START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,827,354 people care about Human Rights

Lawsuit Claims Cisco Helped Chinese Government Repress Falun Gong

Lawsuit Claims Cisco Helped Chinese Government Repress Falun Gong

Falun Gong is a spiritual group founded in China with millions of followers that was banned in China in 1999 for being a “heretical organization” and, indeed, a political threat. Human rights advocates have regularly reported that Falun Gong practitioners in China have been subjected to numerous human rights abuses. In a lawsuit filed last Thursday in Federal District Court for the Northern District of California in San Jose, Falun Gong alleges that networking giant Cisco Systems “supplied and helped maintain a surveillance system” known as the “Golden Shield” which “allowed the Chinese government to track and censor the group’s Internet activities,” says CNET.

Indeed, the “Golden Shield” system was, the suit contends, designed to censor Internet traffic flowing into China and to identify opponents of the Chinese government and keep them under surveillance. Cisco is being accused of assisting China in repressing dissidents and even aiding and abetting in abuse, torture and execution.

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Falun Gong by the Washington, D.C.-based Human Rights Law Foundation. Cisco’s CEO John Chambers and two other executives are named as defendants in the 52-page lawsuit, which seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages from Cisco and enjoins the company not to conduct “further unlawful activity”:

The lawsuit, which seeks class-action status, alleges that Golden Shield — described in Cisco marketing materials as Policenet — resulted in the arrest of as many as 5,000 Falun Gong members. Cisco “competed aggressively” for the contracts to design the Golden Shield system “with full knowledge that it was to be used for the suppression of the Falun Gong religion,” according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit was brought on behalf of 11 plaintiffs who are described as suffering torture and sometimes death at the hands of the Chinese government. The lawsuit listed eight of the plaintiffs anonymously to avoid “retaliation and further human rights abuses.” Three plaintiffs are identified by name: Ivy He, of Canada; Liu Guifu, of New York state; and Charles Lee, an American citizen who traveled to China in 2003 and was detained at the airport and tortured until his 2006 release.

Cisco’s activity in China only became public in 2008 through a leaked PowerPoint presentation. When this was revealed, Cisco “disassociated itself from the marketing materials, stating that they were the work of a low-level employee,” says the New York Times. But Falun Gong’s suit claims otherwise:

The suit claims that additional Cisco marketing presentations prove that it promoted its technology as being capable of taking aim at dissident groups. In one marketing slide, the goals of the Golden Shield are described as to “douzheng evil Falun Gong cult and other hostile elements.” Douzheng is a Chinese term used to describe the persecution of undesirable groups. It was widely used by the Communist Party in the Cultural Revolution.

In a post on BoingBoing about the lawsuit, Cory Doctorow raises a key point:

For me, the case hinges on the extent to which Cisco knew — or should have known — how its products were used. China’s record with respect to Falun Gong and other dissident groups is well-known. Cisco’s vigorous denial of any knowledge of the oppressive use of its technology just don’t pass the giggle test. It will be interesting to see what the court case reveals about the ongoing relationship between Cisco and the Chinese security apparat — if Cisco had on-site techs helping to create and maintain Golden Shield, it will be hard for them to argue that they didn’t know what was going on.

Here is Cisco’s response to the lawsuit:

“Cisco does not operate networks in China or elsewhere, nor does Cisco customize our products in any way that would facilitate censorship or repression,” the representative said in a statement, adding that the company sells the same equipment in China that it sells in other nations in compliance with U.S. government regulations.

The Falun Gong suit further points to the legal headaches — and serious ethical and human rights violations — technology companies can step into as they seek to expand the global reach of their business. How much did Cisco know — or rather, how much will it claim that it knew?

 

Read more: , , , , , , ,

Photo by infomatique.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

20 comments

+ add your own
3:14AM PST on Jan 1, 2013

The crime that the Falun Gong are charged with amounts to freedom of expression, Iv seen the people getting arrested while the are in the process of what is a basic workout meditation the police in China are very aware when tourists are watching as they try to hide their heavy handed attack on its citizens as they are beaten on the moment of contact, its vital for China to control the masses as you cant have that many citizens all having free thoughts @ speech the regime just could not handle that much freedom of rights.Can Cisco be held responsible before the fact? however now that they have been made aware they certainly can be held to count in that they are aiding @ abetting crimes against humanity.Governments must be held responsible for their actions in dealing with China, as long as any Government will steel its face to slavery none of us can be truly safe this is why corporations feel free to flourish as they are following in the footsteps of its political leaders who much of the time are bought @ paid for by vested intrests.

4:19AM PST on Dec 31, 2012

The execs involved at Cisco need to go to prison for this, preferably the labor camp in China.

3:48AM PST on Dec 31, 2012

Money unites them...

8:01PM PST on Dec 30, 2012

Unfortunately, they can use the same argument that assault rifle manufacturers use. There is absolute no other reason for the use of this weapon other than to kill people-not animals-birds,etc-but people exclusively. Yet they are able to claim it is the fault of owner, not the manufacturer.

7:56PM PST on Dec 30, 2012

i hope the falun gong members win this courtcase and get alot of compensation especially since other sufferers may never have the freedom or the money for a lawsuit

3:09PM PDT on Jun 15, 2011

practice, practice, practice?

1:03AM PDT on May 29, 2011

Thanks for the article.

2:36AM PDT on May 28, 2011

Disgusting,but they do it here as well so what's the surprise?The US government should face a class action suit by every internet user in the country.Where's wikileaks when you need them?

3:53PM PDT on May 26, 2011

thanks for the article

11:29AM PDT on May 26, 2011

I hope that if Cisco did help the Chinese government that there is a price for Cisco to be paid here.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

meet our writers

Kristina Chew Kristina Chew teaches and writes about ancient Greek and Latin and is Online Advocacy and Marketing... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.