START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,555,093 people care about Health Policy

How to Stop Crime? Get the Lead Out

How to Stop Crime? Get the Lead Out

Though you probably haven’t heard much about it, the crime rate has dropped dramatically since the early 1990s. The rate of violent crime has fallen to the level of the late 1960s, and what’s more, those gains have been sharpest in the big cities. America is safer than it’s been in two generations, and there’s no reason to think the trend won’t continue.

What’s responsible for this change? Is it better education? More draconian punishment of criminals? The internet pulling kids off the street and giving them somewhere else to vent their antisocial behaviors? Maybe. But one factor appears to play perhaps the most significant role in making our society less violent: the elimination of Pb(CH2CH3)4 — tetraethyl lead — from our environment

A new article by Mother Jones’ Kevin Drum documents how lead pollution skyrocketed after World War II, when soldiers came home, bought cars and moved out to the suburbs. Lead was used as an additive in gasoline to reduce knocking and pinging — its elimination is the reason that standard gasoline today is called “unleaded.”

Of course, lead is a neurotoxin, and a potent one at that. The introduction of so much lead to the environment led to behavioral problems, reduced intelligence and very likely, increased crime. Lead use increased in the late 1940s and early 1950s, and twenty years later — one generation — crime began to rise. As the children exposed to lead became adults, they became more violent and more willing to commit criminal acts.

It didn’t last. In the 1970s, cars switched over to unleaded fuel — lead didn’t work well with catalytic converters — and the level of lead pollution dropped again. Twenty years later — one generation — the crime rate followed suit.

Correlation is Causation

As Drum documents, if the link between lead and crime was confined to the US, the link between crime and lead could be dismissed as a case of mere correlation. That’s not the case. Rick Nevin, a researcher formerly with the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, has looked at crime rates around the world, in countries that began using lead additives in fuel later, or stopped using it earlier. The same curve shows up in each country: 20 years after leaded fuel is introduced, crime rises. 20 years after it’s phased out, crime drops.

When you see how lead is used by the body, it’s clear why. Lead disrupts the formation of “white matter” in the brain, the neurons that build connections between our “gray matter.” These make the connections less efficient, causing a corresponding drop in intelligence. Lead also affects the frontal lobe — the part of the brain responsible for higher-level thinking and impulse control, the part most responsible for what we like to think of as human behavior.

Obviously, lead doesn’t make everyone into a monster — that would be too easy. What it does, though, is make it more likely that people who might have been disruptive or impulsive to become instead violent and criminal. Every person it tips over the edge makes the world just that much more dangerous.

The more lead in the environment, the more people tipped over the edge. That’s one reason why violence exploded in big cities in the 1970s and 1980s — more people meant more cars, which meant more lead pollution. Add in the fact that highways were often run straight through the poorer parts of town, where children had less access to support, and we were creating a situation where crime could not help but rise. Indeed, one fascinating part of the drop in crime has been the murder rate, which is now roughly the same in cities of all sizes; big cities are not inherently more violent, not when we aren’t actively polluting the environment with lead.

Lead Hasn’t Disappeared

It would be nice to simply pat ourselves on the back, congratulate ourselves for accidentally fixing the crime problem. Unfortunately, that’s not the case. For one thing, that atmospheric lead settled out into our soil over the years, and it’s still there. Highways still run through the poorer parts of town; kids growing up in those areas are playing on lawns still contaminated with lead.

Our houses, too, are full of lead, at least if they were built before 1960. Lead windows and lead paint are often still in place today; they can’t be simply yanked out, because that risks changing long-term, low-level lead exposure into acute lead poisoning. The paint and windows can be removed, but it needs to be done carefully, by trained contractors; lead abatement is not easy or cheap.

That said, lead abatement is incredibly cost-effective. A $20 billion a year investment in lead abatement could lead to a $30 billion a year boost to the economy just based on the impact on intelligence. The crime reduction could produce benefits over $150 billion a year.

Of course, lead reduction isn’t sexy. We like to think that people are rational, and that crime can be eliminated through a combination of education and punishment. Outlaw the right drug, build another jail, start a midnight basketball program — these are seen as things that will reduce crime. We don’t like to think that it could be as simple as a molecule.

People are ultimately just bags of chemicals, though. Throw those chemicals out of whack and you can get bad outcomes. We’ve spent hundreds of billions, if not trillions, of dollars on building new prisons over the past forty years. That money would have been better spent on lead abatement.

More than that, Drum’s article is a reminder that when we improve our environment, we improve our own quality of life. Eliminating lead from gasoline was not done to reduce crime. It wasn’t even done to reduce lead. It was done to reduce pollution — the catalytic converter is designed to reduce tailpipe emissions. Thousands of lives have been saved by that change, simply because of the reduction in crime. If we focus on improving our environment, what other happy benefits will we find?

 

Related Stories

Chemical Industry to Parents: Avoid Lead, Tail Pipes and Choking

There are Probably Toxins in Your Clothes and How to Make It Stop

Can Planting More Trees Reduce Urban Crime Rates?

 

Read more: , , , , , , , ,

Image Credit: Steve Snodgrass

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

94 comments

+ add your own
9:31PM PDT on Apr 2, 2013

Where is the evidence? The population is older the G's of the 1990's are family men now with mortgages.

6:59AM PDT on Mar 29, 2013

Thank you for sharing.

6:02AM PDT on Mar 29, 2013

Thanks for the article :)

8:47AM PST on Jan 25, 2013

Interesting. Tks.

9:02AM PST on Jan 7, 2013

Stephen, I'm guilty of that one. What it should be is environmental toxicants.

5:44AM PST on Jan 7, 2013

One positive thing about this article is that it does not use the word "toxin." That alone gives it credibility in my eyes.

2:11AM PST on Jan 7, 2013

Interesting theory, but it sounds like a load of exaggerated extrapolation and conclusion jumping to me. Sure, lead was dangerous and phasing it out was a good idea, but to extend that to being the major factor in crime reduction is a leap too far.

10:09PM PST on Jan 6, 2013

This is quite a sweeping statement! How do you know crime is down when 2 million people are locked up in jail? How do you know crime is down when so many of the military are far away commiting crime in the Middle East? How can you know it is not the wars started anew back in the nineties which gave CRIMINALS a place far from home to vent their destructiveness? How do you know? Do you?

7:50PM PST on Jan 6, 2013

Very interesting. Last year I found out that I had severe lead poisoning and had to do a 3 month chelation treatment. My Naturopath ran a heavy metals test when I didn't respond to thyroid treatment. Now, I didn't have criminal urges but it sure did affect my ability to focus and concentrate, I would space out in the middle of a conversation and be unable to remember recent events. It was frightening. It didn't make me violent but it did change me. I believe that not only metals but other environmental toxins and food additives are responsible for behavioral disruptions.

10:12AM PST on Jan 6, 2013

Gosh who would of thought. Just goes to show how dangerous toxins really are/

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Soooo Cute!! (Maybe a little spoiled!)

This is not enough! Meanwhile greedy corporations and governments will keep destroying the forests. Inmediate…

@Regus/Cletus good to see your comments as ever. I wanted to respond to one part of your comment you…

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.