By now, many of you will know the story of Constance McMillen, the 18-year-old student of Fulton, Mississippi, who was told by the school board of Itawamba County School District that she could not bring her girlfriend to the prom as same-sex couples were not allowed. When she appealed the decision the school board decided to cancel the entire event. As a result, Constance has faced verbal harassment from her peers.
With the help of the ACLU, Constance McMillen is now suing the school for what she feels is a clear infringement of her rights and an act of blatant discrimination. Her appeal to have the prom reinstated is likely to be heard on Monday.
Now, the school board’s lawyers have filed a brief that defends the board’s actions, and contains the news that a group of parents have organized a private prom for kids at McMillen’s school. The caveat to this is that McMillen is not invited.
From the Clarion Ledger:
An attorney for the Itawamba County School District said the school board called off a high school prom to settle the “very explosive and disruptive issue” of the district’s ban on same-sex dating, according to a filing in U.S. District Court on Friday.
The filing by school board attorney Benjamin Griffith states that Itawamba Agricultural High School senior Constance McMillen “wishes to make the defendant district the site for a national constitutional argument over gay and lesbian rights.”
I’d interject that the school board made this a “constitutional argument over gay and lesbian rights” when it decided to firstly deny McMillen the right to bring her girlfriend to the school prom (and to wear a tux), and then to secondly cancel the prom, an act that has led to Constance McMillen being maligned by some of her schoolmates. The school board’s attorneys disagree however, and think that it is the school board that is being victimized:
Griffith said the student’s rights were not violated.
“This is not an issue where anyone has been denied an education or suffered a constitutional deprivation,” he wrote in the filing. “Rather, this is a social event that, in light of rapidly escalating circumstances, was disruptive to the school environment because people are on all sides of the issue.”
An affidavit filed Friday by attorney James Keith says school board members have been been under “tremendous pressure” as a result of the controversy.
“The school board was caught in a no-win situation as this matter developed,” Keith wrote. “One board member received threats at his place of employment because of the stance he had taken on the matter. Board members have received e-mails, telephone calls and Facebook messages regarding this matter.”
ACLU attorney Christine Sun called the argument “preposterous.”
“Long before this became an issue in the media, they had told Constance that she could not bring her girlfriend to the prom,” she said. “Really it was the school board’s decision to cancel the prom that became the big news story.”
Then, the news of a new, private prom event that will exclude McMillen:
The school board’s response states parents have organized a private prom at a furniture mart in nearby Tupleo. Now that the school district has withdrawn from the event, any constitutional claims are irrelevant, Griffith wrote.
Sun said she had only heard rumors of the private dance until she read it in the brief.
“Constance has not been invited, so it is clear to me that what is happening is that the school has encouraged a private prom that is not open to all the students,” she said. “That’s what Constance is fighting for — a prom where everyone can go.”
This, of course, tries to sidestep the original act of discrimination, and also adds what I think is a new dimension of disregard for McMillen’s rights. By saying that, because the prom is now being held privately, the constitutional issue over Constance McMillen’s case and the discrimination that she faced becomes an irrelevancy is misleading. It doesn’t. It’s still discrimination. Even if the latter example is legal, it doesn’t make it right, and it certainly does nothing to delete what went before it.
It is important to emphasize that the actions of a few do not speak for the actions of all Mississippi residents, many of whom have come out in support of McMillen. It is a shame, however, that certain parents in the Itawamba School District have decided to organize what is essentially a segregated prom, and in so doing have reinforced that this kind of discrimination is acceptable.
In other news, it’s been a busy old week for Constance. From being asked to present the Stephen F. Kolzak award to Wanda Sykes on behalf of GLAAD, the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, to being sent a special invitation from celebrity blogger Perez Hilton.
From Hilton’s blog:
We invited Constance and guests of her choosing to come out to Los Angeles for our big birthday party next weekend, where she’ll get to see some amazing divalicious performances and get to mingle with some very cool celebs.
That is WAY cooler than prom!
Constance has taken us up on our offer to bring her out, put her up and treat her like Homecoming Queen and we can’t wait to give her a big hug and thank her for being so bold, brave, courageous and all-round amazing.
And the good tidings for Constance keep rolling in. On Friday, Constance appeared on the Ellen DeGeneres Show where she told Ellen her story, and received a very special gift courtesy of Tonic.com. The video below also contains a brief chat with Constance’s ever-supportive father:
Constance’s legal fight goes on, but her singular battle has now become so much more. By standing up to the inequality that she has faced, and by doing so with grace, humility and a grounded mentality, Constance McMillen has been able to give a voice to other lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender teens who have suffered, and continue to suffer, discrimination, prejudice and alienation in our schools.
