Long gone are the days when doctors and patients could set aside time for effective communication. More often than not these days, we speak to the receptionist, the nurse, and the physician’s assistant. Insurance rules and regulations, mountains of paperwork, and time constraints have cut into doctor-patient time.
In an effort to educate ourselves, patients have turned to the internet. We look to sites like Web MD, The Health Central Network, WrongDiagnosis.com, (now part of HealthGrades.com), and RateMDs.com to answer our questions and reach out to other patients who may be able to advise us. Offering a world of information at our fingertips, these sites provide valuable facts about health matters and prescription medications.
The best of these sites provide a very valuable service, one which we have come to depend upon in our current state of health care. They can effectively fill the gap between us and our doctors, and connect us with other patients and patient advocates. But there are pitfalls. When searching for information online there are some important things to keep in mind.
* Consider the source. Look at the address in your web browser. Is this a reputable person or institution?
* Understand the difference between physician-provided information and patient-provided information. Other patients can give you a point of view that your doctor probably can’t. They can be the life raft in a storm but, unless they themselves are doctors, they can’t give proper medical advice.
* Even the most highly-respected doctor cannot diagnose or offer treatment suggestions online without having observed you and looked at your medical history. Use the web to create a list of questions to ask your personal physician.
There’s another pitfall if you’re a doctor. Unfavorable reviews and comments left online can wreak havoc with your reputation and your career. According to AP Medical Writer Lindsey Tanner, a growing number of doctors are asking patients to sign what amounts to a gag order, barring them from posting negative comments online. She also reports that doctors are being advised to suggest another doctor if a patient refuses to sign.
The internet gives each of us the power to speak freely in an open and easily accessible forum. With the click of the mouse we can make an instant impact on another person’s life, for better or for worse. It is not a privilege to be taken lightly.
We live in a fast-paced and very impersonal world. We often vent our frustrations toward the wrong person. The health care system in general is cause enough to arouse anger. Before we take that anger public we need to reflect on the situation, double-check our facts, and understand the possible consequences of our actions, both morally and legally. It’s all too easy to cast a negative shadow over another human being and, once something goes live on the internet, it takes on a life of its own. There are other ways to handle medical complaints.
That being said, I believe in the free flow of information and right to free speech. My first instinct is to say that I would decline to sign such a waiver, even as I respect the physician point of view.
Online health sites are a powerful resource, capable of dispensing invaluable information, but must be used with great care.
Read more: health policy
Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may
not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.
I'd gladly trade some bankers, lawyers and politicians for 10 or 20 times their number in hard working…
The Pakistan issue is that these countries smile in our faces and hold knives at our backs....for the…
Clothes are an artificial construct perpetrated on humans by some horn dogs long ago who got a boner…
1 comments
+ add your ownYes, online resources can be valuable, but they should not be a substitute for expert physician diagnostics and advice. I'm one of those patient advocates who tries to provide reliable information to others, but even then I don't have a medical background. Patients trust me, however, because I've shown to be objective and thorough.
What concerns me is that "health policy wonks" are starting to look towards online patient communities as a tool to bridge that patient-physician gap and to somehow lower the great expense involved in health care in this country.
And as far as online doctor reviews, they basically mean nothing to me. I've witnessed the manipulation of those reviews for a particular practitioner (both positive and negative), a "doctor" who actually called me at home after reading what I had written on my blog about my experience in his office and with his staff. I was not derogatory in any way and his mention was put in context with a greater issue. During that conversation, there was even mention of a lawyer and letters sent to a former patient (one who had left several reviews for him on a couple of websites). What that had to do with me was nothing, except an attempt at intimidation and a veiled warning.
Online business is serious business and we shouldn't take it lightly. We need authoritative resources to access for best patient information and likely any site with a commercial interest may not have the patient's interest in mind.
login to add your comment
use your care2 login
add your comment
20