START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

Same Sex Couples Take Kansas to Task Over Tax Discrimination

Same Sex Couples Take Kansas to Task Over Tax Discrimination

Anyone who is married and who files taxes could have seen this coming from a mile away. The Defense of Marriage Act was struck down by the Supreme Court last year, taking with it unfair tax discrimination against married same sex couples. Now, same sex couples who are legally married in one of the 19 states, Washington D.C. or another foreign jurisdiction can file federal taxes as married. This is true for same sex couples who are married but live in a jurisdiction that does not recognize that marriage.

But what about state taxes? That’s where it gets more tricky. Since each state has their own tax guidelines, there isn’t one blanket rule for same sex married couples. In those states that don’t allow same sex couples to marry, otherwise married couples have to file their state taxes separately.

It’s easy to see why this is unfair. Doing your taxes blows, so having to do your taxes twice doubly blows. It’s more than just inconvenience, though. There are increased accounting costs, and it’s a reminder that, from a public policy standpoint, same sex couples are at best only considered kind of married.

Two Kansas couples — Michael Nelson and Charles Dedmon, and Roberta and Julia Woodrick – aren’t taking this kind of discrimination sitting down. In Kansas, there is both a statute and a constitutional amendment banning marriages between same-sex couples. Because of this, it’s unsurprising that the state requires same sex couples to file taxes as non-married individuals. So these two legally married same sex couples have filed suit against the Kansas Department of Revenue.

The guidelines were issued back in October. The guidelines don’t care if you’re legally married in another jurisdiction. If you’re married to someone of the same sex, you have to file separately.

This causes some problems, plaintiffs argue. It’s possible that by filing as single, they are filing a fraudulent tax return, which is a felony. Additionally, they claim that there is an added cost to preparing two tax returns and that being forced to do so demeans their marriages.

It’s not just that the whole thing is totally unfair. The state might actually be breaking the law:

“We are simply asking the state to follow existing Kansas law,” said David Brown, the Lawrence attorney who filed the suit. “Kansas law requires the state to use federal definitions of marriage for tax purposes, but the Department of Revenue is refusing to comply. My clients are asking the courts to order the Department of Revenue to follow the law.”

I’m not a tax expert by any means, but this does seem to be the case. According to statute, ”if both husband and wife are residents, and if their federal taxable income is determined on a joint federal return, their Kansas taxable income shall be reported and taxed on the basis of a joint Kansas income tax return.”

I have some hope that the state courts will find in favor of the plaintiffs. The courts have been the only branch of the state government in recent memory to be sympathetic to the plight of gay and lesbian couples. (The legislature can’t even muster the minuscule amount of courage it would take to repeal the state’s illegal sodomy law.) However, any adverse decision could be rendered moot by legislative action. Statutes can change. Faced with the option of either letting same sex couples file as married or taking time out of a busy schedule to change the law, I would not be surprised if lawmakers do the latter. It will certainly be an interesting case to watch.

Read more: , , , ,

Photo Credit: John Morgan via Flickr

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

52 comments

+ add your own
11:25AM PDT on Apr 22, 2014

Thanks for posting

3:54AM PST on Jan 10, 2014

ty

5:57AM PST on Jan 6, 2014

Jennifer H., it is not the IRS that is the problem. You need to reread the article. they are going after the KS STATE department of revenue.

It is Kansas that is denying them equal protection and treatment under the state tax law, not the fed.

4:32AM PST on Jan 6, 2014

Good for them! Thanks for sharing.

10:33PM PST on Jan 5, 2014

It should be the same for all !

10:03PM PST on Jan 5, 2014

Equality in all our states

7:24PM PST on Jan 5, 2014

Oh, I'd like to say I'm surprised it's come to this point, astonished this is even an issue--that anyone considers some marriages less than others. Unfortunately, it doesn't surprise me at all. It's human nature--people are different than you are, so you treat them horribly. It happened during the Inquisition, and it';s still happening now.

5:12PM PST on Jan 5, 2014

I am glad they are going after the IRS. It is about time that someone does. Taxation has never been fair.

4:48PM PST on Jan 5, 2014

I expect that if same sex married couples have found a loophole in the wording of the tax laws.

I would expect the codes to be reworded quickly.

This issue is near, & dear to the UnChristian Wrong heart.

Gotta keep the voters happy, to keep from getting primaried.

4:48PM PST on Jan 5, 2014

thanks

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Yeah, yeah, we know, Darlene doesn't believe in theories like herd immunity, gravity, relativity, evolution,…

Sandra: It is thought that passive immunity from the mother is only good for up to six months and after…

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.