19,351,769 members doing good!

The Politics Cause

293,233 people care about Politics




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

In case you missed it: White House issues directive for its Open Government Initiative

17 comments In case you missed it:  White House issues directive for its Open Government Initiative

There was some exciting news from the White House last week regarding government transparency via a GOV 2.0 initiative.  If you missed it, that’s understandable.  Most media outlets were otherwise engaged with the shocking revelation that a professional athlete had strayed from his marriage.  However, beneath the din of the Tiger Woods scandal, the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued its directive(.pdf) for executive departments and agencies to publicly share vast amounts of information.

The Dec. 8 OMB directive is the latest outgrowth of Barack Obama’s Memorandum on Transparency and Open Government(.pdf), issued Jan. 21, 2009, in which the president laid out the three principles of his Open Government Initiative:

My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government. We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration.  Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government.

The directive memo from OMB establishes specific steps and deadlines for government agencies to adhere to those principles.  Within the memo, the following four steps are established in pursuit of the administration’s transparency goals :

  1. Publish Government Information Online

  2. Improve Quality of Government Information

  3. Create and Institutionalize a Culture of Open Government

  4. Create and Enable Policy Framework for Open Government

The “flagship” site for this effort is already up and running at Data.gov. At present, however, only a limited number of government agencies are participating.

If the Dec. 8 Open Government Initiative(OGI) is properly followed, every government agency will have added three existing “high value data sets” within 45 days, and will have created systems for disseminating  future data within 120 days.  In between these deadlines, all government agencies are to have their own open government websites active within 60 days, from which Data.gov will import their open source formatted data.

Thus far, open source advocate reactions have been cautiously optimistic, viewing the OGI as big step in the right direction.  However, as Steven Aftergood noted Dec. 8 at Secrecy News, “Success is not guaranteed.”

The previous Administration used to invoke the theory of “the unitary executive,” which generally holds that all executive branch power and authority is vested in the President.  But the opposite may be closer to the real state of affairs, in the sense that the exercise of presidential authority is dependent on innumerable acts of compliance by scattered officials any of whom can, whether through disobedience or incompetence, frustrate the implementation of policy.  And the more ambitious the proposed change, the more likely it is to encounter resistance.

More recently, he remarked that the “Openness Initiative” was beginning “to take root.”  Again, there are some concerns.  “Most national security and intelligence agencies, however, met the new Open Government Directive with silence, as if it did not concern them,” Aftergood wrote.  While the OGI specifically prohibits sharing classified information, there are existing non-classified data sets presently controlled by the intelligence community.  Aftergood suggests that this would be a good place for them to start.

The opinions of Aftergood and others — Meredith Fuchs, lead counsel at George Washington University’s National Security Archive, for example — will be important to watch as the OGI moves forward.  Advocates of government openness are a tireless bunch.  Should some of the executive branch agencies resist the directive, and if its deadlines aren’t met, these are the folks who’ll be shouting the loudest.

I’ll list some additional resources below, but there are reasons to be optimistic about the initiative’s success; lead among them, Obama’s choice as Chief Information Officer, Vivek Kundra has already implemented a similar program for the Washington D.C. metropolitan area.  Kundra is considered to be among the leading innovators in using technology to ‘democratize data.’

See Also:

  • W. David Stephenson, “Democratizing Data to transform government, business, and daily life.” 23 July 2009. ~ This is Stephenson’s speech transcript and PowerPoint presentation for Tableau Customer Conference in Seattle.  He is the author of the upcoming book, “Democratizing Data,” which was to be co-authored by Vivek Kundra, before Obama snatched him up for his CIO.

Read more: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

White House image from Flickr.com user, ktylerconk, via CreativeCommons.org

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

17 comments

+ add your own
3:36PM PST on Dec 27, 2009

Will President Obama disclose details of Lobbyist (and LTTE) funding (if any) for his election campaign?

A Sri Lankan

1:13PM PST on Dec 24, 2009

Mr. Santora or Soetoro can't tell the truth if he tried and that is a fact. Look up those two last names with Barry before them and you will get a lot of information. Use these two seach engines cuil.com or ixquick.com and see for yourself.
The name BO came from his father's tumb stone he took on his father's name.
The thing I don't understand why would he call his grandmother a lier because she told a news reporter on ABC NEWS that she was in the operating room in Africa when he was born and she was so proud of him and what he is doing today. I think it very sad calling your grandmother a lier don't you?

12:17PM PST on Dec 20, 2009

I think this is wonderful news and progress - once again Obama is working to fulfill his campaign promises. Unfortunately many people, as these comment show, are very cynical and suspicious of his intentions. I understand the feelings of distrust of government because of what we experienced for 8 years with the Bush administration feeding us lies and misinformation - basically propaganda. In my opinion it is unfair, unjustified and very unfortunate that many people continue to use the same brush to paint this administration. There have been no examples of attempts to mislead the public from Obama. He told us what he wanted to accomplish and has been straightforward in his efforts. For some he moves too slowly, perhaps. But he is moving in the direction he was elected to follow and the public needs to be more patient as the cumbersome business of governing this country goes forward. He is doing what he told us he would try to do. No one should be surprised. Paula Hannah, Erie, PA

10:12AM PST on Dec 20, 2009

I thought the whole "blackface" thing was morally repugnant, but the last year has made me suspect Bush is still under there, somewhere.

4:52AM PST on Dec 18, 2009

Yeah 'acorn" is transparent. BTW How is all that hope and change coming? Oh sorry! I said something against Obama so now I am considered a crazy gun toting conservative. People wake up this moron is bankrupting America

8:11AM PST on Dec 17, 2009

Maybe the ET's are forcing their hand--I hear that disclosure is at hand--only a higher power in the universe can turn the corrupt government around--the hoodlums are running the world and we are all victims of corruption--I vote for the ET's !!

6:01AM PST on Dec 17, 2009

Barry Obama?... Transparent? Well after all it is Christmas... and Santa's coming too? Be safe and GOD Bless America (what's left of it)

5:43AM PST on Dec 17, 2009

Pre-election. Promises. Promises. Hours after elected, Promises. Promises.

Obama Promised: transparency, accountability, no lobbying. Obama promised scientific research. Obama promised protecting endangered species, animals in the wild. Obama promised to reverse Bush's 11th hour rulings.

I will only speak for the animals here. A major part of his pre-election platform was his love of and protection of animals. Obama tops Bush in eliminating, killing wild animals. Only a *few to be mentioned: Bison, Wolves, Prairie Dogs, Wild Horses & Burros. Massive unprecedented slaughter w/extreme cruelty.

Why? For outside vested $$$ interests. Ranchers/Cattlemen. Elite trophy hunters. Lobbyists. Total disregard for submitted reports by ecologists, biologists...

Obama promises of hope and change? For the animals, NOT.
Animal advocates who voted for President Obama?
B-E-T-R-A-Y-E-D!

5:40AM PST on Dec 17, 2009

Paul, "Selective transparency"?...... I like the phrase!!! I'll use it! (of course I won't give you any credit for it). Just kidding.......

8:58PM PST on Dec 16, 2009

great

add your comment

20
20 log in or sign up to start earning Butterfly Credits today!


Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

They are so cute,glad they are all safe and happy, and the mummy dog looks like my Angel!

Millisa, are we watching the same video? The dog obviously was excited at first to do what he was asked…

meet our writers

Aaron Pendell Aaron Pendell is a husband and father of two residing in Chicago with background in American... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!

customize your newsletter

This newsletter will be sent daily and will feature updates on all the causes you care about. Which causes would you like to include?

Copyright © 2012 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved