START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
1,927,311 people care about Politics

Jury Nullification: Why Every American Needs to Learn This Taboo Verdict

Jury Nullification: Why Every American Needs to Learn This Taboo Verdict

Did you know that, no matter the evidence, if a jury feels a law is unjust, it is permitted to “nullify” the law rather than finding someone guilty? Basically, jury nullification is a jury’s way of saying, “By the letter of the law, the defendant is guilty, but we also disagree with that law, so we vote to not punish the accused.” Ultimately, the verdict serves as an acquittal.

Haven’t heard of jury nullification? Don’t feel bad; you’re far from alone. If anything, your unfamiliarity is by design. Generally, defense lawyers are not allowed to even mention jury nullification as a possibility during a trial because judges prefer juries to follow the general protocols rather than delivering independent verdicts.

Surprisingly, the Supreme Court has routinely agreed that judges have no obligation to inform juries about jury nullification. Paradoxically, jury nullification is permitted to exist as an option to all juries, yet this option cannot be discussed in most courtrooms.

A few years ago, Julian Heicklen handed out pamphlets to passersby on jury nullification to people outside of a federal courthouse. While the former professor was merely attempting to educate people about how the jury system works, he was charged with jury tampering. The prosecution labeled Heicklen “a significant and important threat to our judicial system,” but the judge ultimately disagreed and dismissed the case. Nonetheless, the fact that this case went to court at all shows how those in the legal system are willing to intimidate those who vocalize this loophole.

Jury nullification is undoubtedly feared because of its ability to upset the system. A jury that considers drug laws to be outrageous can nullify. A jury that is aware of the mass inequality in incarceration rates and believes a defendant was targeted via racial profiling can nullify. A jury that believes a harmless defendant is a victim of the prison industrial complex rather than a perpetrator can nullify. This counter-verdict exists so that citizens can right the wrongs inherent in our supposed “justice” system.

Of course, as the New York Times points out, jury nullification hasn’t always been used to “do good.” Historically, racist southern juries have nullified cases involving hate crimes and overly optimistic juries have nullified instances of police brutality, unwilling to fault police officers. However, if you agree that an informed jury can produce the correct verdict, nullification remains a valuable tool in the pursuit of justice.

Jury nullification would be helpful in a case like the recently publicized trial of Cecily McMillan. After having her breast groped from behind by a police officer, McMillan, an Occupy Wall Street activist, reflexively elbowed backward and was subsequently charged with assaulting an officer. After the judge suppressed relevant evidence, the jury ultimately felt compelled to render a guilty verdict, but its members were surprised to later learn that that verdict carried a potential seven-year sentence. Nine out of twelve jurors later wrote a letter to the judge urging him not to send McMillan to prison. Had these jurors known about jury nullification, they could have initially said, “Technically guilty, we supposed, but COME ON!” and not left her subject to harsh, unwarranted punishment.

It’s absurd that such an immense power remains a secret to jurors throughout the process. Essentially, it’s a crapshoot as to whether a juror has prior knowledge of the ability to nullify – an unfair fate given what’s at stake.

Whether or not you choose to exercise the option of jury nullification the next time you serve on a jury is up to your own discretion, but all jurors should at least be aware that this option is available to them. Spread the word.

Read more: , , , , , , , , , ,

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
7:18PM PDT on Aug 30, 2014

Without jury nullification, juries themselves are pointless. Those opposed to publicizing the concept are themselves abusive and corrupt.

6:22PM PDT on May 27, 2014

Well, I thought I knew everything (LOL) but I didn't know this. Fascinating.

OTOH, I am not a big fan of the jury system either

But then I am not a big fan of any system. Systems, IMO, don't work very well.

11:40AM PDT on May 27, 2014

Thank you.

7:57AM PDT on May 27, 2014

Another way to peacefully take back our country in addition to Jury Nullification, is the re-instatement of the "Common Law Grand Juries"! (See Besides handing our Jury Nullification Fliers (see: every Monday morning at the Seminole County Criminal Justice Center (see: Facebook/Fully Informed Jury Association Florida) in Sanford Florida I am also the administrator for the Orange County Common Law Grand Jury in Orlando Florida.

7:28AM PDT on May 27, 2014


6:52AM PDT on May 27, 2014

"Knowledge really is power!"
I agree...

4:48AM PDT on May 27, 2014

Yes, just as judges can decide "justice is not served" by following the letter of the law when that is obviously the case, so can a jury. Appreciate your sharing this information!

3:04AM PDT on May 27, 2014

The legal profession would love to remove juries as they are all about serving their master known as the international banker so they and judges will do their utmost to ensure juries are made up of ignorant people who lack ability to think for themselves . Yes we need to be informed and to help inform others. In Australia educated professional people are not seen on juries if and when we actually get to see one.

2:54AM PDT on May 27, 2014

Very interesting, thank you. I was shocked to read about Cecily McMillan being found guilty! Land of the free.... To assault and blame the victim!

1:28AM PDT on May 27, 2014

Thanks. Quite intriguing that most people, I for one, never heard of this before. Thanks to Kirsten for relevant info. I guess it can be used both ways, like most rules it depends on people's values and sense of fairness.
To people from Argentina who might view this thread: Not all of us agree with Simon T.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Caitlin S sent you a star for your post but you forgot to add DON'T travel to these countries.Anyone…

Good advice. I shop secondhand almost exclusively. I have a few brands that I know well enough that…

Joe V. "The fact that he is all over the news shows how frightened the liberals are of Trump." Ooooh…

ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.