START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

Illinois Rep. Wants ‘Common Sense’ Anti-Gay Discrimination

Illinois Rep. Wants ‘Common Sense’ Anti-Gay Discrimination

 

A Republican lawmaker in Illinois has once again introduced legislation to carve out religious exemptions from the state’s near year-old civil unions law, calling it “common sense” that religious adoption agencies should be able to turn away same-sex couples.

From stltoday.com:

State Rep. Dwight Kay, R- Edwardsville, again filed legislation that would allow religion based or affiliated adoption agencies with state contracts to decline an adoption or foster family home application, as well as licensure and placement, to anyone in a civil union. State Rep. David Reis, R-Ste. Marie and state Rep. Paul Evans, R-O’Fallon, are co-sponsors of the legislation.

[...]

Kay said his legislation is “just another common sense bill.”

“Religious based childcare done by Catholic and Lutheran organizations has been an integral part of the state of Illinois,” Kay said. “It has done a better job of handling child care services and it’s done much cheaper.”

Kay introduced similar legislation last year, but it failed to gain momentum in the state’s Senate.

The issue of whether religious institutions that offer adoption services should be exempt from the law has been rumbling on ever since the state legalized same-sex civil unions last year. Illinois has a strict gay-inclusive nondiscrimination policy and the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services concluded that it could no longer contract with organizations that refused to serve same-sex couples, but rather than comply with this ruling several institutions chose to close their services.

Indeed, the state ended $30 million worth of contracts with Catholic Charities across four church dioceses, Peoria, Joliet, Springfield, and Bellville, in July of last year because of their refusal to comply with the law.

Catholic Charities sued, arguing before Illinois Circuit Judge John Schmidt that there is a legal exemption in the civil unions law that means they do not have to recognize same-sex unions. Catholic Charities also said the state had a responsibility to maintain finance for Catholic Charities’ services so as not to harm the children in its care. The latter argument persuaded the judge to prevent the state from withdrawing its support in the short term while the case was ongoing.

However,  Judge Schmidt later ruled that the state has autonomy in who it chooses to contract with, and can dictate conditions for those contracts based on state rules.

Catholic Charities later decided not to appeal this ruling.

Related Stories:

Illinois Civil Unions Hit By Tax Dispute

Catholic Charities Suing Illinois For Special Right to Turn Away Gay Couples Seeking to Adopt

Illinois Catholic Charity Ends Adoption Services Rather Than Honor New Civil Unions Law

Read more: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Image used under the Creative Commons Attribution License, with thanks to nerdcoregirl.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

58 comments

+ add your own
5:23AM PDT on Apr 16, 2013

How do gay couples qualify as "suitable" parents for heterosexual kids??
A child needs a role model & biological parent of both genders. It's the law of nature.
In biology 2x same gender can not reproduce.

Life today, society today has broken down & more & more dysfunctional and chaos reigns, because People have lost all sense of perspective and lapsed into a "anything goes" state of mindlessness. Society is doomed.

6:53AM PST on Jan 9, 2013

Thank you for sharing.

9:19AM PST on Feb 20, 2012

1. Is it better that children live in an institution until they are 18 instead of living in a loving and caring family with same-gender parents?
2. Receive public money = abide by public law.
3. Churches should not engage in childcare on any level. Abuse is running rampant in such enviroments.
4. Good on both the judge and Illinois to stick to the rules.

1:05PM PST on Feb 3, 2012

With all the attacks on gay people on the rise, it makes me believe more and more that there are a LOT of people in the closet who just can't bring themselves to accept their own homosexuality.

12:00PM PST on Feb 3, 2012

If they can discriminated against same-sex couples, or or skin color, or those of a different religion, then they should NOT get federal money. Adoption agencies are there for the children, NOT ones personally religious convictions. They wish to discriminated based on religious convictions against same-sex couples, different skin colors, or different religion, then STOP giving them federal money. What they should be looking at is "can they proved a loving and caring home for the child?", "can they proved a safe envoriment for the child(the involves food, clothing, shelter, water, ect ect)?", "can they proved an education for the child?" and "do the adults have a record and if so what and for some how long ago?
Common sense when it comes to the care of a child does not have to do with sexual orientation, or skin color or religion (yes they will believe they can discriminate against those two next) it comes down to whether the child is happy and safe and cared for. I know many same-sex couples that would love to adopt a child, and I feel the same-sex couples will care for them better then most (not all but most) straight sex couples.

10:47AM PST on Feb 3, 2012

OOOO PLUUUUEASE! Common Sense went right the F. out the wndow the day this country stopped living up to the principles of "Justice for ALL" and we began to Pledge Alligience to the Bible instead of the flag, and all that it stood for!


9:48AM PST on Feb 3, 2012

Yet more Republican bigotry and discrimination. A child deserves the opportunity to have a loving home. Denying gay people the opportunity to adopt through a religious adoption agency is wrong. I would have hoped that all the religious adoption agencies would prioritise the needs of a child. It's sad that they don't. There is nothing 'common sense' in this, Kay. Nothing at all.

8:20PM PST on Feb 2, 2012

OHHHHH....NOW we "get it." Discriminate with common sense. Right. Uh, huh!

I'm sure the framers of our Constitution had tht in mind when they were writing it.

5:58PM PST on Feb 2, 2012

@ Mark S. obviously, one can not be a racist, homophobe or repugnut and have common sense.

5:13PM PST on Feb 2, 2012

“It has done a better job of handling child care services and it’s done much cheaper.”

Yeah... the Catholic church has done a great job with childcare... well except for all the abuse scandals all over the world.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

a sad sad situation... Too bad they riot and act just as horrendous as the accuser. Peaceful rally's…

Come here legally or don't come at all. There is no problem with legal immigration but there is a problem…

Please sign this one to http://animalpetitions.org/9779/immediately-close-cruel-fur-farm/ Immediately…

meet our writers

Steve Williams Steve Williams is a passionate supporter of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) rights, human... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.