START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

Judge Rejects DOMA Immigration Case

Judge Rejects DOMA Immigration Case

 

A federal trial judge on Wednesday dismissed a lawsuit brought by a Californian binational gay couple who sued over being denied a marriage-based green card under the Defense of Marriage Act, but the ruling has been criticized for relying too heavily on a 1982 case that, some argue, no longer applies today.

Indonesian Handi Lui, who married his American-born spouse Michael Ernest Roberts in Massachusetts in 2009, sued after the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services denied his marriage-based petition for permanent residency. The lawsuit argued that this denial violated the Immigration and Nationality Act’s provisions banning sex discrimination and is unconstitutional.

In a five-page order issued Wednesday however, U.S. district judge Stephen V. Wilson dismissed the complaint saying that the court is bound by a 1982 Ninth Circuit ruling that decided against allowing a gay couple a relationship-based immigration pass.

In his opinion Wilson wrote, “While Plaintiffs and Defendants point out the alleged deficiencies in the reasoning in Adams, this Court is not in a position to decline to follow Adams or critique its reasoning simply because Plaintiffs and Defendants believe that Adams is poorly reasoned. The Court feels bound by Ninth Circuit precedent, and believes that those precedents are sufficiently clear.”

While giving the House Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) its first lukewarm victory since taking up defense of the Defense of Marriage Act, this ruling has been heavily criticized because it  is based on the Adams v. Howerton case, a ruling that LGBT immigration rights groups and indeed the Obama administration have argued is outdated and no longer applies to today’s legal landscape.

From Metro Weekly:

Roberts, wrote in an order issued on Sept. 28, “To the extent that Plaintiffs Challenge Section 3 of DOMA on equal protection grounds, that issue has been decided by [the 1982 case,] Adams [v. Howerton].”

As Metro Weekly reported on Sept. 6, DOJ — which announced on Feb. 23 that it was stopping defending DOMA in court challenges — faulted BLAG in a filing in the case for relying ”[t]hroughout their brief” on Adams — a case decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which includes the California federal court where Lui and Roberts’s case is being heard. The appeals court held in the case that “Congress has determined that preferential status is not warranted for the spouses of homosexual marriages.”

The DOJ lawyers argue, however, that ”[t]he reasons the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of immigration benefits in Adams are no longer valid today,” citing changed laws — at the time of the opinion there was a statutory exclusion in the Immigration and Nationality Act for “homosexual aliens” — as well as “intervening events and changing legal and social understandings.”

As such, Lavi Soloway of Stop the Deportations issued the following statement lambasting the trial judge:

“Judge Wilson’s ruling dismissing this challenge to DOMA by a gay binational couple is a setback in the fight to win equality for all lesbian and gay Americans married to foreign citizens and a rejection of the Obama administration’s strong arguments in support of the plaintiffs in this case. Crucially, it sets up a likely appeal to the Ninth Circuit on the question of whether lesbian and gay binational couples in that jurisdiction have the right to challenge DOMA in federal court.

[...]

“The Judge, a 1985 Reagan appointee, relied on nothing more than the 30-year-old case of Anthony Sullivan and Richard Adams, and refused to consider compelling arguments that the court must consider DOMA’s constitutionality based on current legal and social context. Wilson essentially states that no married same-sex binational couples should be allowed to challenge DOMA in federal court in this jurisdiction, a proposition that should concern all Americans greatly. Conservative judges must not be in the business of blocking access to the federal courts because of outdated decisions.

“Judge Wilson’s poorly-reasoned decision is an important wake-up call that the momentum toward full equality cannot be taken for granted, even with the Obama administration coming into court on the side of lesbian and gay plaintiffs. We must keep up the fight to end DOMA through the legislative process, in our federal courts, and most importantly in the court of public opinion. Unless DOMA is repealed or struck down by the Supreme Court, lesbian and gay binational couples will not achieve equality.”

President Obama, responding to a question about DOMA issues this week during an open-table question and answer session, has said that he believes the DOMA issue will be settled “fairly soon” given that there are a number of federal cases challenging the law. Read more on that here.

 

Related Reading:

9th Circuit Keeps Prop. 8 Videos Sealed For Now

House Dems Still Want DOMA Defense Hearing

Rep. Illeana Ros-Lehtinen First Republican Sponsor of DOMA Repeal

Read more: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Photo used under the Creative Commons Attribution License with thanks to netsu.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

14 comments

+ add your own
3:32PM PDT on Oct 24, 2011

Lets not overreact. Under our legal system the judge is required to follow what the judge believes to be binding precedent. If you disagree that the precedent is binding or that it is wrong, the remedy is to appeal. Hopefully the parties in this suit did that. Then the 9th Circut properly can review the continued validity and applicability of its Adams decision. The statement that we are left without recourse to challenge the law is incorrect.

6:53PM PDT on Oct 1, 2011

Pity that a few narrow minded people are in power to make decisions that affect many.

5:29PM PDT on Oct 1, 2011

Kute K.....by WHOSE definition do you cite "moral behavior?" Mine? Because, if so, I think these people are as "moral" as anyone else. Oh...wait....I'll bet YOU want to define "moral behavior," don't you?

NOPE!

1:47PM PDT on Oct 1, 2011

Kute K- when did the LGBT people ask for everything free? You make so sense. America needs to end DOMA because it is unconstitution. If you want to live in a religious state, consider moving to Iran.

12:06PM PDT on Oct 1, 2011

It should be done NOW!!!

10:27AM PDT on Oct 1, 2011

Bravo!!!...Enough of this gay "give me everything free and without question"..Atleast theres 1 court in Ca that stands by moral behavior!

10:03AM PDT on Oct 1, 2011

Would this Law apply to those Californians who are gay and now legally married, which the California Courts have allowed to stand, even though the ban against gay marriages is now back in force? If that's the case, then California is practicing "discrimination" against it's own residents just because they missed the window wherein they were married and the Law says their marriages cannot be taken away from them.

9:20AM PDT on Oct 1, 2011

Oh well!

7:50AM PDT on Oct 1, 2011

Good call, AJA. Reference: Socrates, hemlock.

5:34AM PDT on Oct 1, 2011

Surprise -- the federal district judge writing this bigoted and offensive opinion was appointed by Ronald W. Brain-dead Reagan.

Since the overwhelming majority of those in Congress who continue to support this obscenity of a law (and who would also bring back DADT, deny women their reproductive rights -- and are in general divorced from evidence-based reality, preferring instead to dwell in the Middle Ages) all clamor to have the death penalty imposed whenever applicable, they should also all submit to therapeutic euthanasia.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free
CONTACT THE EDITORS

Recent Comments from Causes

A no-brainer: remove guns and the US Constitution that gives citizens the right to own/use guns. But…

Oh goodie! Now that we've wrecked most of their habitat, we can now have our fun as we hear the rhythmic…

“Sometimes the prize is not worth the costs. The means by which we achieve victory are as important…

meet our writers

Steve Williams Steve Williams is a passionate supporter of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) rights, human... more
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.