START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,292,077 people care about Politics

Obama vs. Romney: 5 Ways They Differ On Education

Obama vs. Romney: 5 Ways They Differ On Education
  • 1 of 3

Who knows where President Obama and Mitt Romney stand on education? Hard to say, since the topic has not been taken center stage in election coverage so far. In case you’re wondering, here’s a primer on some of their most important positions on educational policy.

1.  Teachers

Obama’s policies haven’t been uniformly praised by the teachers’ unions, but he knows he needs to work with them to forward education reform. That’s why he is receiving substantial support from the unions in his campaign. Obama has used competitive funding and other incentives to encourage states and school districts to reform their teacher evaluations and reward teachers for increasing their students’ achievement, measured in part by standardized test gains. This summer he proposed a $1 billion plan to launch a master teacher corps specializing in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM).

Romney’s education white paper entitled “A Chance for Every Child: Mitt Romney’s Plan for Restoring the Promise of American Education” decries teachers unions for “opposing innovation that might disrupt the status quo while insulating even the least effective teachers from accountability.” According to this plan, Romney wants more federal money to reward states for “eliminating or reforming teacher tenure and establishing systems that focus on effectiveness in advancing student achievement.” In other words, Romney is willing to hand out money to states if they eliminate due process rights for teachers and if they pay more to teachers whose students get higher scores on  standardized tests and get rid of teachers whose students do not.

Romney also wants to remove “highly qualified” teacher certification requirements from No Child Left Behind because he says it prevents too many people in other career fields from becoming teachers. Romney takes a strong stand against certification of teachers, the minimal state-level requirement that future teachers must pass either state or national tests to demonstrate their knowledge and skill, which he considers an unnecessary hurdle.

2.  School Choice And Vouchers
It has been difficult to pin down President Obama on the issue of school choice and vouchers. He has been more supportive of charter schools than many other Democrats, and in order to win part of the $4 billion Race to the Top competition, states had to have charter laws, and they also could not limit the number of charter schools that could open. Obama has also included support for charter schools in his budget proposals.

He has not, however, openly supported school vouchers, and in his 2013 budget proposal President Obama requested no funding for the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship program, a voucher system in Washington that allows about 1,600 students to attend private schools.

By contrast, Romney says he’ll expand the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program, and in his plan he comes out solidly in favor of diminishing public education and promoting the privatization of schools. Romney would subsidize parents who want to sent their child to a private or religious school. He offers complete support for using taxpayer money to pay for private school vouchers, privately managed charters, for-profit online schools, and almost every other alternative to public schools.

Romney’s major policy proposal is to enable low-income and disabled students to bring their federal funding with them to the school of their choice. This would require an overhaul of Title I and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (special education funds). This is unlikely to happen.

  • 1 of 3

Read more: , , , , , , , , , ,

Photo Credit: E.T.C. NEWS

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

90 comments

+ add your own
6:38AM PST on Jan 23, 2013

Thank you for sharing.

6:36PM PDT on Sep 7, 2012

How do you know it is a liberal bias?

6:29PM PDT on Sep 7, 2012

I am very disturbed by the liberal bias that I find when ever I use any sites or services to support and/or enhance the students in my class. I would like to clearly say that I have been offended by the assumption that everyone in the education field agrees with teachers unions. It is time to respect diversity and the freedom of choice. Both of which liberals loudly proclaim until someone like me challenges their point of view and say yes pro-choice should apply to school vouchers and to leaving schools in the hands of the ones who have the highest stake in them. Local communities, teachers and most of all families.

5:44PM PDT on Sep 7, 2012

hey idiots,
this is not scholastic. it is a separate website. scholastic simply provided you the ability to read it. They give no opinion either way. this newsletter was sent to teachers who should be able to read and think for themselves or are the bad teachers the article talks about.

1:56PM PDT on Sep 7, 2012

It is inapropriate to make these political statements. I doubt I open anything from Scholastic again. How ironic that the bottom of the page has a large Staples ad. I guess taking money from a Romney company is good Scholastic business.

11:00AM PDT on Sep 7, 2012

Well Kathy, some of us are not foolish enough to blame the union for the problems in the education system and do not celebrate the government destroying unions. We see it as what it is, an attack on American workers.

10:53AM PDT on Sep 7, 2012

I, too, am very disappointed that Scholastic politicizes Obama's agenda, and denigrates Romney. I am hoping with all my heart and soul that Mitt Romney has the opportunity to bring America back from the dependent, biased, weak place it has become. Otherwise, we and generations to come have have seen the last of proud, strong America, the land of the free.

11:34PM PDT on Sep 6, 2012

Shouldn't surprise me that Scholastic would pander to the teachers and their unions. After all, that's their main source of revenue. The good news is that the unions and their sub-par teachers are on their way out. Since Gov. Walker pushed through legislation last year making public-sector union membership voluntary, WEAC has lost a fifth of its members. Last year the union laid off 40 percent of its staff as it dealt with budget cuts and engaged in what executive director Dan Burkhalter called a “membership continuation” campaign. Meanwhile, since the law also made union membership voluntary for state workers, thousands of them, including teachers, stopped paying dues. In the time between Walker’s signing of the union reform bill and his recall election, WEAC lost 20,000 of its 90,000 members. The Wisconsin chapter of the American Federation of Teachers, a WEAC rival, lost 6,000 of 17,000.

In other states are losing members in droves as various states end the forced unionization of certain government employees.

That's the hope and change America needs. It isn't coming from Obama. It's coming from voters that are sick and tired of having the union agenda shoved down their throats. COME ON, NOVEMBER!

7:06PM PDT on Sep 6, 2012

DIsappointed also that Scholastic would post propaganda such as this. Although I applaud good teachers, my many kids have more than the share of bad teachers. Some people shouldn't teach. Some police shouldn't have a badge, some doctors should flip burgers. Yes, I am a civil servant. Obama hasn't helped the school system or Good Teachers who make learning possible. I wish Unions couldn't control the voice of public policy, Teamsters & Afscme are as bad as other Capital Hill lobbyists. Unions can hinder getting rid of bad people and have good people take their place. I know. I have worked with unions for >3 decades. I have a child with physical limitations, but brillant, another with significant dyslexia, one with milder issues with spacial relations, a couple good students & a jock with anxiety. I worked fulltime and did the best getting activities & volunteering in. If I hadn't pushed both the school system and my children I believe at least 2 would have failed. Teachers told me my now engineer son was "unable to learn" and needed to go into the special needs class, allowed a daughter to be stalked and harrassed by another student who later is in prison for sexual assault. I spent hours campaigning for school levies, I vote. My kids were blessed to have some top notch teachers touch their lives. SUmmary: Given the chance & means-Heck yeah I would have had all of them in charter or private schools.

4:21PM PDT on Sep 6, 2012

I am extremely disappointed that Scholastic would post such a politically divisive "comparison." It should be considered an embarresment for the company and from now on they should stick to publishing and selling books not promotoing one politician or one party over another.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free
CONTACT THE EDITORS

Recent Comments from Causes

meet our writers

Kathleen J. Kathleen is currently the Activism Coordinator at Care2. more
ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.