START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
2,477,647 people care about Environment & Wildlife

Idaho Proposes Trapping and No-Quota Wolf Hunting

Idaho Proposes Trapping and No-Quota Wolf Hunting


This month, Idaho Fish and Game announced its proposal for wolf hunting season this August through March that will be decided on at a meeting this July 27-28 in Salmon.

The proposal does not include a limit on how many wolves can be killed in four of the five hunting zones, including the Panhandle, Lolo, Selway and the Middle Fork. The state is also adding trapping from December to mid-February to its wolf-killing methods this year.

The department has not set a target for the number of wolves that can be killed, stating only that they will leave 150 wolves, or 15 breeding pairs, at which point they could lose control of their ability to manage wolf populations at the state level, according to the AP.

There are an estimated 1,000 wolves in the state, not counting this year’s pups, who will be vulnerable to being killed, or left abandoned to starve. Hunters can use electronic calls and any weapon they choose (guns, arrows, snares) and will be allowed to take two wolves this year, while trappers can take three. They will have 72 hours to report their kills. Imagine 72 hours in a leghold trap.

“We are concerned that the proposal for this year’s hunting season would allow too many wolves to be killed. There are far fewer wolves than bears, mountain lions or elk in Idaho. Allowing the population to approach only 150 wolves is unsustainable and not supported by sound wildlife management principles. Instead, Idaho should manage for a healthy and abundant wolf population,” said Suzanne Stone, Northern Rockies representative for Defenders of Wildlife.

If you’re in the mood to rally for wolves and find other wolf lovers in your area, visit Howl Across America.

Related Stories:

New Mexico Lifts Trapping Ban

Speak Up for Wildlife Stop the Extinction Rider from Passing

Loss of Top Predators is “Humankind’s Most Pervasive Influence on Nature”


Read more: , , , , , ,

Photo credit: dobak via flickr

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
6:46AM PST on Nov 15, 2012

Thanks Oliver. Great letter.

6:45AM PST on Nov 15, 2012

What is wrong with these people that want to kill, kill, kill! It is horrible. They must have a cruel streak a mile long on their hearts.

1:42PM PDT on Sep 3, 2012

Thank you.

8:44AM PDT on Mar 26, 2012

Don't kill off this beautiful animal!! God created him for a reason!

8:59AM PST on Feb 25, 2012

The amount of money people are spending, it is cheaper so feed and give them birthcontrol. Shame on you all!!!

12:39AM PST on Feb 17, 2012

Idaho should set the quota at zero. As in no wolves taken (euphemism for killed) at any time. This is the same thing as having no quota but in the exact opposite sense as Idaho currently intends. We need to stand up for wolves in the Lolo Zone and take every action necessary to prevent the senseless slaughter of these animals in an area where their recovery is by no means assured.

Ranchers, most of whom do little or nothing to protect their animals from depredation are already compensated for their losses and they frequently blame wolves for stock losses that are completely unrelated to wolf activity. This, in spite of their continued lack of appropriate stock stewardship and the fact that many of them are grazing herds of BLM lands.

Further these same people and others like them are blaming wolves for reduction in numbers of game in spite of the fact that habitat loss associated with over-grazing is the primary causative agent in reduction of elk herds and has nothing to do with wolves.

4:07PM PST on Jan 11, 2012

this "quick Poll" above for idaho trapping was worded as such that many including me cannot tell if the answer should be yes or no if one does not want trapping at all or killing of wolves in support of your last sentence " Instead, Idaho should manage for a healthy and abundant wolf population,” said Suzanne Stone, Northern Rockies representative for Defenders of Wildlife." Can you reword this before publishing the results. I believe the results will not reflect the validity of your question. Thank you.

6:03AM PST on Jan 11, 2012

no animal traps at all, how cruel and cowardly can mankind be; they should all be banned

12:11PM PST on Dec 22, 2011

We hold in our hands such power over defenseless animals it is
actually criminal. We can afford to be their protector and should be; not their executioner. Man is the most dangerous animal.

11:55AM PST on Nov 11, 2011

Poor wolves.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

I don't see anything wrong with what they did. They probably didn't necessarily need to vandalize their…

Yes! Lets do this everywhere in the U.S. & stop taking in illegals, to use housing when we need…

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.