START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
2,484,375 people care about Environment & Wildlife

Environmental Film Canceled For Criticizing Big Agriculture

Environmental Film Canceled For Criticizing Big Agriculture

State and local organizations are demanding an explanation for the University of Minnesota’s decision to suddently cancel the viewing of an environmental documentary just two weeks before it was scheduled to premiere on that campus.

Producers of the documentary, “Troubled Waters: A Mississippi River Story,” a film about farming, pollution and the Mississippi River, say that UM vice president of relations Karen Himle made a terrible mistake when she canceled the airing without informing any of its nonprofit and public funders beforehand.

The film, which was produced with $500,000 in state lottery proceeds and foundation grants, was scheduled for broadcast Oct. 5 on Twin Cities public television by the University’s Bell Museum of Natural History (AgWeek).

The McKnight Foundation reports that “the pollution that destroys the watershed of the Mississippi River is not intended by farm policies or by the farmers, but nevertheless, it’s a predictable result.

“Decades of bad farming practices in the heartland of Minnesota, Iowa, Illinois, Wisconsin, and Missouri have caused sediment, fertilizer, and pesticides to be carried by rainfall runoff from farm fields into creeks and rivers that feed the big Mississippi River.”

Using a spokesperson, Himle stated that she made a late-hour decision to pull the broadcast after faculty and administrative staff members voiced concerns about its portrayal of conventional farming as one of the main causes of river pollution as far south as the Gulf of Mexico.

The University of Minnesota has yet to explain who voiced the concerns or when.

It’s not hard to imagine that the school’s long history as a land-grant institution which exists partly to serve agriculture could have had something to do with the late-hour cancelation.

As the Twin Cities Daily Planet alleged earlier this week, influence from big agriculture could have played a part.

The dean of the U of M’s School of Agriculture (the Bell Museum is part of the School of Agriculture) supported these fears by saying one reason the film was pulled was because it “vilified” agriculture (MPR).

Bell Museum Director Susan Weller said in a statement last week that she would establish a panel of scientists to review the film, but so far there has been no clarification about what the panel would review, who would do the reviewing, and when they would be required to come to a conclusion.

Like this story? Connect with Beth on Twitter or StumbleUpon!

Read more: , , , , , ,

Mississippi River at Riverwood in Minnesota
Image Credit: Flickr - christina.hope

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

95 comments

+ add your own
6:11PM PST on Jan 23, 2013

Will it be shown on youtube? hope so.

2:53PM PDT on Nov 2, 2010

I call that a violation of the right of free speech. Too bad everything can't please the agricultural cartels in the US.

6:44PM PDT on Oct 3, 2010

University of Minnesota, how smart is that? The person responsible for making that decision should be fired. And, the rest of the crowd that got scared at the first frame of possible controversy (Oh dear, oh dear!) should grow up. Get real. And, show the film. You know...like adults.

4:25PM PDT on Sep 30, 2010

They should have "reviewed" it Before "scheduling" to air it.

2:22PM PDT on Sep 28, 2010

Viva community pressure. Individuals need to get really noisy for us to beat big corporations from taking everything that is good in this country and then the world. Corporations remind me of the Borg on Star trek.

12:27PM PDT on Sep 25, 2010

These are the types of films that need to get out and educate the public. I would want to make sure that their claims are right, but if farming needs to change to save the waters, then that's what needs to be exposed. I'm surprised the government seems to be backing the film. They are usually the first to bury their their heads in the sand.

12:10PM PDT on Sep 25, 2010

Time to remove profit from all decision making that has to do with priceless, like the environment. No amount of $ can upollute the rivers. Go vegan and organic to reduce the pollution.

7:56AM PDT on Sep 25, 2010

Now the university is in fear of corporations? What? An institute of higher learning should be just that. Last I checked, we can decide for ourselves.

8:56PM PDT on Sep 24, 2010

must be a good film; looking forward to knowing that it is shown many times in many locations in the U.S.A.

4:53PM PDT on Sep 24, 2010

It's called "Free Speech".

Somewhere in the Constitution isn't it?

Like really, really, really near the beginning.

Get it?

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Nestlé's chairman recently stated, in reference to water starved areas of developing countries,…

I jump with joy hearing such beautiful stories and knowing there are still so many good people around…

meet our writers

Beth Buczynski Beth is a freelance writer and editor living in the Rocky Mountain West. So far, Beth has lived in... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.