19,386,235 members doing good!

The Politics Cause

292,991 people care about Politics




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Morning Mix: Santorum Now The Target, GOP Still Misses

184 comments Morning Mix: Santorum Now The Target, GOP Still Misses

 

Yes, there was another debate last night and yes it was as weird as you would expect at this point. Here are the highlights.

Wednesday night’s debate should have been Rick Santorum’s night. He’s helped whip the whole country into hysterics over contraception, held meetings with nativist birthers, made the case of climate science as “political science,” suggested mainstream Protestants were no longer Christian and has just enough momentum to snatch the Republican presidential nomination out of Mitt Romney’s well-manicured hands.

Instead BFF’s Romney and Rep. Ron Paul (TX) attacked Santorum as a fake conservative addicted to earmark spending who once supported a pro-choice Democrat (Arlen Specter) over anti-choice Republican, which is funny given Paul’s congressional district lives well off of DC and Romney used to be a pro-choice Republican. But I digress.

Romney and Paul have a heavy stream of ads attacking Santorum on spending and this line that he’s “fake,” so you’d think he’d have an answer ready. But he didn’t, relying instead on a defense built on the rules of Senate procedure and his time in Washington D.C. Is it just me or is it maybe not the best strategy to offer as a defense to claims that you are a Washington insider addicted to pork-barrel spending your extensive experience in D.C. horse-trading on legislation?

Also, whenever I hear the Paul campaign dismiss Santorum as a “fake” conservative I can’t help but hear “illegal” conservative. Just seems like that would fit Paul’s whole oeuvre more.

Thankfully Santorum was back on his game when the domestic policy issue of our time came up: women’s access to contraception. Here’s where Santorum showed us what his presidency would look like and what conservative leadership is all about.

The debate moderators asked the candidates what they thought about this whole controversy around women trying to make medical decisions on their own. Romney and Newt Gingrich (I know I almost forgot he was there too!) both dismissed the question as frivolous and offensive, unless we’re talking about religious liberty and religious liberty is obviously sacred, and no more so then when religious liberty is on the march.

But Santorum, he saw a pulpit and he was going to take it. And take it he did, offering a long exposition on the lurid explosion of teenage sexuality made possible by access to contraception.

Is anyone else half-expecting John Waters to jump out and shout “cut” at this point? Is it just me?

As ridiculous as his answer is, and as bloodied as Paul and Romney managed to make him, Santorum showed that he’s still leading the pack and he will drive them right off the cliff with this crusade. Rather than stick with their reasonable and still very conservative answers on contraception, Romney and Gingrich fell all over themselves to amend that answer to talk about the evils of teenage pregnancy and the need for abstinence education. Paul, of course, has always been against contraception so he didn’t have to change positions to be on the same side of the issue as Santorum and even tried to one-up Santorum pointing out the obvious: women’s immorality and lasciviousness is the only reason contraception is even necessary. Duh.

But Romney and Gingrich, in this moment, showed that in the fracturing of the Republican base it’s the evangelical base that now calls the shots. It is officially their party. I’m serious. No joking there, folks.

 

Read more: , , , ,

Photo from gage skidmore via flickr.

184 comments

+ add your own
9:45PM PST on Feb 26, 2012

"And you're in a "committed relationship," Craig.

COMMITTED where and to what?

9:26PM PST on Feb 26, 2012

"...of IT, dickh--d?"

9:18PM PST on Feb 26, 2012

Oh Christ on a Crutch, so LD B's divorced. So effing what? And you're in a "committed relationship," Craig. So effing what???

And I'm married. Wanna make something of d---head?

9:02PM PST on Feb 26, 2012

LB D no sureprize that you are divorced

8:02PM PST on Feb 26, 2012

Craig D. is a TROLL.
DO NOT FEED THE TROLL

7:49PM PST on Feb 26, 2012

steven b how am i a racist becos i dont agree with obama wait becos im not fooled by the obama charm ...............

in 2004 i voted for kerry in 2008 i voted for obama

6:08PM PST on Feb 26, 2012

Note that I said "many of the traits," not all of them. :lol:

3:16PM PST on Feb 26, 2012

LD B
Sea Lawyer would give him enough smarts to have passed the entrance exam into the Navy... he seems more in the IQ range of a jail house lawyer...lol

3:10PM PST on Feb 26, 2012

Steven B. said "Not only is Craig D a troll but ... he is what we called in the Marines a running target."

He also demonstrates many of the traits of what we in the Navy call a "Sea Lawyer."

2:35PM PST on Feb 26, 2012

If Craig D is a troll can I be the biggest Billy Goat Gruff??? Here troll, here troll... come out and play...LOL

add your comment

20
20 log in or sign up to start earning Butterfly Credits today!


Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

An auto accident can land you in prison for manslaughter, one person looked away for a minute, had an…

I enjoyed gym class back in my school days!

It is scary how little business cares about the overall picture for us. Little by little our faith…

meet our writers

Jessica Pieklo Jessica Pieklo is a former litigator who now writes and teaches for a living. Her areas of... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!

customize your newsletter

This newsletter will be sent daily and will feature updates on all the causes you care about. Which causes would you like to include?

Copyright © 2012 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved