START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
925,289 people care about Women's Rights

“Plus-Size” Model Crystal Renn Struggles To Keep Weight On

“Plus-Size” Model Crystal Renn Struggles To Keep Weight On

We’ve read over and over again about how runway models struggle to maintain their size 0 skeleton-like frames, but we’ve never heard about the struggles “plus-size” models endure in the same industry.

Weight struggles for “plus-size” models?

Some might think this seems like an oxymoron, but Ford Models’ recent interview with “plus-size” model Crystal Renn begs to differ.

In the video Renn reveals the tremendous pressure she feels to maintain her “plus-size” body type:

“I feel pressure probably more than any place from the public and the media. I think by placing a title on my head- which is plus-size- and then then the picture that these people have created in their mind about what plus-size actually is, I basically fail you just with that, because I couldn’t possibly live up to that.”

Renn is arguably the most recognizable “plus-size” model in the industry, working with major designers like Chanel, Dolce & Gabana, and Jimmy Choo. Maintaining this superstar “plus-size” body, however, has been a struggle for Renn who has spoken openly in the past about her battle with eating disorders.

“… at this point in my life I would actually have to have another eating disorder to live up to that [the public's] expectation. I had anorexia ultimately because someone else set the standard for me and I wanted to follow it and if I followed what the public wanted from me or what the media wants from me I would be doing the same thing. I would have a binge eating disorder.”

The problem herein lies in the fact that what the fashion industry deems “plus-size” and what the media and public deem “plus-size” (and even what you and I might deem “plus-size”) are two very different ideas.

While the fashion industry traditionally considers a size 10 to be “plus-size,” the public and media have a much larger perception of that body type, particularly because an average woman in the United States is actually a size 14.

For Renn this is a lose-lose situation. For the fashion industry she must maintain a size 10 but for the public and media a much larger body is expected when they hear that she is a “plus-size” model.

How can she possibly please both sides?

It’s impossible. And trying to do so would be a very unhealthy endeavor- one Renn refuses to take on as she herself has battled with negative body image and eating disorders.

“I think the most important thing we all need to know…is that it’s about individual health. You cannot tell if someone is healthy or where they are mentally from what’s going on on the outside because health is different for everybody at different times.”

I could not agree more and applaud Renn for speaking so openly about her struggles as a “plus-size” model.

Maybe if the fashions industry, the public, and the media dropped the “plus-size” title from models like Renn and everyone focused on the beauty of an array of different sizes and body types, Renn and other models could focus on being their most healthy selves instead of struggling to maintain a body type that is not theirs but instead fulfills the perception of those around them. (Hey, I can dream can’t I?)

Related from Care2:

Beauty Queen Loses Crown Over Eating “Too Many Tacos”

In Pepsi’s New Campaign, “Skinny” Means “Confident”

Facebook Use Leads to Negative Body Image and Eating Disorders

 

Read more: , , , , , , , , , ,

Photo by Mandiberg used under a Creative Commons license - http://www.flickr.com/photos/theredproject/2831350088/

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

95 comments

+ add your own
7:51AM PDT on Aug 9, 2013

Waste of time trying to please everyone. Do what's best for you.

1:17PM PST on Mar 6, 2011

Oh boo-hoo. The purpose of most "plus size" (translate, from modeling terms, to "normal") modeling is to show what a normal woman looks like, not to force oneself to maintain an unnaturally high weight. If, by maintaining a health lifestyle with healthy food choices and exercise, she's below industry "standards," no one's forcing her to be a model. Go find some other profession where you can maintain a health body weight for your own body.

1:30AM PST on Mar 6, 2011

I wonder why, as women, we can't just be considered to be beautiful as we are, rather than to fit unrealistic views. We all have something to add, and I like us the way we are. Strong, smart, unique, positive, AND good looking.

4:21PM PST on Mar 4, 2011

I don't see why we have to have these kinds of labels. I'm overweight and the hose I've bought for years change to an entirely different label once you get to a certain size and above - after that "L'Eggs" becomes "Just My Size". Why? Why can't the hose just be in the same box and under the same label?

2:27PM PST on Mar 4, 2011

Is that's all that's important in life - your size? What a narcissistic world to live in. And how boring!

9:13AM PST on Mar 4, 2011

Nowadays health doesnt count but the size..Crazy world!

4:06PM PST on Mar 2, 2011

If this is too much for her, I think Renn should find a new line of work. This is a field based entirely on how you look, everyone knows that going in. If it's too much, get out.

2:05PM PST on Mar 2, 2011

wow....so much to worry about!

9:43PM PST on Feb 28, 2011

I am older, and I remember that sizes have changed so much over the years. I used to have all my mother's dress patterns and, believe it or not, size 16 in the 50s had measurements of about 32-24-34. Patterns never did reflect sizes for ready-made clothes: they usually were one or two sizes smaller than what you might find in a department store (not a specialty shop). It also depended on how much the clothes cost. The more expensive, the larger the clothes were, and the larger the seam allowances -- so a 10 could be turned into a 12 or 14 by alteration by a clever seamstress (and the label still had the old size). I just don't understand how today's 10 (from what I've seen in the stores) can be "plus-sized", especially if the wearer is over 5'7" tall. But less expensive clothes (over $150) and those size 10s are not as big as as Oprah's supposed "size 14". Ms. Monroe was probably more like today's size 12 which definitely is not "plus". Remember movies and TV add at least 20 lbs.

9:28PM PST on Feb 28, 2011

What is so 'plus' about a size 14?

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free
CONTACT THE EDITORS

Recent Comments from Causes

I put them out hoping they catch mosquitoes and flys Marion, I can think back and everyone would have…

Know what's dangerous? A bunch a scared people with guns. We here at home are all as scared as a bunch…

Yes!! Thank God !!! ..... Merry Christmas to all !!!!

ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.