START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
770,997 people care about Education

No Sex Please! We’re Just Kids!

No Sex Please! We’re Just Kids!

Perhaps it’s not that surprising that a mother in Menifee, California, asked the Menifee Union School District to ban all copies of the 10th edition of Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary after her child stumbled across the term “oral sex.” What is surprising, indeed horrifying, is that district officials immediately complied with her request, and pulled all dictionaries off classroom shelves throughout the Southern California school district, which serves 9,000 kids, kindergarten through eighth grade.

District officials said on Friday that they are forming a committee to consider a permanent classroom ban of the Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. District spokeswoman Betti Cadmus said that school officials will review the dictionary to decide if it should be permanently banned because of the “sexually graphic” entry. “It’s hard to sit and read the dictionary, but we’ll be looking to find other things of a graphic nature,” Cadmus said. (Isn’t that just what those fourth and fifth graders like to do?!)

Apparently some parents and free-speech advocates believe that district officials are overreacting. No kidding! Let’s put this in perspective: every year, public schools across the country receive hundreds of requests from parents, public officials and activists to remove books they consider inappropriate. Between 1990 and 2008, the American Library Association logged more than 9,600 requests to take books away from library shelves, summer reading lists and school classrooms. Most of these challenged books remain on the shelves.

Parents have every right to complain if they disapprove of a particular book assigned to their child. But for the district to pull those dictionaries without consulting parents, teachers, or the school board is not only ludicrous, it is also wrong. Here’s the District’s Mission Statement: “The Mission of the Menifee Union School District in partnership with students, families, and the changing, diverse Menifee Valley communities is to develop lifelong learners with the skills, knowledge, and desire to be respectful, compassionate, responsible, and contributing citizens by providing a high-quality education in a
nurturing, challenging learning environment in which all children are empowered to reach their full potential.”  

What kind of partnership exists if one mother has the power to empty bookshelves of dictionaries? It seems that the district has acted in a way that entirely goes against what it claims that it sets out to do. And how on earth can this be a “challenging learning environment” where students can “reach their full potential” if they are denied access to the most basic reference material?

As Peter Scheer, executive director of the California First Amendment Coalition says “common sense seems to be lacking in this school.”

Read more: , , , , ,

San Jose Library Photostream - Creative Commons
Judy Molland

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

178 comments

+ add your own
5:39PM PDT on Aug 26, 2014

It is a crock of plant-growth enhancer and it doth stink so that none can stand it! :D

12:08PM PDT on Aug 26, 2014

This is ridiculous

6:09PM PDT on Aug 25, 2014

idiocy reigns.... people like this moronic mother make me absolutely ill!

faux puritanism is alive and well, protesting in front of abortion clinics and pulling the dictionary out of schools... what's next?

are they going to pull the dic- out of tionary because one of their precious, miraculously, virginally conceived children might snicker at the use of the syllable 'dic'... heaven forfend! why don't we just sew their mouths and eyes shut,and stuff their ears with wax...

"...put on your eye shades, put in your ear plugs... you know where to put the cork..."

- The Who - Tommy



4:42PM PDT on Aug 24, 2014

The function of a dictionary is to list the words in a language, indicate their pronunciation, provide an etymology if possible, and offer a definition indicating its usage. Labeling the entry as colloquial, pejorative, dialect, obscene, or profane is common but not absolutely NECESSARY.

Many words that exist in English are words that do not enter speech other than in technical conversation. It is unlikely that a curious adult (if such a thing exists) would look up "parsec" in a dictionary, but a 14-year-old reading a clean (i.e. no sex) science-fiction story might want to know just how many miles there are in a "parsec." A seventh-grader might want to know how to make the sound of the letter "x" when it stands first in a proper name, as in the Biblical spelling of the Persian king Xerxes.

Of course, no God-fearing American parent would ever be at all curious about such things; we have learned, by the time we grow up, that it is rude crude and socially unacceptable to ask fool questions or use big words.

2:49PM PDT on Aug 22, 2014

Without good old Miriam Webster how WILL kids learn what oral sex is????

9:39AM PDT on Aug 22, 2014

When I was a little kid, a friend & I looked up "dirty words" in the dictionary. We found the word bastard and bitch ! Yeeaaahhhh ! Wild times, wild times. We were such little rascals. I know this might seem boring to a younger generation, but this was before the internet so we had to find our own fun. And you know what? I think we were all the better off for it.
Ah, memories.

I'm sorry, what were we talking about?

5:40PM PDT on Apr 30, 2014

p.s. If you are lucky enough to find a kid who actually WANTS to read a dictionary ... count your blessings and grow up.

5:39PM PDT on Apr 30, 2014

Hahahahahahahaha. Glad I got that off my chest. Hey, I used to read The Holy Bible when I was a bored little kid in church - believe me, there's an awful lot of smut in there.

9:44PM PDT on Apr 28, 2012

Bans like this really are absurd. They seem especially useless given the state of our near-ubiquitous access to huge amounts of information. Anyone with an internet connection has access to exponentially larger amount significantly more objectionable content. Parents can only limit what their children see so much. Almost anyone in this country who has access to a dictionary has access to the internet (whether it be at school, library, friends house, personal, etc.).

Children need to be taught how to discern the useful parts of the information they take in. Limiting this information intake is counterproductive to this aim, and will ultimately fail.

4:12PM PST on Nov 8, 2011

I used to think that parents having the ability to ban books from schools was a good thing - and then I grew up. Grew up and read many versions of the stupidity shown in this article.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

meet our writers

Steve Williams Steve Williams is a passionate supporter of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) rights, human... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.