As such, this remarkable young woman has shone a spotlight on this kind of inequality, and for that reason she is, in my opinion, certainly worthy of all the good things that are now coming her way.
Davidson did say he will hold a trial on the issue later, but he did not set a date and any ruling would likely come too late to force the district to hold the prom when it was originally scheduled.
Davidson’s order says the district violated McMillen’s constitutional rights by denying her request to bring her girlfriend and wear a tuxedo, and ACLU Mississippi legal director Kristy Bennett called that a victory.
She said Davidson’s order allows McMillen to amend her petition within 30 days, meaning she could sue for damages because she couldn’t get the prom reinstated.
Related Posts on this Story:
Take Action!
Care2 member Cheryl Noffsinger has created a petition addressed to the school board that demands that they reverse their decision. Click here to sign it.
You can also contact the school directly and let them know you support Constance McMillen’s right to bring her date to the prom. Click here for more information. A big thank you to reader Melissa Elaine Gacuzana for pointing to this action.
Thank you to all those who have already taken action.
Care2 Related Petitions:
Support the Safe Schools Improvement Act
Read more: civil rights, constance mcmillen, gay rights, itawamba county school district, lgbt rights, school, school authorities, school prom
Photo taken from the ACLU video campaign, no infringement intended.
This post has been updated. Please see the updates section of this post for further information.
Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may
not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.
Very cute. Nice to see the pig getting food from the fridge instead of him being part of the next me…
thanks nice story!
Ursula Margrit J. Are you gathering butterfly credits by bombarding us with pointless posts? I think…
186 comments
+ add your own"Constance McMillen has been able to give a voice to other lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender teens who have suffered, and continue to suffer, discrimination, prejudice and alienation in our schools."
Timmmmm S.....Psssssssst!!! (I don't think anyone is listening to you any more...we've all moved on. So sorry you lost.) Better luck next time.
LOLOL. I see some of your friends up in MI, OH, and IN got busted this week-end for some nasty government dealings... how lovely is that?! ... enjoy your ranting. At least our friends aren't sitting in jail, lololol. Talk about an oxymoron: Christian militia. LOLOL.
Homosexual Statistics
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1502263/posts
http://www.traditionalvalues.org/urban/two.php
http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexuality_Statistics
http://www.traditionalvalues.org/pdf_files/statistics_on_homosexual_lifestyle.pdf
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/homosexual_lies.htm
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/sep/07091201.html
http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/homosexuality/ho0075.html
http://www.adherents.com/misc/hsk.html
http://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/a02rStatistcs.html
I am very happy that Constance got her check for $ 30,000.00, good for her, she is so brave for stepping out for her tendencies, sorry RIGHTS, and for having such a brave father. Never be afraid or embarrassed of who you are. Way to go, girl.
"I think these comments are getting a bit mundane. Constance had her 15 min. of fame. and if she names names, I hope she is prepared to be sued unless she has consent :D"
I agree Mary it seems these people in here are beating a dead horse. What do they hope to accomplish. They continue to pat each other on the back and attack anyone who does not agree with them!
Oops! My bad.... Jonas SALK.... I must have been thinking "sulk," of which our negative posters are doing a lot. Cheers!
GLENNA!! Good Morning!!! Thank you for your salient comments... so true!
Fame whore...hmmm, that's a new one... Rosa Parks, Jonas Saulk, MLK, Jr., Health Care Bill....oh, I'm sure the list could go on and on but you get my drift. (Our chameleon must be sleeping in this morning, heh heh heh).
Great week-end to you all!!! Dakotahgeo
Thank you Glenna. Very well said!
Elinor, just what would you consider as a fame whore? Was Thomas Paine a fame whore when he wrote about freedom in the face of tyranny? What about Thomas Jefferson & Ben Franklin? When they put their names on the Declaration of Independence, they were saying that they were not going to stand by the status quo & be taxed without representation & if they had to, they would fight Britain for our freedom. What about Martin Luther King, Jr? Was he a fame whore when he made his famous speech about the mountaintop? It was unpopular and certainly outside of the norm. What about James Reeb, the Unitarian minister who was killed defending MLK and marching with him? A fame whore, too? What about Rosa Parks, should she have just moved to the back of the bus - and not pushed her "colored lifestyle" onto those poor white folk?
Why is it when a kid stands up for her rights - you condemn her. She has a 3.86 GPA. She doesn't do drugs. She doesn't drink. She doesn't sleep around. She now has a $30,000 scholarship. Which of those wonderful things makes her a fame whore?
What is wrong with some of you people? Just because she doesn't fit into your narrow minded, pigeon holed ideas of what is normal & acceptable - you are willing to overlook all that SHE is for what you think she SHOULD be, What a shame. You miss some very nice people that way.
login to add your comment
use your care2 login
add your comment
20