START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
2,615,776 people care about Environment & Wildlife

Obama Administration Issues Rewrite Of National Forest Rules

Obama Administration Issues Rewrite Of National Forest Rules
  • 1 of 2

The Obama administration yesterday proposed a new forest planning rule that will guide the management of 155 forests, 20 grasslands and one prairie in the National Forest System, which
 makes up 193 million acres and receive
s more than 170 million visitors a year.

Earlier this month I wrote here about the administration’s decision to ban any new mining claims near the Grand Canyon for the next 20 years, a decision that protects over 1 million acres of public lands, including National Forests. Let’s hope the spirit of conservation has guided this ruling also.

From The Washington Post:

In announcing the new procedures, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said they were crafted to enhance the nation’s water supplies while maintaining woodlands for wildlife, recreation and timber operations. The lands provide 20 percent of the nation’s drinking water, according to the U.S. Forest Service, an agency of the Agriculture Department.

“Restoration is the philosophy, with a focus on forest health and our water,” Vilsack told reporters in a conference call, adding that the rules require that planning decisions be “driven by sound science.”

The New Blueprint

Here’s a look at some of the main guidelines in the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, or PEIS, for the National Forest System Land Management Planning Rule released January 26:

•    Plans must include components that seek to restore and maintain forests and grasslands.

•    Plans would include requirements to maintain or restore watersheds, water resources, water quality, including clean drinking water, and the ecological integrity of riparian areas.

•    Plans would be required to provide habitat for plant and animal diversity and species conservation. These requirements are intended to keep common native species common, contribute to the recovery of threatened and endangered species, conserve proposed and candidate species, and protect species of conservation concern.

•    Plans would provide for multiple uses, including outdoor recreation, range, timber, watershed, wildlife and fish.

•    Plans would be required to provide opportunities for sustainable recreation, and to take into account opportunities to connect people with nature.

The guidelines, which will take effect in early March, represent the first meaningful overhaul of forest rules in 30 years. The George W. Bush administration had issued a management-planning rule for national forests in 2008, but a federal court struck it down the next year on the grounds that it did not provide adequate protection for plants and wildlife.

  • 1 of 2

Read more: , , , , , , , , ,

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

40 comments

+ add your own
1:34PM PST on Jan 31, 2012

Like the current Canadian government, Alaskan congressmen and politicians are completely psychotic. They must be stopped from destroying the last wilderness and northern forests of Alaska. That means a permanent roadless rule for the Tongass, the greatest northern temperate rainforest.

1:31PM PST on Jan 31, 2012

They are doing this in the United States but they continue to destroy the Rainforest in South America.
They are total hypocrites and they are dangerous. This is all part of Agenda 21 to get rid of humans by first limiting where humans can go and second, where humans can live....mark my word, that is going to be the next reform....

12:31AM PST on Jan 30, 2012

What the forest and the wild life needs is not hunters, no poachers, no guns,all animals have to be protected ,non native animals and native animals deserve to live.

12:14PM PST on Jan 29, 2012

Stop the Forestry Department from building the roads for the logging companies. They then pay next to nothing for the privilege to cut down our trees to make a profit for their stock holders. We get nothing for this. Then same with the grass lands. The cattle ranchers run the cows on our land and get the USDA to kill the native animals that live there to protect the cows. What is wrong with this picture? The US government is there to help the industries that pollute and rape our landscape and not the environment.

10:55AM PST on Jan 29, 2012

I wish to add that if the goal is to protect habitat for wildlife and birds, as well as to provide a peaceful camping experience for people, then the ruling that allows guns in national parks needs to be overturned!!

10:16AM PST on Jan 29, 2012

It sounds good! It is a foot in the right direction. I hope the New Blueprint works out!!!

7:08AM PST on Jan 29, 2012

Looks ok at first sight.
More fenced reserve no human enters. No Poachers, Hunters or Arsonists thankyou!
If that means more forest guards etc, it's still worth it.
Cheers

10:45PM PST on Jan 28, 2012

Thanks for the article.

8:19PM PST on Jan 28, 2012

Let's see if Obama walks the talk.

7:06PM PST on Jan 28, 2012

"Cautiously optimistic" - me too. There is no expansion of the roadless rule here so it concerns me a bit that the "multiple uses" might be weighed heavily towards the timber and grazing operations.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

this is a never ending story. where ever money is involved, animals have to die. in spain they hang the…

Hey, Bill, there is more than one forum.. Yeah, I know, who would've thunk.. Scroll to the top.. Not…

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.