START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
571,472 people care about Real Food

GM Fish Study Raises Red Flags

GM Fish Study Raises Red Flags

 

One look at a wild salmon against the background of a same-aged AquAdvantage® Salmon explains why AquaBounty is at the front of the pack in the race to put genetically modified salmon on our plates. The transgenic fish is ready to harvest in 16 to 18 months, while the wild species requires twice that time. With human population on a steady increase and fish stocks on a decline, that’s a promise raising a lot of interest.

Insert a Chinook salmon gene into Atlantic salmon, and the result is this fast-growing fish. It is easy to make a business case for fish that require a lot less feed and all the other inputs that go into aquaculture. As to its safety, AquaBounty advises, “Fish grown from AquAdvantage® eggs are all female and sterile, making it impossible for them to breed amongst themselves. In addition, FDA approval requires them to be grown in physically contained systems, further reducing any potential impact on wild populations.”

In August 2010 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration released its Environmental Assessment for AquAdvantage® Salmon. They declared “the likelihood of escape is extremely small” and that “the GE salmon are all-female, triploid fish that cannot reproduce among themselves or with wild or escaped domesticated, non-GE salmon.”

New research raises red flags

Canadian researchers at Memorial University of Newfoundland inserted the same salmon gene into farmed Atlantic salmon to provide an independent assessment of the potential impact on wild stocks. They have just released results that raise a red flag. They warn that although wild males outperformed their more aggressive transgenic cousins under naturalized laboratory conditions, the transgenic males were able to fertilize eggs. The study’s lead author, Derek Moreau, said that showed the genetically engineered fish “have the potential to contribute modified genes to wild populations.”

Moreau cautions, “these data highlight the importance of preventing reproductively-viable GM salmon from entering natural systems.”

AquaBounty insists its fish will only be farmed in carefully contained settings and will be unable to reproduce anyway. Writing for Fast Company, Ariel Schwartz points out, “AquaBounty will most likely not be the only company invested in the GM fish market. And even if the GM salmon don’t reproduce faster than other salmon species, they can still harm the gene pool and degrade salmon survival traits.”

In the Montreal Gazette Beatrice Fantoni reports, “Matthew Abbott, the co-ordinator of Fundy Baykeeper conservation group in Saint Andrews, N.B., said it is common for farmed Atlantic salmon to escape ocean-based farming pens. It is not likely a fish can escape an inland farm, he said, but if transgenic Atlantic salmon were approved for production in Canada, he would not be surprised if producers would eventually begin farming it in open nets in the ocean where escapes are almost inevitable.”

The GM genie is out of the bottle

Companies forging ahead with genetic engineering have far more resources than the scientists trying to track the long-term safety of their products. We are already seeing some of the unintended consequences. (See Scientists Reveal Glyphosate Poisons Crops and Soil and Roundup and Birth Defects.)

The GM genie is out of the bottle. In spite of red flags, there is little political or corporate will to lure it back in long enough to determine whether benefits will ultimately outweigh risks.

Related Care2 Stories

Aquaculture for a Hungry World
Is Seafood Sustainable?
Genetically Modified Fish: It’s What’s for Dinner

[The study appeared in the July online edition of Evolutionary Applications. Moreau. D, Conway. C, Fleming. I, “Reproductive performance of alternative male phenotypes of growth hormone transgenic Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)”, Evolutionary Applications, Wiley-Blackwell, July 2011: DOI:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00196.x]

Read more: , , , , , , ,

Photo from Pacific Southwest Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service via flickr

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

124 comments

+ add your own
2:16PM PDT on Sep 11, 2011

it's not nice to tamper with mother nature

9:59PM PDT on Aug 5, 2011

We can't let them escape to the wild and ruin the gene pools of natural wild salmons!

6:18PM PDT on Jul 26, 2011

Never trust a study done by parties that have invested money into the project.

9:16PM PDT on Jul 25, 2011

Doesn't GM anything just make your head spin? Seriously something is fishy!

4:30PM PDT on Jul 24, 2011

Great, let's add these freaks to the steroid fed, light deprived, antibiotic ridden chicken Americans so love.

2:49AM PDT on Jul 23, 2011

This is a very sad story. Other animals has to go only because "we" humans do not want to share the world with other life forms, these life forms "we" would not eat (vegetarian food is not a bad idea, or eating with conscience as the so called primitive cultures did and still do, if they still exist. No meat/fish every day). "We" destroy averything around us and "we" forget, that everything is important to survive, too.

As little child i thought that rain is when God and the angels cry - because "we" humans have forgotten that we need this "intelligence", someone who could help... if "we" hadn't turned away for many centuries ago...

"Only when the last tree has been cut down; Only when the last river has been poisoned; Only when the last fish has been caught; Only then will you find that money cannot be eaten."
(Native American proverb)

"We have learned to fly the air like birds and swim the sea like fish, but we have not yet learned the simple art of living together as brothers." (Martin Luther King)

11:55AM PDT on Jul 22, 2011

The only real way to stabilize population groweth and feed the people: Sterlizie 3/4's of each year's newborns at birth and provide high fiancial DISINCENTIVES for familiies that have more than two or three kids...like the Duggars who have 19.

11:54AM PDT on Jul 22, 2011

The only real way to stabilize population groweth and feed the people: Sterlizie 3/4's of each year's newborns at birth and provide high fiancial DISINCENTIVES for familiies that have more than two or three kids...like the Duggars who have 19.

12:54AM PDT on Jul 22, 2011

no to GMO.....anything!

3:05PM PDT on Jul 21, 2011

No to any Genetically Modified food.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

just how can they call themselves peacemakers when it seems that all they are really doing is shagging…

Surely each Child/case would be different

Any woman voting Republican does not love themselves or their daughters. Sorry to be harsh.

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.