Deborah and Ariel Levy, the parents of a 4-year-old girl with Down Syndrome, have been awarded nearly $3 million by a jury. The Levys had sued an Oregon hospital after doctors at Legacy Health told them that prenatal tests said their child would not have the developmental disability, says KATU news. Late last week, jurors said that the “negligence of hospital workers [had] led to incorrect results.”
The couple, who have not commented publicly on their lawsuit because they are “worried about the backlash they could get over such a controversial topic,” sued the hospital for millions, the amount they say will be needed to care for their daughter during her lifetime. They contend that doctors at the hospital “repeatedly advised” them that a test of their unborn child had “definitely ruled out Down syndrome” and that other indicators were “not reliable.” The doctors, say the Levys, were “negligent in their performance, analysis and reporting.” Had they known their daughter would have been born with Down Syndrome, they would have aborted the baby.
The case brings up some very complicated issues about prenatal testing and disability rights. KATU quotes Patricia Backlar, a professor of bioethics at Portland State University, who notes the importance of prenatal testing as “you want to make sure you’re prepared as well as you can be in case something is awry.” The reading of such tests can, though be “complex,” she says. The Northwest Down Syndrome Association‘s Angela Jarvis-Holland also points out that, while there have been advances in prenatal genetic testing, there has been “no huge increase in good information on what life can be like” to raise a child with Down Syndrome.
Certainly more educational and other services exist now for children with Down Syndrome and other disabilities. Currently some 80 percent — even 90 percent — of parents who find out that their fetus has tested positive for Down Syndrome choose to terminate the pregnancy. With fewer children with Down Syndrome now born, some parents and disability advocates have been emphasizing the positive aspects of raising a child with a disability.
In a press release, Dr. Jeff Myers, the president of Summit Ministries, refers to the Levys’ “wrongful birth lawsuit” in criticizing a recent article in the Journal of Medical Ethics in which two Australian professors, Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva, argued that “after-birth abortion” should “be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled.” The professors cited Down Syndrome as an example, noting that ““such children might be an unbearable burden on the family and on society as a whole, when the state economically provides for their care.” Dr. Myers responds that such a “barbaric argument is the logical outcome of a pro-abortion stance” and that to say that a child “can be aborted—killed—because circumstances aren’t perfect will cast our society back into the eugenics debate that the Nazis exploited so effectively to kill those they deemed undesirable. ”
As the mother a child with disabilities, with autism, specifically, I more than understand the Levys’ fears about raising a child who will need care and extra support throughout her life.
Photo by Saucy Salad
Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may
not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.