Scientists Warn Federal Agency’s Plan Would ‘Result in Extinction of Red Wolves in the Wild’

Written by Dan Zukowski and reposted with permission from EcoWatch.

The same scientists who provided the population viability analysis to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for the red wolf have sent a rebuttal to the agency, accusing it of “many alarming misinterpretations” in its justification for removing most of the remaining animals in the wild.

Last month, the USFWS announced that it would recapture 32 of the 45 wolves in the wild and leave only those on federal lands. Currently, there are about 200 red wolves in captive breeding programs in the U.S. as part of the agency’s Species Survival Plan (SSP).

The letter, released to the public today, bluntly counters the agency’s proposal to recapture 32 wolves and place them in captive breeding programs:

“A singular focus on the SSP will no doubt result in extinction of red wolves in the wild.”

On Sept. 29, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina issued a preliminary injunction ordering the USFWS to stop capturing and killing—and authorizing private landowners to capture and kill—members of the rapidly dwindling population of wild red wolves.

“There’s no need to capture wild wolves in an effort to save the captive population, which is what the service contends,” said Defenders of Wildlife attorney Jason Rylander.

In their letter, the three scientists, from Lincoln Park Zoo, Point Defiance Zoo and Aquarium and the AZA Population Management Center, dispute the agency’s contention that the captive breeding program needs more wild red wolves for greater genetic diversity.

“The scientists’ letter makes clear that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s proposal to withdraw red wolves from most of their range in North Carolina has no scientific basis and confirms that the agency’s conclusion that the captive population is at risk is wrong,” said Jamie Rappaport Clark, president and CEO of Defenders of Wildlife.

A poll of North Carolina voters and the state legislature have shown strong support for the efforts to restore the red wolves to their native habitat. For now, the injunction remains in effect. No court date has been set for a hearing and it is not expected until sometime in 2017.

The letter asks the agency to “edit or append” its decision memo. “This letter confirms what red wolf advocates have been saying all along: capturing wild red wolves and placing them into captivity isn’t the answer. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service needs to recommit to red wolf recovery in the wild,” Clark said.

Photo Credit: Land Between the Lakes/Flickr

79 comments

Philippa Powers
Philippa Powersabout a year ago

Thanks.

SEND
Teresa W.
Teresa Wabout a year ago

thank you

SEND
Joanne p.
Joanne pabout a year ago

ty

SEND
Clare O'Beara
Clare O'Bearaabout a year ago

Why are wolves not introduced to the areas where there are supposed to be too many mustangs? Wolves and cougars used to thin the numbers by preying on old or sick creatures. Wolves also kept coyote numbers in check. Now horses are considered overpopulating and coyotes are so numerous as to be considered a pest, for all they eat pest species.

SEND
Clare O'Beara
Clare O'Bearaabout a year ago

If it's a matter of being captured or shot, living in captivity is better. But ideally land would be set aside where they could roam free.

SEND
Kathy S.
Kathy Sabout a year ago

What is NC doing? stop the madness,red wolves belong in the wild & they should be protected

SEND
sandy g.
Sandy Gabout a year ago

Our government sucks. No compassion for animals whatsoever.

SEND
M s
M sabout a year ago

if anything CAPTIVE WOLVES NEED to be RELEASED to add genetic variation to wild wolves you morons

SEND
M s
M sabout a year ago

DE FUND & SHUT DOWN FWS NOW They are made up of ranchers &hunters who want to exterminate all wildlife so their livestock can freely graze and decimate our land This will drive out all animal species.The land will die along with the animals STOP LIVESTOCK GRAZING REDUCE YOUR MEAT CONSUMPTION=less cattle=more wildlife left alone

SEND
Rosslyn O.
Rosslyn Oabout a year ago

Why can't they just leave them alone and ban the trespassing cattlemen? It is the wolves natural environment so they should be able to survive there with their natural gene pool if left alone and not threatened. Mother nature has been doing that job before humans got here. I'm sure she knows what she's doing!

SEND