations to alter their behavior to become “green” is another challenge altogether.  To address this challenge, the field of ecopsychology is increasing in relevance and demand, not only in universities, but in business and popular culture.

The term “sustainability” in many ways echoes ecopsychology and is commonly used today as a tool to relate to, acknowledge and ultimately mitigate, climate change. But what does it actually mean? Oftentimes, it comes down to marketing. Many businesses and universities now have a sustainability coordinator on staff to help manage recycling and compost programs and “sustainability” pops up on many present-day products from food to laundry detergent.

Sustainability often addresses the need to mitigate climate change while ultimately maintaining our current economic relationship with existing resources on Earth; it does not necessarily aim to decrease demand of resources or change our inherent driving behavior, for example.  Sustainability exists in such a way to be environmentally conscious while not entirely shocking the economic system — and in some cases even prolonging it, as seen with the Prius Fallacy and Jevons Paradox.

In many instances, it’s an economic issue with an environmental impact.  In other words, very few people will choose to go cold this winter in an effort to be green, but they may take action to ensure their house is energy efficient, thereby demanding less energy and saving money in the process.  It’s also important to note that the term sustainability is used predominantly from an anthropocentric standpoint taking into account existing — mainly western — ways of life; poorer cultures are often by default sustainable given they typically demand less.

While arguments exist about the ultimate impact of sustainability, the shift is a necessary one, particularly given Americans demand roughly 25% of the world’s fossil fuel resources.  Doug McKenzie-Mohr, a prominent environmental psychologist, highlights the sustainability trend and breaks down what we can do every day to combat climate change in our homes and offices, but is this behavior modification enough to make a dent in looming climate catastrophe?  And what does it take to make humans truly alter their behavior?

Sustainable behavior impediments can typically be boiled down to: commitment, affordability, convenience and incentives. Humans, at least the populations Dr. McKenzie-Mohr has studied, tend to default to the lowest common denominator of behavior when it comes to environmentalism.  Of course, this isn’t to say there aren’t personalities who go above and beyond for the greater good, but overall, unless regulated to do so, or cajoled by neighbors or friends, most people will resort to the path of least resistance.  Knowing this intrinsic behavior trend, Dr. McKenzie-Mohr is able to extrapolate on how to best create systems whereby these same individuals could easily do their part to create a more sustainable, healthy and balanced planet.

One example is recycling.  Initially, in the 1980s, recycling was seen as a confusing burden to the majority of consumers.  Today, however, the mere act of recycling, sorting out plastic from paper and glass from cardboard, is now viewed as commonplace and requires little thought. Most U.S. cities have recycling facilities in operation.

So, how did this behavior change happen?  Interestingly, Dr. McKenzie-Mohr cites community influence and social norms coupled with municipality engagement.  If a person sees their neighbors, family members or friends recycling, they may begin to question their own behavior and adapt accordingly.

Energy efficiency and renewable energy is another example.  Today, consumers have a multitude of product options from CFLs to energy-saving Energy Star appliances, but, as Dr. McKenzie-Mohr points out, there remains a disconnect between awareness of the the product’s existence, where to get the rebate for the product and the technicalities of product installation. These barriers may seem trivial, but they can lead to a significant delay in action.  It’s therefore key to not only increase awareness of energy efficiency products, but to educate the consumer on proper follow through behavior and resources to ensure the true benefit is achieved.

All of this can seem somewhat daunting, particularly applied on a global scale. However, through altered aggregate consumer norms and lifestyle changes, our relationship to the planet, while complex, can improve. In fact, it’s been shown that the more one demands and the more stuff one has, the more depressed that person is.  And while being sustainable in everyday life isn’t necessarily the answer to climate change, it plays an important role and is better than the alternative: doing nothing.

Related Stories:

Walmart Fails at Sustainability

Why Cuba’s Sustainability Is Not An Accident

Now Is The Time

Read more: , , , , , ,

Photo Credit: Mlane78212

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
4:29AM PDT on May 3, 2012

Thank you for sharing.

7:45PM PDT on May 2, 2012

People copy what others do - so be an example that people can follow ....

12:37PM PDT on May 2, 2012


4:27PM PDT on May 1, 2012

Third world countries could care less about Climate Change. They will kill every animal in sight to extinction and then blame it on the US. Thanks to my employers i have had the opportunity to visit so many third world countries and i would like you to know if you saw the horror's inflicted upon animals it would absolutely make you throw your guts up. It is horrendous. The only thing these countries care about is US aid. While in Angola there was a container ship unloading thousands of 50 lb burlap bags with rice, grain and corn, each bag was stenciled with "Compliments Of The People Of The United States" and what i saw was the Angolan military with spray paint cans covering this stencil up. Monkeys on the market with their legs broke so they couldn't run away. Riley's turtles on their back with their bellies totally gone and organs still functioning to prove how fresh they are. Folks i just mentioned the minor things these third world countries do to animals, believe me if you are an animal lover like me you don't wan't to hear any more. If you know anyone that works in the oil patch in some damn third world country just ask them if i am lying. Thank you for reading my post.

2:20AM PDT on May 1, 2012


2:20AM PDT on May 1, 2012


11:04PM PDT on Apr 29, 2012

Anyone who uses the term "sustainable growth" is a fool or a charlatan.

A finite world cannot support an infinite number of people so exponential growth is not sustainable. It must stop at some point, either with fewer births or with more deaths.

Wherever limits were reached there was most certainly no divine intervention to supply more food, water, air or land.

As an analogy to illiteracy, some people are innumerate and do not (or perhaps do not want to) comprehend numbers.

That is the only way that the catholics, mormons and funny-mentalists can opine about the world.

4:44PM PDT on Apr 29, 2012

"Sustainability often addresses the need to mitigate climate change while ultimately maintaining our current economic relationship with existing resources on Earth; it does not necessarily aim to decrease demand of resources or change our inherent driving behavior, for example. Sustainability exists in such a way to be environmentally conscious while not entirely shocking the economic system — and in some cases even prolonging it, as seen with the Prius Fallacy and Jevons Paradox."


"You can't solve an existing problem with the same level of understanding you got into it with." -Albert Einstein

A shame that sustainability, let alone regenerativeness, and our current society are a complete contradiction. Since concepts such as steady-state and managed decline are considered preposterous by mainstream society, there can be no sustainability.

And individual consumer behavior only counts for about 20% of pollution and GHGs, despite all the poutraging about plastic bottles, et al. The rest is entirely institutional - business buying from one another and processing things, the governments interactions with businesses and citizens, etc, and within institutional pollution, agriculture rules the roost. It would not be entirely implausible to say that agriculture is the enemy of sustainability.

Until institutional reform or the complete death of the human race is forced upon humanity, nothing will happen because conservation of energy is one of the 3 prime in

6:09PM PDT on Apr 28, 2012

Thanks for the article.

12:15PM PDT on Apr 28, 2012

I will do anything to educate folks about how serious Climate Change is. It is already a proven fact, what scares me is what will it take for folks to realize this. The pic's you may see about this problem are just "NICE" pic's but if you could witness the true magnitude you would not believe it. I really don't care about myself in this matter but my heart pours out for all the arctic animals that have to deal with something humans created and it is truly sad. Thank you everyone who took the time to read about my thoughts.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

@ Cyan D: According to the Criminal Justice Information Services Division, a white person in the US…

Please, please make a donation to the African Wildlife Federation or to Save the Rhino or Rhinos Without…

ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.