START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,266,743 people care about Politics

Gun Control Is Totally Racist Against Guns, Says Former NRA President

Gun Control Is Totally Racist Against Guns, Says Former NRA President

The hard right in this country would like us all to know that they are fighting for the civil rights cause of our time.

According to former National Rifle Association president Marion Hammer, there is no group more discriminated against than gun enthusiasts. It’s gotten so bad, Hammer insists, supporters of gun control legislation are basically just racists. Against guns.  Said Hammer “”[b]anning people and things because of the way they look went out a long time ago. But here they are again. The color of a gun. The way it looks. It’s just bad politics.”

Hammer, of course, is referencing Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s proposal that would ban some high-capacity magazines and assault rifles. A proposal that is obviously, totally racist.

As Media Matters reports, the NRA is quite comfortable co-opting the imagery and rhetoric of the civil rights movement for its own agenda. When the University of Colorado decided to house students who wished to carry guns on campus in their own dorm the NRA called the decision “segregation” just like the “separate but equal” standard articulated in the infamous Plessy v. Ferguson decision. And while such comparisons are laughable in addition to being historically tone deaf, the truth is that the right is increasingly borrowing from this collective history in an attempt to push back against what it perceives is a lurch left under the Obama administration.

Take reproductive rights. The anti-choice movement has been increasingly dressing itself up in the history of the civil rights movement as a way to frame their cause as one of moral civic right. Traditionally, the anti-choice community borrowed civil rights framing in the abortion debate, comparing abortion to slavery and invoking the history of the 14th Amendment to make the case for fetal personhood. But with the contraception mandate that’s changed.

Now instead of merely and lazily borrowing imagery from the civil rights movement, the right is pushing the case for actual civil disobedience. Hobby Lobby announced it will bravely take on millions of dollars in fines per day rather than comply with federal court orders requiring it to provide insurance that covers contraception to its employees. Supporters liken this move to the Birmingham bus boycotts. In the same interview where Hammer compared an assault weapons ban to racial discrimination Hammer suggested citizens be prepared for what she warned was a coming mass firearm confiscation “in order to control the masses.” Said Hammer “Well we’ve tried to tell people that in order to control the masses they have to take your guns. We saw it in Cuba. I mean we have so many Cuban-Americans who understand. But there are just too many people who don’t believe it can happen here.”

The right won’t stop borrowing from the civil rights movement anytime soon. It can’t. It’s in a crucial fight to try and remain relevant in the national political landscape. But in reality this new “civil rights movement” is nothing more than a bunch of angry white guys with a lot of guns and problems with women. Come to think of it, that sounds an awful lot like the original segregationist movement not the civil rights movement at all.

 

Related Stories:

White Masculinity’s Ties To Rape and Gun Culture

6 Worst Reactions To The Newtown Massacre

Senator Feinstein Promises Action on Gun Control. Can Congress Deliver?

 

Read more: , , , ,

Photo from daveparker via flickr.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

375 comments

+ add your own
9:11AM PST on Feb 24, 2013

interesting

9:11AM PST on Feb 23, 2013

Interesting.
Have gun owners grown to adore their equipment to such an extent that they want to raise it to human status, with equal rights?!

I don't fear legitimate gun owners, nor do I wish to deprive them of their right to own a gun for a number of perfectly legitimate reasons. But I should be blind not to see the innate violence behind much that enters into society through the expression of such views, which do not serve to put people's minds at rest, but to make them even more insecure.

10:38PM PST on Feb 8, 2013

Thank you Albert, I think it is an important issue and a tough one for me, because I am both a liberal AND a lifelong gunowner.

7:24PM PST on Feb 8, 2013

Kevin B. I wanted to send you a star for every one of your lengthy posts. Well stated and great information! Thanks for taking the time to post them.

6:43PM PST on Feb 8, 2013

Racist against an inanimate object???

1:37AM PST on Feb 1, 2013

What a load of guff. I don't care what colour a gun is, or how it looks, or the colour or looks of the owner. I just don't want to see them in my community except in the hands of trained, supervised law enforcement officials.

2:33PM PST on Jan 29, 2013

Get a grip, Hammer!

1:50PM PST on Jan 23, 2013

as i see it wanda b does not want to be crime victim. like all you gun banners don/t mind being

9:53AM PST on Jan 18, 2013

Was Marion Hammer drunk when she compared racism to gun control?

8:02PM PST on Jan 15, 2013

@Ken H, what Wanda was doing was more than a small book.. it was a one woman diatribe of NRA talking points and all out bullying and name calling of anyone who disagrees with her extremist views.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.