START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
1,188,152 people care about Women's Rights

Senate Won’t Fill Unprecedented Vacancies in the Federal Court System

Senate Won’t Fill Unprecedented Vacancies in the Federal Court System

In November, the Senate voted on and passed anti-filibuster laws that make it easier for Federal judges to be appointed. The Senate also changed its rule on cloture, which lowered the requirement for confirming a judicial nominee to a simple majority from a 60-vote supermajority.

In fact, these actions allowed the Senate to confirm Patricia Millett and Nina Pillard to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. Had they required the supermajority, neither of these women would have been appointed despite their excellent qualifications. The Senate was also able to confirm Robert Wilkins, an African American judge, to the D.C. District Court.

While this is a gain, there are a plethora of other options that senators can use to prevent the president from nominating judges that don’t require a filibuster. In fact, the general consensus is that some of these tactics are much more dangerous than filibusters which often receive national press and attention. The options left for senators are more quiet and don’t gain national attention. According to Women’s eNews:

Some refuse to attend hearings. Others refuse to cooperate with the president in nominating judges from their state. Or senators from the state of residence of a federal judicial nominee refuse to turn in blue slips containing their opinions of the nominee, thereby preventing nominees from receiving a hearing at all. White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler declared the blue-slip rule for judges more problematic than the filibuster, in part because it is a silent, unaccountable veto.

This is a considerable problem. The federal district and appellate courts are facing an unprecedented number of vacancies. 93 positions remain unfilled, and those vacancies considered judicial emergencies has risen 100 percent since 2008. This means that the American people living in jurisdictions where there are judicial emergencies are not able to have their cases ruled on in a timely fashion. To give you an idea of some of the issues that aren’t being heard, federal judges rule on issues impacting health care, immigration, marriage equality and the environment among many others.

Fortunately, President Obama has nominated women to federal judiciary positions more than any other previous president, and at twice the rate of former President George W. Bush. With more women and racial minorities in the judiciary system, the U.S. will start to have a more diverse court system that is reflective of the people living in this country. Unfortunately, however, the Senate is stalling on appointing many of those nominees. Women make up only 30 percent of federal judges, and it is time for that to change.

Here’s what you can do to help the process along. First, sign the petition below telling the Senate to stop stalling and to approve these diverse judges to the courts. Second, tell your senators to return blue slips and give the president names of judges. We must do all we can to stop this judicial emergency!

Read more: , , , , ,

Photo Credit: walknboston

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
3:16PM PST on Jan 30, 2014

It's time to fire all who can't understand their jobs in this republic. We need adults not spoiled children and I'm talking about BOTH parties.

11:58AM PST on Jan 30, 2014

Yes and every opposition has had to work with the President. THIS congress refuses rto do so.
They will NOT let the economy recover (except for the rich who have done amazingly well) until Obama is gone. The right has decdied liberal thought should simply not be allowed.

7:21AM PST on Jan 30, 2014

Retire the position, in which we the people will be poorly represented anyway given the minimal requirements that must be met.

Dangerous to leave the position vacant until a "suitable" candidate can be found guaranteed to rule favorably on issues near and dear to those who set them in place.

1:35AM PST on Jan 30, 2014


8:44AM PST on Jan 29, 2014

Actually Paul its CONGRESS that has made their NUMBER ONE GOAL since he has been elected to be a one term president to shit him down., But you go ahead and delude yourself into thinking Obama is the problem. Your Obama hate is well known and by now ignored.

Congress will do NOTHING to help Obama do anything period. Every bill he presented they tried to attach tax cuts for the wealthy to. Every bill they themselves presented had the same thing. There has been virtually NO NONE NADA attempt by this congress to ever compromise with Obama. They have held him in contempt from tthe very day he was elected. All the things that congress has done to neuter the President have been documented fully on this site over and over for the last 5 years. You can rewrite history if you wish…….but half of the shit is on video tape. The Right in Congress has wanted from day one for Obama to be a failed presidency. They have made absolutely NO bones about it.

8:39AM PST on Jan 29, 2014

Retire the position, in which we the people will be poorly represented anyway given the minimal requirements that must be met.

Dangerous to leave the position vacant until a "suitable" candidate can be found guaranteed to rule favorably on issues near and dear to those who set them in place.

6:02AM PST on Jan 29, 2014

Congress cannot accomplish much of anything until Obama really sits down to tries to work with them or the USA gets a new president.

12:19PM PST on Jan 28, 2014

Robert, I will believe what you say if and when Obama actually takes the time to negotiate, debate and discuss the issues HE wants to get passed. so far all I have seen is a MY way or the Highway attitude. that is NOT leadership, that is dictating policy, whining when you don't get YOUR way.

Every president has had to "work with" the opposition, Reagan had 8 years of Dem control of Congress and still managed to get a lot accomplished. Obama can't seem to be bothered with governing. All he knows is "this is what I want, now I will find a way to get it, regardless of what I have to do to get it." Sounding much like a spoiled child... which in many ways he has been treated that way his whole adult life, coddled and pushed way beyond his capability... so what should we have expected?

9:57AM PST on Jan 28, 2014

Obama doesnt WANT to rule by fiat……he is being FORCED to because the right will not compromise on ANYTHING!!!! They wont even vote for shit they have ALWAYS voted for……and when they get a Republican in the whitehouse they will vote favorably on those items once again. You are simply overcome with Obama Hate. I dont hate him or love him.
Very few liberals think he is the annointed one……..that is a name the right loves to use.

8:14AM PST on Jan 28, 2014

Sharon, have you even considered the fact that these representatives in Congress were hired to represent their constituents and that is what their constituents want as they oppose much of the legislation this administration is proposing and enacting through EO.

You can't tell me that Dems didn't do the same thing during Rep presidencies, or were you just oblivious to that fact since they were upholding YOUR beliefs.

Our system of government was designed to create a compromising through debate and discussion that no one in DC wants to do anymore. There has been so much finger pointing, and accusations of all kinds that defenses are up at their highest. You cant' work with people who are unwilling to have a discussion.

Obama wants to rule by fiat, and ANY opposition is viewed as obstruction, but no more obstruction that any president has had, he is just unwilling to get in the trenches and debate the ideas.. he prefers backroom discussion with his party about how they can "
get around" the opposition, never how can we can SELL our ideas to the public, because MOST of his ideas are denounced by the public, but they wnat them anyway, so they find ways around the system.

And yo wonder why Reps are not seen as cooperative... they have rarely ever been asked to be dealt with fairly by Dems, only as obstacles... that is NOT how you lead or govern in our system, and as a result you get very little accomplished. You would think by now Obama would have learned that les

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

I love this idea, we should be doing this with all of our old buildings!

I'm with Dianne D! Fence in and control human population -- then the animals would thrive!

Darryll G., If you weren't so proudly stupid and intent on farting your rightwing apologetics until…

ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.