START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

Snowquestration: How D.C. Fits In With The ‘Less Snow, More Blizzards’ Pattern

Snowquestration: How D.C. Fits In With The ‘Less Snow, More Blizzards’ Pattern

Written by Jeff Spross

Washington, D.C. is abuzz with the news that a new storm is sweeping down towards the mid-Atlantic seaboard, already dubbed “snowquester” (or “snowquestration” if you’re a grammar stickler) in honor of the nation’s latest budget debacle.

There’s a 50 percent chance the snowquester will dump over 5 inches of snow within the Beltway, and a 20 to 25 percent chance it will immobilize the city entirely. Given Washington, D.C.’s meager snowfall in recent winters, the snowquester’s impending arrival is understandably grabbing everyone’s attention.

It’s a “teachable moment” for diving into how Washington, D.C.’s weather specifically fits what we know about climate change.

One paradox that’s emerged from climate science in recent years is the “less snow, but worse blizzards” pattern. The Associated Press recently summed up the logic behind this: “A warmer world is likely to decrease the overall amount of snow falling each year and shrink the snow season. But when it is cold enough for a snowstorm to hit, the slightly warmer air is often carrying more moisture, producing potentially historic blizzards.”

Global warming is bringing us closer to the sweet spot where moisture in the air is maximized while temperatures remain low enough to cause snow. And recent studies have confirmed that snowfalls over the last 100 years in the United States, as well as those projected for the next 100, fit this pattern.

Jason Samenow over at the Washington Post decided to dig into whether D.C.’s weather specifically has lined up with the “less snow, more blizzards” pattern. Sure enough, it does:

In the 30 winters since 1984 (including this year, assuming we don’t miraculously get 14 inches of snow in the coming weeks), only 5 winters have had above average snowfall in D.C. – compared to 25 winters with average to below average amounts (15.4 inches or less). In 4 of the 5 winters with above average snowfall, the total was 2 to more than 3 times normal – or 30.1 to 56.1 inches (in 1987, 1996, 2003, and 2010). Or, put another away, the 25 snow-deprived winters averaged 9 inches of snow, the 5 snowy winters averaged 40 inches.

At the same time, D.C. has not seen accumulating snow in November for the last 16 years, the longest stretch on record. And the 30-year average for snowfall has dropped from 24 inches in 1918, to 18 inches in 1984, to 14 to 15 inches this year.

“Shorter snow season, less snow overall, but the occasional knockout punch,” Princeton University climate scientist Michael Oppenheimer told the AP. “That’s the new world we live in.”

It should be noted that it’s the wrong question to ask whether climate change “caused” this or any particular snow storm. The effects of global warming feed into and intensify a range of factors that contribute to more extreme weather. As with a baseball player on steroids, no one hit is “caused” by the steroids — but the use of steroids (a.k.a. global warming) causes the player (a.k.a. the climate) to break records at an unnatural pace. And the rate and severity of snow storms, floods, downpours, droughts, and forest fires have all been on the uptick in recent decades.

Admittedly, even if snowquester does its worst, the 2012-2013 winter season will remain in the “less snow” half of the pattern, given how little snowfall D.C. has already seen. But the above remains an important lesson that the effects of climate change are comprehendible, measurable, at least somewhat predictable — and, most importantly, they’re here.

This post was originally published by Climate Progress.

 

Related Stories:

The Shellfish Know Climate Change is Real

We’re on the Brink of the Worst Drought in 1,000 Years

Climate Survivor: “This is Affecting Everyone”

 

Read more: , , , , , ,

Photo: JoshBerglund19/flickr

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

27 comments

+ add your own
10:35AM PST on Mar 9, 2013

Thanks

6:49AM PST on Mar 9, 2013

Thanks for sharing.

8:46AM PST on Mar 8, 2013

thnx for this

10:54AM PST on Mar 7, 2013

It's the Gore Effect at work....and he doesn't even have to be there. The storms shut down the House hearings on "Global Warming".

4:23PM PST on Mar 6, 2013

I just have to laugh when I think of D.C. having snow. Back in 1980 we had a doozy. The school bus could hardly get my children home and the UPS man kept plowing the truck into the drifts so he could get through. That was up in the valley 60 miles outside of Washington.
The sad part is that Washingtonians don't know how to drive even in an inch of snow. We'll see how they fare this time.

2:11PM PST on Mar 6, 2013

I live in Boonsboro, Maryland (about 10 miles east of Hagerstown), and I can definitely tell you that there is ample evidence of climate change in our winters! The past two years, our snowfall has been WAY below average, and that was evidenced in today's weather as well! They were calling for over a foot for us, and all we got here was less than FOUR INCHES, most of which has already melted! Even growing up in Prince George's County near DC, I can tell you that winters had a LOT more snow when I was a kid than they do now!

It's not just winter weather-both spring and fall have both become shorter, and the summers are MUCH hotter than they used to be! July especially now has more 90+ days than it used to, and there are more days when the mercury ventures into the 100-degree zone as well, and that's before the heat index! You can't tell me that there's no such thing as climate change, because we're LIVING it!

1:29PM PST on Mar 6, 2013

informative, thank you

12:16PM PST on Mar 6, 2013

What say yee global climate change deniers? The future weather patterns are truly going to be destructive and devastating to all.

10:25AM PST on Mar 6, 2013

Thanks

10:10AM PST on Mar 6, 2013

When the short term finance looks so rosy for fossil fuel barons they put on their blinders so they don't have to see the future. I hope they don't have grandchildren. Or maybe they should. Then maybe it will be in their faces and then they will have to do something they don't want to do: Give up their easily earned money for the better of the planet. They obviously are impervious to it now. All they see is money.
Do they know something we don't know? Is the planet actually dying and the big wigs know this and so don't care about the future? They're getting what they can now. They want to sit on all their piles of money and watch the world collapse around them. "I'm the king of the castle".
Stupid idiots.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free
CONTACT THE EDITORS

Recent Comments from Causes

Ugh! Sounds disgusting! I know we need to deal with plastic waste, but surely this is not the best…

This has to go farther for me to even try out.

ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.