Man Loses Child Benefit Because He Has A Girlfriend


Yannick Cloutier has been a single dad for 8 years, raising his two kids on his own. Mr Cloutier has been receiving the payments to which all families in Canada with children of a certain age are entitled  – the Canada Child Tax Credit — for those years. However, Mr. Cloutier was surprised to learn this month that because his girlfriend recently moved in with the family — making her his common law wife — he is no longer eligible to receive those benefits.  The law says they must instead now go to his girlfriend, a woman with no legal or genetic relationship to the children.

Mr. Cloutier called the Canada Revenue Agency and was informed of the “female presumption” rule — the rule which states that females in the household are assumed to be the primary caregiver, and therefore all payments on behalf of the children must go to them. This rule is at least partially based on cost savings — amalgamating all payments into one cuts government costs for administration — and in some cases may be helpful to the woman and children. However, the rule seems to have gone too far in this case: simply because a household has blended, doesn’t mean it is appropriate to hand over payments to the female in the house simply by virtue of being female — particularly when that female has no legal or custodial rights over the children.

To add insult to injury, the family was also informed that unless Mr. Cloutier’s girlfriend responded to the notification from the CRA within 30 days, all payments on behalf of the children would be cancelled outright. So not only was Mr. Cloutier no longer entitled to receive the payments, if his girlfriend didn’t agree to take them, his kids wouldn’t be getting the money at all.

The Canada Revenue Agency has refused to speak about this case except to state that the female presumption rule has been upheld by the courts and the Canadian Human Rights Commission. It does not, however, seem to have been upheld by the court of common sense.

Related Posts:

Lacking A Mommy Or Daddy Is Morally Wrong [VIDEO]

Mom Loses Custody Of Kids For Having Breast Cancer

Credit For 5 Year Olds, Yes. For Stay At Home Moms, No.

Photo Credit: Shannon McKarney (author)


Joy Jin
Joy Jin6 years ago

That's stupid! I hope that the family will be ok though.

Marilyn G.
Marilyn G6 years ago

The first time I heard of this, but it doesn't surprise me in the least. It makes no sense at all. Only in Canada. I'm surprised though, that Harper's tories would even condone anyone living together because this country has a way to go to enter the 21st century. Good luck to this man is all I can say, and yes, what happens if the girlfriend leaves? Yikes.

Eternal Gardener
Eternal G6 years ago


Annmari Lundin
Annmari Lundin6 years ago

Common sense and Canadian Government in the same sentence is an oxymoron! Just like saying: An honest lawyer/politician/drugdealer!

Maarja L.
Maarja L6 years ago

This is silly.

Ernest R.
Ernest R6 years ago

My beloved Canada has a number of rules that sound like they were made up by drunks.

Judith Corrigan
Judith Corrigan6 years ago

Change the female presumption rule quickly,where is the common sense rule?

Maria S.
Maria S6 years ago

Strange !

Janice S.
Janice S6 years ago

Please excuse my awful spelling! How about if I change it to absurd.

Janice S.
Janice S6 years ago

This sounds rediculas!