Is Genetically Engineered Salmon Safe?

This is a guest blog post from Ocean Robbins, co-host and CEO of theáFood Revolution Network.

Frankenfish could be on your dinner plate by the end of the year.

On December 21, at the very end of the last business day before Christmas week, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) quietly released its environmentaláassessment that found “no significant impact” from the controversial AquaBounty AquaAdvantage transgenic salmon. We’re now in a 60 day comment period that ends on February 25, at which time the FDA is widelyáexpected to initiate formal approval.

What is the rationale behind genetically engineered salmon? Why have scientistsáspliced genes from an eel-like creature called the ocean pout into the genome of the Atlantic salmon? These genes crank out growth hormone year-round, resulting in a fish that grows faster, cutting the time to reach market weight almost in half. This could meanácost savings for fish farmers, leading to higher profits for the salmon farming industry and (theyápromise) lower prices for consumers.

But there are massively disturbing ethical, environmental, and health concerns that make the introduction of Frankenfish highly controversial.

Corporations Given the Power to Create Life
Humans have been using natural selection for years to favor certain genetic expressions in animals and plants. But natural selection on the farm is entirely different than taking genes from two or more completely different creatures, and splicing them together in a laboratory.

Some people are concerned that the power to create new life now sits in the hands of corporate interests. Others are disturbed by the notion of eating genetically engineered animals when there isn’t even so much as a label to give them choice in the matter.

Withácountless more genetically engineered animal creations waiting for approval, the release of genetically engineered salmon could lead to a plethora of new life forms coming onto the market. John Robbins, author ofáThe Food Revolution and many other best-sellers about food, health and the environment, calls this “Pandora’s Pantry.”

Impact on Oceans and Wild Salmon
AquaBounty, the company behind the first Frankenfish, insists that their creation poses no threat to wild salmon populations.áButáresearch published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that a release of just sixty GE salmon into a wild population of 60,000 would lead to the extinction of the wild population in less than 40 fish generations.

AquaBountyáinsists that their fish will be raised in controlled pens and will never be released into the ocean, and that besides, their fish will be sterile. But every year, millions of farmed fisháescape from fish farms into the wild. It’s true that initial introduction of AquaBounty’s fish isáslated for Panama in highly controlled pens. But AquaBounty is planning to market the eggs, not the fish. Once the production of GE fish becomes commercialized, it will be impossible to control the whereabouts of every single individual and assure compliance with appropriate containment measures. Some degree of release may be inevitable.

As to sterile fish, at present, there is no guaranteed method to produce 100% sterility. In fact, the FDA’s most recent study found thatáfive percent of the animals were in fact fertile. If large numbers of fish escape, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to deduce that some fertile fish might not only survive in the wild, but thrive. Because AquaAdvantage fish grow many times faster, and becomeámature much more quickly, than wild salmon, they may have the ability toáoutcompete wild salmon for food, and to reproduce at a much faster rate.

By stipulating that AquaBounty’s fish will never by produced in the United States, the company was able toáavoid having to conduct a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that would analyze what would happen if things don’t go as planned. So long as the fish are only produced in countries with relatively lax environmental laws, they may be able to get away without further study.

But if the fish escape into the wild, they won’t stop swimming at national borders. This means that if they survive in the wild anywhere, they may soon be driving wild salmon into oblivion everywhere. The impact on marine and freshwater ecosystems, and on the economic wellbeing of fish-dependent coastal communities, could be devastating.

The FDA chose toáreview AquAdvantage as an animal drug, rather than a human food. In the FDA’s view, the refashioned DNA that is in every cell of the fish’s body is considered a drug, and that’s what the agency is regulating. If approved, the AquAdvantage salmon would not only be the first GE animal approved for human consumption, but also the first animal drug that’s theoretically capable of swimming off into the ocean and reproducing.

Is It Safe to Eat?
The FDAáconcluded the salmon to be “as safe as food from conventional (farmed) Atlantic salmon.” While this might be debatable, considering that the genetic makeup of the fish is a new creation, and there have been no long-term studies conducted on humans actually consuming genetically engineered salmon, let’s suppose for the moment that the FDA’s conclusion is accurate.

Is being as safe as conventional farmed salmon such a great thing? Salmon has been widely touted for its prevalence of Omega 3 essential fatty acids. And it’s true that wild salmon has low levels of many of the contaminants found in other fish. But farmed Atlantic salmon is an entirely different matter.

Jane Houlihan of the Environmental Working Groupácomments: “Nearly all (farmed) salmon (that) Americans eat are grown in dense-packed pens near ocean shores, fed fish meal that can be polluted with toxic PCB chemicals, awash in excrement flushed out to sea and infused with antibiotics to combat unsanitary conditions.”

Many medical experts areáalready recommending reducing farmed salmon consumption to one serving per month or less. Compared to wild salmon, studies have found farmed salmon to have significantly higher concentrations ofácontaminants, including such lovely substances as PCBs, dioxins, dieldrin, and toxaphene.

If AquaAdvantage does come to market on a large scale, and if it does reduce the cost of farmed salmon, thus making it more widely available and more affordable, is this really a boon to a hungry world? Or might it be a recipe for even more cancer and environmental pollution?

What You Can Do
Tell the FDA what you think: If you are disturbed by the prospect of a solid green light being given to sale of genetically engineered salmon in the United States, now is a great time to speak up. The FDA’s comment period lasts until February 25. You canásign petitions likeáthis one.

Take action for labeling: Genetically engineered crops are already unlabeled,áinadequately tested, and present in an estimatedá75% of the foods in America’s restaurants and supermarket shelves. Surveys have found that as much asáninety-three percent of the American public supports the labeling of genetically engineered foods. Perhaps the prospect of genetically altered animals pouring onto American dinner plates without labeling will tip us over the edge from concern into action. To support labeling, sign the Food Revolution Network and Care2′sápetition to Congress, or the Just Label It Campaign’sápetition to the FDA.

Protect yourself and your family: You can get aánon-GMO shopping guide andámobile app that can help you and your family avoid genetically engineered foods if you want to do so. And the Food Revolution Network offers a complimentaryáno-GMO action pack.

Ocean Robbins is founder and co-host (with best-selling author John Robbins) of the 90,000 member Food Revolution Network, an initiative to help you heal your body, and your world… with food. Find out more and sign up for free atá

This article originally appeared on Huffington Post.


Related Stories:

What’s Next in the GMO Battle?

GM Foods – Isn’t It Your Choice?

Lethal Virus Found in Farmed Salmon



Jim Ven
Jim Vabout a year ago

thanks for sharing.

Duane B.
.4 years ago

Thank you for sharing.

Carrie Anne Brown
Carrie-Anne B4 years ago

thanks for sharing :)

Care member
Care m4 years ago


Ram Reddy
Ram R4 years ago


Patricia Trillo
Patricia T4 years ago

I think it's the same story of Monsanto. The difference is that now is the fish turn. I do not understand how the government can approve such experiments .There are many evidence that transgenic food are harmful to health. Just search Monsanto and you will see many articles about it, and they didn't speak well.
Most of us know that eating fish these days it is not good because the sea is completely contaminated, but I do not think it's a good idea to eat fish invented in a laboratory.

Rehana V.
Rehana V4 years ago

Where & when will this interference with nature end.Crazy greedy world.

Magdika Cecilia Perez

thank you

Magdika Cecilia Perez

thank you

rene davis
irene d4 years ago

Thanks for sharing.