START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
762,595 people care about Education

Scholastic Severs Some Corporate Ties

Scholastic Severs Some Corporate Ties
  • 1 of 2

Scholastic, the world’s largest publisher of children’s books, has announced that it is cutting back its InSchool marketing division’s corporate-sponsored projects, and creating a new review board to vet its materials.

Two months I wrote here that the company had pulled its biased coal curriculum, thanks to pressure from the media and from Care2 members. The curriculum, distributed to 66,000 fourth grade teachers, was sponsored by the American Coal Foundation, meaning that it somehow failed to mention any of the downsides of coal production: no negative effects of mining and burning coal, no toxic wastes, no lung disease, no greenhouse houses.

Scholastic Dumped Its Coal Curriculum – Now Others Are On The Chopping Block

Now Scholastic is taking further steps to loosen its ties with corporations.

Here’s what The New York Times reports:

“We have to improve our standards, and make sure there’s not a scintilla of anything that could be suggested to be biased,” said Richard Robinson, the president and chief executive of Scholastic. “The vast majority of our programs are not controversial, but once in a while there was a slip-up in editorial judgment.”

The company said last week that it would make a partial retreat from corporate and industry-sponsored programs and lesson plans it distributes free to teachers. It has already withdrawn some of its most controversial programs. But others, including a lesson plan sponsored by the American Egg Board recommending the health benefits of eggs, are continuing.

Scholastic InSchool, part of the company’s marketing division, distributes the materials, which are paid for by dozens of corporations and agencies like the Census Bureau. The InSchool unit accounts for less than 1 percent of Scholastic’s $2 billion in revenues, and fewer than two dozen of its 10,000 employees. The bulk of Scholastic revenues come from publishing books, like the Harry Potter and Hunger Games fiction series, and literacy programs like Read 180.

Shouldn’t Scholastic Abandon All Corporate Ties?

But wouldn’t it be better if Scholastic simply stopped producing any teaching materials paid for by a for-profit corporation or a trade group that promotes business interests?

  • 1 of 2

Read more: , , , , , ,

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

21 comments

+ add your own
2:28AM PDT on Aug 10, 2011

thank you for the article.

8:03AM PDT on Aug 8, 2011

My employer, Rethinking Schools, a non-profit publisher, was involved in the campaign to halt distribution of the coal curriculum. Our curriculum editor Bill Bigelow, wrote a detailed critique of the curriculum, for anyone who might be interested. http://rethinkingschools.org/archive/25_04/25_04_bigelow.shtml.

Also, here's a copy of the message we sent out to our followers about this latest development. It gives a little more background about what went on behind the scenes to get us to this point. http://www.rethinkingschools.org/opt-in/110803.shtml

7:02PM PDT on Aug 5, 2011

Thanks for sharing.

3:40PM PDT on Aug 5, 2011

As the mother of an 8 year old who buy's books from Scholastic all the time, I trust them to have and be unbiased books and other materials be neutral.

2:34PM PDT on Aug 5, 2011

The review board should be made up of scholars. And yes, they should sever all ties with corporations and if they have any, with any religious groups.

12:15PM PDT on Aug 5, 2011

Not sever ALL corporate ties. Accept Corp money, BUT, print fair, accurate, unbiased materials.

If they corporations do not like it, let them leave or break the ties then. I do not see why everything has to be all or nothing. Do th right thing, and let the chips fall.

11:46AM PDT on Aug 5, 2011

Thumbs up Britan.

9:07AM PDT on Aug 5, 2011

Given the money they made hand over fist by being the Harry Potter publisher, they don't need to be corporate shills anymore. About time!

8:52AM PDT on Aug 5, 2011

Good to see someone stepping away from the corporation crack pipe! Really, society will be better served if we can teach our children to love themselves, the animals on this planet and the planet itself.

Corporations have no interest in doing any of that, no matter what they trumpet... A perfect example in my book is the Holiday convenience store chains (here on the west coast of America), they now have "blue planet" gasoline..... Okay how is buying their fuel going to keep/make our planet blue?!?!?!

So if Scholastic wants to continue to supply our children with knowledge they should steer clear of all but the most environmentally/socially aware corporations to remain on "neutral" ground.

6:27AM PDT on Aug 5, 2011

Rather than severing all corporate ties, they should seek a sponsor for the other side of every issue for which they accept a corporate issued unit of lessons. I remember Bell Telephone company back in the old days sponsoring some really great TV specials about science. They had some top notch scientists working for them on issues that affect telephone transmissions. The TV specials may have been a way of winning the favor of their scientists with a chance to share the scientists' love of science with the public. Green wash didn't exist back then.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Signed. The whole counseling approach seems messed up to me. He needs individual psychotherapy and not…

All the best to the rangers and the governments who are trying to stop poachers. All the worst to the…

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.