START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
731,304 people care about Women's Rights

Only 50 Percent of U.S. First-Time Mothers Receive Paid Leave

Only 50 Percent of U.S. First-Time Mothers Receive Paid Leave

 

Written by Mimi Seldner, Ms. Magazine

A new Census Bureau report shows that, from 2001-2008, the percentage of first-time mothers receiving paid leave before and after childbirth leveled off at a mere 50 percent. As usual, the most vulnerable women–low-income women, women of color, young women and less-educated women–had the least access to paid leave.

By the numbers:

  • 50.8 percent: From 2006-2008 , the average percentage of working first-time mothers who took pregnancy or post-partum paid time off. This includes any paid comp time, including vacation and sick days as well as maternity leave.
  • 18 percent: Proportion of first-time mothers without a high school diploma who received paid leave in 2008.
  • 32 percent: Proportion of first-time mothers with just a high school diploma who received paid leave.
  • 4:1: The gap between paid leave eligibility for women who hold college degrees and those who do not; the largest in the 50 years that this data has been tracked.
  • 24 percent: Women under 22 who had access to paid leave. That number jumps to 66 percent for those over 25.
  • 46.6 percent: Hispanic women who received paid leave, the lowest of any group. 

Women with higher birth rates in the U.S. are often younger, less-educated and Hispanic. So, under this system, the women likely to have the most children are also least likely to have paid maternity leave available to them.

Keep in mind, too, that these numbers are pre-recession. Many of the jobs lost [PDF] during the recession were middle-class jobs such as teachers and managers, which are relatively likely to provide paid leave for soon-to-be and new mothers. The jobs added during the recovery process have been largely low-wage, far less likely to offer such paid leave.

In these tough economic times , employers have even less incentive to offer working women paid time off to care for themselves and their newborns. And in these woman-hating political times, the United States has no federal family paid leave plan to compel employers to offer leave (and Congressional attempts to enact one have been shut down).

This post was originally published by Ms. Magazine.

 

Related Stories:

Overworked, Debt-Laden Gen X Opting For No Kids

Fox News’ Megyn Kelly Tells Off Maternity Leave Critics

Should Multiple Births Mean Multiple Parental Leaves

 

Read more: , , , , ,

Photo from IntelGuy via flickr

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

55 comments

+ add your own
8:26AM PDT on Sep 9, 2012

I wonder who answered 'no' to the poll. Romney's supporters?

8:24AM PDT on Sep 9, 2012

horrible

12:39PM PST on Nov 17, 2011

As harsh as they sound, I have to agree with some of the other comments about not subsidizing people's choice to have children. The population is exponentially increasing, and the US has one of the highest birth rates of the so-called "Western" nations. There should be policies in place that encourage people to have fewer children, not more. Why should people who don't have children (that is, those who don't get any maternity/paternity leave) pay higher taxes to subsidize people to have more children, especially those who can't afford to support them? Even if it's not a tax issue, those who don't have kids bear the burden at work of covering for the employees who are absent for maternity or paternity leave.

3:57PM PST on Nov 16, 2011

Paid maternity leave? Some people just wish they had a PAID job!

1:12PM PST on Nov 16, 2011

some of these comments seem to be very harsh......why are women not using vacation time and the remainder time as short time disability for the usual six weeks off??? The only mandate for their emplyoyer should be a job when they get back.

7:33AM PST on Nov 16, 2011

Thomas, it would not be government provided it would be tax payer provided. I dont agree with the mandatory breeding age, what right does anyone have to tell someone when they can breed or not? It's a choice and I support that choice, just like I think that you should accept the responsibility of that choice.

9:15PM PST on Nov 15, 2011

And most other countries have paid guaranteed maternal leave...

8:19PM PST on Nov 15, 2011

If women want to work and have children, she should get a short time off with no pay. It's not a necessity. You don't get paid for taking off to go shopping do you? If you're not at work then you shouldn't be getting paid, men and women alike.

6:53PM PST on Nov 15, 2011

noted.

5:25PM PST on Nov 15, 2011

I think Shannon, that it would have to be government provided. The employer certainly can't be expected to shoulder the burden. But then you run into idiots who figure they'll just stay pregnant and never work. If it was done, it would have to be laid out very methodically to avoid abuses.
I stand by my earlier remark on a mandatory minimum breeding age. If you can pop out another little person before you can legally buy cigarettes, consume alcohol or drive, then something is wrong with our priorities.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

As often happens at these kinds of speeches, it appeared that nearly all of the homosexual activists…

If a horse is beautiful for itself, why men tend to mess with them. Not. Please, not. And, PETA is…

meet our writers

Julie M. Rodriguez Julie M. Rodriguez is an arts, green living, and political writer based in San Mateo, CA. Her work... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.