START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,355,570 people care about Politics

How Campaign Contributions Compromise Our Judicial System

How Campaign Contributions Compromise Our Judicial System

You’d think that paying off judges would be a gross abuse of the justice system, but as it stands, that is just common procedure. Increasingly, corporate entities are funding the campaigns of judges at the state level, which, as the New Yorker points out, leads to a series of potential problems.

Currently, the general population votes for the highest-level judges in 38 states, and that number increases for lower-level courts. This fact is especially significant considering that a whopping 95% of American court cases are decided in state courts.

If you think some voters are ill informed when it comes to selecting a politician, just think how much less they know about the judges they are electing – the ballots do not even come with a party affiliation. As a result, judges obtain their position not on their expertise and ethics, but on running an effective campaign, which requires a lot of money. And it probably goes without saying that our corporation friends provide easier, more reliable funds than private citizens.

The conflict of interest resulting from this system is astounding. While judges should be beholden to the law, it seems likely that – since corporate entities are bankrolling the judges – they may feel obligated to interpret the law in a way that favors those who are helping to keep them in a position of power.

To be clear, this problem has been around long before Citizens United. Due to a shocking lack of regulations on judicial campaign contributions, money has had a significant impact for a long time. In the 1980s, there was a more evenly split divide amongst contributions to Democratic and Republican judges. Predictably, however, deep pockets won out, leading to a surge in conservative judges on the state level, particularly in southern states.

By 2000, state Supreme Court justices were spending 15 times more on their campaigns than they did just 10 years earlier. In the past decade, the amount of non-politician-focused political ads funded by corporate interests topped 90%. In fact, two years ago, conservative groups spent nearly four times the amount of money that liberal groups allocated toward state judicial elections.

Evidently, the only state in the country with reasonable public financing for judicial campaigns is North Carolina. However, even North Carolina has taken a hit thanks to the more recent Citizens United decision. This year, a Super PAC intervened with seemingly bottomless pockets to ensure a conservative judge would be elected to the state’s Supreme Court to maintain a right-leaning majority.

Perhaps the solution to the money problem is changing how judges are appointed. The twelve states that do not elect their highest judges employ a variety of different approaches. In California and New Jersey, the governor appoints judges to the Supreme Court, while a few other states including Missouri task non-partisan committees with coming up with judicial nominations to be presented to the governor.

Following her retirement from the U.S. Supreme Court, former Justice Sandra Day O’Connor has made judicial reform a priority. “When you enter one of these courtrooms, the last thing you want to worry about is whether the judge is more accountable to a campaign contributor or an ideological group than to the law,” said O’Connor.

At least awareness of the problem is growing. In one poll, 89% of people expressed concern that campaign money was influencing judicial rulings. However, until something is done to change how the system functions, expect inevitable corporate favoritism in the decisions judges hand down.

Related Stories:

SuperPAC Money Infecting Judicial Races

Get the Money out of Judicial Elections

Mixing Justice and Politics

Read more: , , , , , , , , ,

Photo Credit: Thinkstock

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

52 comments

+ add your own
3:10PM PST on Jan 7, 2013

Add to this the problem of fraud becoming common place under the DOJ policy of "alternative defenses" and a cancer of dishonesty is comingled with financial interests...so forget getting the honest services of most judges...unless your wealthy.

10:30AM PDT on Aug 20, 2012

Thanks for the article.

10:29AM PDT on Aug 20, 2012

Our entire system is compromised by campaign contributions and the system itself. We need radical campaign reform NOW. If politicians didn't need to pander to their voters I don't think we'd see such shocking statements and stances.

9:44AM PDT on Aug 20, 2012

Thanks for making people aware of this issue. This is a significant problem in North Carolina: I consider myself to be relatively well-informed generally, but it's hard for me, even as a retiree with a fair amount of "free" time, to get enough information about judicial candidates to make an informed decision; for working people or those with limited education and/or access to information, it's largely impossible.

8:41AM PDT on Aug 20, 2012

really?

5:17PM PDT on Aug 19, 2012

So... What else is new?

12:33PM PDT on Aug 19, 2012

i notice that only conservitive judges were reported on in this article, i guess they are to stupid to think that liberal judges are the same, Maurice S. Florida has been a state where you have to have a picture i d to vote for over 20 years now and we haven't had a problem with this, so what's the fuss, you have to show a picture i d, big deal you can get one for $15 without a problem

10:38AM PDT on Aug 19, 2012

vote obama 2012,we dont need a idiot like romney-ryan,stop this thiefduo

10:37AM PDT on Aug 19, 2012

Now i ask all democrat and obamavoters to protest against the new law on indentitycard with picture of owner,this i a real republican will to steal voters away from obama,they the republicans who left the white house in mess ,try now to eliminated obama what ever how,lets help the voters to get their card,we must fight back against the dictatorschip of romney who is a devil mormon and who collect everwhere money from his mormon temple,stop this jackhals,now the campain of obama must help the voters whit not a good indentity card to get a valeu one,vote obama 2012,nobody elde,we dont want to see destroy america by a republican wearwolf name romney and the other jerk ryan,stop this jerk duo

10:37AM PDT on Aug 19, 2012

Now i ask all democrat and obamavoters to protest against the new law on indentitycard with picture of owner,this i a real republican will to steal voters away from obama,they the republicans who left the white house in mess ,try now to eliminated obama what ever how,lets help the voters to get their card,we must fight back against the dictatorschip of romney who is a devil mormon and who collect everwhere money from his mormon temple,stop this jackhals,now the campain of obama must help the voters whit not a good indentity card to get a valeu one,vote obama 2012,nobody elde,we dont want to see destroy america by a republican wearwolf name romney and the other jerk ryan,stop this jerk duo

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.