START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,275,960 people care about Politics

Republicans Don’t Want to Fund the Understanding of Human Behavior

Republicans Don’t Want to Fund the Understanding of Human Behavior

The National Science Foundation is an independent federal agency created in 1950 by Congress to “promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense.” It uses its $7.2 billion to fund research via grants at the nation’s colleges and universities. The NSF is the major funding source of federal backing for (non-medical) scientific research. They are the only federal agency whose mission is to provide support for all fields in science and engineering (except medical science). They support those that ask questions and seek answers.

This includes social, behavioral, and economic research.

When I decided to study sociology in college, I did so believing that the knowledge I would gain would help further my understanding of the world around me. With my plans to be an actress and a writer, I knew that this was a crucial skill in order to tell stories. With a special focus on social-psychology, my degree has been a great foundation for my career. The social sciences include several disciplines such as anthropology, political science, economics and social philosophy. Sociology, which is the scientific study of human social behavior, uses all of these disciplines to understand the origins, institutions, and actions of people. As my passion for politics grew, I saw the value of my degree grow exponentially since understanding human behavior is imperative when determining social policy.

Republicans in Congress want to make sure there is less understanding.

Last year, Representative Lamar Smith was appointed chair of the House science subcommittee. The Republican majority on the committee are very anti-science. On the committee is also Todd Akin of Missouri, who famously said that women have a way of preventing pregnancy when raped and doesn’t believe in evolution. Rep. Lamar Smith, who hails from Texas, also doubts that human beings really have any effect on climate change – if there really is any climate change.

He also doesn’t feel that things like social sciences, or peer reviewed research is important.

Last year he introduced a bill that would dramatically reduce the NSF’s budget and change how it makes conducts its reviews of research proposals. Currently the NSF relies on a panel of reviewers who have demonstrated expertise in their respective scientific fields to review the merits of proposal. It is then peer reviewed by another group of scientists. The comments and recommendations from these two steps are then processed by two different divisions of the NSF, after which a final decision is made. While the criteria varies depending on the research, the NSF looks at research that supports “discovery, learning, research infrastructure and stewardship and provides an integrated strategy to advance the frontiers of knowledge” across all scientific disciplines. During the peer review process, they look at the “intellectual merit” and “broader impact” on scientific community and society.

Smith only wants to fund research that promotes economic growth – such as engineering and chemistry – and makes sure that all research is in the national interest by making the U.S. competitive in the global market.

The Social, Behavioral, and Economics (SBE) division of the NSF is a small portion of its $7 billion budget, but funds nearly three-quarters of all social science research in the United States. Its mission “seeks to enhance our understanding of human, social and organizational behavior by building social science infrastructure, by developing social disciplinary and interdisciplinary research projects that advance knowledge in the social and economic sciences.” The results of this research are often intangible. There are no cures for cancer or miracle drugs to combat heart disease. Instead the research focuses on trying to understand how we live and why we behave as we do. Past SBE funded research has looked at how to stop cyber bullying, eye-witness identifications, values and morality in global finance, and violence in rural communities.

The public benefits of this knowledge don’t necessarily directly affect the bottom line, but it can greatly influence public policy.

Perhaps that is why Republicans wish to put a tighter rein on the division.

By requiring that each individual proposal specify how it benefits the national interest ignores the nature of social science. There are many research projects that don’t seem to have an immediate purpose to the greater good. But as any social scientist knows, it’s the interdependence of all the individual elements that determine how a society works. It is not enough to understand the prices of goods to determine a minimum wage. It is also necessary to understand how people spend their money and how they process information to make their buying decisions. It’s important to understand how women exist in the world and live their lives when determining how to design a community or developing health and education policies.

Most importantly, politicians need this information to better serve their constituents.

The Frontiers in Innovation, Research, Science, and Technology Act (FIRST Act of 2014) was formally introduced in March of this year. After a year of comments, the bill has kept most of its original ideas of the draft introduced last year. It freezes the budget of the NSF for two years and requires Congressional approval of any of the NSF Director’s decisions.

It also includes a 40 percent reduction for NSF’s social, behavioral, and economic division.

Read more: , , , ,

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

84 comments

+ add your own
12:41PM PDT on Aug 4, 2014

I'm sorry, I meant 99% (percent) not ? (question mark).

12:40PM PDT on Aug 4, 2014

So republicans don't want to study pain? That is the cause of 99? of our problems. WE all have different pain thresholds. What sends me into a tail spin, may not send you into one and vice versa...

10:23AM PDT on May 28, 2014

Good article. Thanks for posting.

10:23AM PDT on May 28, 2014

Does this really surprise anyone?

8:49AM PDT on May 5, 2014

The government has the money supply so technecaly , the government funds everything, so what is this percieved problem with 'government funding'? Do people really think it all comes from taxes?

6:44PM PDT on May 4, 2014

The less people know the easier they are to dupe.

11:33AM PDT on May 4, 2014

OH we all KNOW where the hot air is coming from LOLOL.

10:47AM PDT on May 4, 2014

Lisa L.,
Your implication was that without this funding, corporations would be directing all research. My switch to present tense was to emphasive how much research is currently being performed outside NSF funding. Your comment was over the top, unless you think that any research perform outside the reaches of the NSF is crap. Think about for a minute, and then decide if it is just hot air, like that laughing guy.

2:42AM PDT on May 4, 2014

ty

9:57PM PDT on May 3, 2014

"Most importantly, politicians need this information to better serve their constituents."

Now that is hilarious in the context of a Republicanus/Teabagger politician. They do not serve their constituents, only the Koch brothers and their ilk. The GOP want people in the dark, sheeple that can be trained to do what the GOP want done.

In Canada, PM Stephen Harper, our version of a Republlicanus/Teabagger, monkeyed with the national census thus limiting the amount of useful information used for policy and planning.

It maybe that the Republicanus/Teabaggers are so afraid they will shown as idiots that they try to limit human behaviour studies. Guess what, we already know they are idiots!

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free
CONTACT THE EDITORS

Recent Comments from Causes

Brian F. wrote: "Bush, Chaney, Rumsfeld, and all the neo con crooks and liars, who led us to the war…

Mike C asks if we'd lay our lives on the line for what cops get paid, which makes me have to ask if…

ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.