START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
1,307,413 people care about Women's Rights

Senate Confirms Top Women’s Rights Attorney to Federal Bench

Senate Confirms Top Women’s Rights Attorney to Federal Bench

Written by Ian Millhiser

With her confirmation to the second highest court in the nation very early Thursday morning, Judge Nina Pillard should immediately rocket to the top of the Democratic shortlist of potential nominees to the Supreme Court. Though there are a number of Democratic judges who possess the youth, brilliance and legal credentials required from a new Supreme Court justice, Pillard brings something to the bench that is quite rare among judges — she’s won two of the most important civil rights victories to reach the Supreme Court during her career.

Pillard was a member of the legal team in United States v. Virginia, which eliminated the Virginia Military Institute’s discriminatory policies against women and cemented the rule that no law may engage in gender discrimination unless there is an “exceedingly persuasive justification” for doing so. Seven years later, Pillard argued and won Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs, an important case helping women (and men) with families to have a fair opportunity to participate in the workplace. (We could say many other things about Pillard’s record, but rather than repeat ourselves, please see our previous coverage here and here.)

Indeed, it’s likely that there is only one other judge currently on the bench who accomplished as much as a litigator for women’s rights as Judge Pillard did in her career as an attorney — Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Yet, while judges like Pillard and Ginsburg are rare right now, they don’t have to be much longer now that the filibuster no longer gives the Senate minority a veto power over judicial nominees. Nor is there a shortage of eminent attorneys — Pam KarlanPaul SmithDebo Adegbile — who have fought and often won major victories for gay rights, voting rights, racial justice and other important civil rights. The tragedy of Pillard and Ginsburg is that there does not need to be so few of them.

This post was originally published ThinkProgress

Read more: , , , , , , ,

Photo credit: Thinkstock

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
10:11AM PST on Dec 22, 2013

Excellent! I am so happy to hear about so many promising attorneys being recognized for their work in defending civil rights.

5:13AM PST on Dec 22, 2013

Good luck!

11:42AM PST on Dec 21, 2013


11:42AM PST on Dec 20, 2013


9:34AM PST on Dec 20, 2013


4:08AM PST on Dec 20, 2013


3:51AM PST on Dec 20, 2013

Tentaively a good thing - let' s see how it works out

11:19PM PST on Dec 19, 2013

thank you

7:57PM PST on Dec 19, 2013


7:53AM PST on Dec 18, 2013

Gee, all this over the Senate finally doing their job. The only they need to do is "Advise and Consent". Very simple.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Torturing animals for human greed, ego and morally terrible excuses eg artificial looks is sadism pure…

Don't be afraid to die. Fear living a life not worth living.

ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!