START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
582,041 people care about Real Food

Update: Stop Purchase Of 7 Million Pounds Of Pink Slime For School Lunches (Video)

Update: Stop Purchase Of 7 Million Pounds Of Pink Slime For School Lunches (Video)

March 16 Update:

Care2 Success! Over 11,000 Care2 members have so far signed our petition telling the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) to stop buying “pink slime” for use in school lunches.

Now the department has announced that schools that get their ground beef from the federal government will now have the option of buying it with or without “pink slime.”

In a statement issued yesterday, the USDA said that although the product is safe to eat, “due to customer demand, the department will be adjusting procurement specifications for the next school year so schools can have additional options in procuring ground-beef products. USDA will provide schools with a choice to order product either with or without Lean Finely Textured Beef.”

However, the problem remains that schools may not be able to find ground beef without pink slime, so we need to keep telling the USDA that the only acceptable ground beef is free of pink slime.

March 7

Last January, I reported here that McDonald’s, Burger King and Taco Bell had all announced that they were discontinuing the use of ammonium hydroxide, otherwise known as pink slime, in their beef.

In case you’re not familiar with this lovely term, “pink slime” is used to describe a ground-up combination of beef scraps, cow connective tissues and other beef trimmings that are treated with ammonium hydroxide to kill pathogens like salmonella and E. coli. It’s then blended into meat products like ground beef and hamburger patties. Sounds delicious, right?

Horrifyingly, just as these fast-food giants have agreed to get rid of the substance, the U.S. Department of Agriculture is buying 7 million pounds of pink slime for use in school lunches.

Pink Slime Endorsed By National School Lunch Program

Yes, you read that correctly.

Just this week, pink slime got a de facto endorsement from none other than the USDA, which plans to keep buying millions of pounds of it for use in the National School Lunch Program.

According to The Daily, pink slime made up 6.5 percent of the beef purchased by the USDA for the school lunch program last year.

From The Daily:

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s continued purchase of so-called pink slime for school lunches makes no sense, according to two former microbiologists at the Food Safety Inspection Service.

“I have a 2-year-old son,” microbiologist Gerald Zirnstein told The Daily. “And you better believe I don’t want him eating pink slime when he starts going to school.”

It was Zirnstein who first coined the term “pink slime” after touring a Beef Products Inc. production facility in 2002 as part of an investigation into salmonella contamination in packaged ground beef. In an email to his colleagues shortly after the visit, Zirnstein said he did not “consider the stuff to be ground beef.”


For retired microbiologist Carl Custer, a 35-year veteran of the Food Safety Inspection Service, the idea of mixing in BPI’s Lean Beef Trimmings into more nutritious, pure ground beef was itself problematic.

“We originally called it soylent pink,” Custer told The Daily. “We looked at the product and we objected to it because it used connective tissues instead of muscle. It was simply not nutritionally equivalent [to ground beef]. My main objection was that it was not meat.”

Both men say the product was approved as safe by the USDA over their objections.

Pink Slime As Part Of Healthier School Lunches?

What is going on with the National School Lunch Program? Just over a month ago, as I wrote here, the USDA unveiled final rules for healthier school lunches and breakfasts, with the help of First Lady Michelle Obama. This after a full year of deliberations on the topic.

In light of these new regulations, pink slime makes no sense, in addition to being dangerous for the health of our nation’s children.

Take Action Now!

If you think this is outrageous, please click here to sign our petition calling on the USDA to do the right thing and extend their new rules to include a ban on the use of “pink slime” beef in school lunches.

Watch this video, and you may never eat a hamburger again:

Related Stories

Care2 Success! No more Pink Slime For McDonalds, Burger King, Taco Bell

Michelle Obama Helps Debut Healthier School Lunches

Should You Be Worried About McDonalds Giving You Cancer?

Read more: , , , , , ,

Photo Credit: screenshot from Fast Food Nation

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
7:57AM PDT on Apr 19, 2012

This just turns my stomach. I really wish I lived on my own farm so I could grow my own food

10:41AM PDT on Apr 10, 2012

What we have all been exposed to here is a classic example of media sensationalism aimed at ratings rather than facts. Let's all be good consumers and educate ourselves before we jump on the ban wagon. There are a plenty of credible sources out there we can use to make our own decisions. "A well informed consumer has the tools to, and will, make good decisions".

2:17PM PDT on Apr 5, 2012

Jennifer, if it's safe for pet food it's also safe for humans.

And, not, meat does not make for good fertilizer.

BTW, have you any idea as to what goes into sausages or scrapple?

6:07AM PDT on Apr 5, 2012

The idea that they can sweep garbage off of the floor, spray it with disinfectant, then feed it to us is just INSANE. The stuff that goes on the floor is scraped up and then has to be disposed of. It is common in our society to try to turn waste products into something useful. The just took a seriously wrong turn here. Perhaps some other uses could be found that would keep this stuff out of landfills, it could be used for per food or fertilizer for example.

6:30PM PDT on Mar 29, 2012

John said "I'm pretty certain the statement "in addition to being dangerous for the health of our nation’s children" is incorrect."

You are correct; said statement is incorrect.

3:02PM PDT on Mar 29, 2012

Petition signed!

6:30AM PDT on Mar 29, 2012

I agree it doesn't sound appetizing, but I'm pretty certain the statement "in addition to being dangerous for the health of our nation’s children" is incorrect.

9:35PM PDT on Mar 27, 2012

I'm betting that few if any of those here have a clue as to how real sausage and pon haus, aka scrapple, is made.

It's all of those scraps, less the chemical treatment to kill pathogens.

9:36PM PDT on Mar 26, 2012

Thank God I use home based learning... I control the food, and it's all natural and home made. That's just freaking gross.

I accidentally voted no, because I thought it was asking if we ought to ban it, not refuse to ban it.

7:29PM PDT on Mar 23, 2012

Yes! Thank the lord! for Care2.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

"Let’s be clear: Climate science is not an opinion." This goes SO far beyond teaching climate…

Having a degree in Geography and Environmental studies, I find this article to be a bit silly. First…

meet our writers

Julie M. Rodriguez Julie M. Rodriguez is an arts, green living, and political writer based in San Mateo, CA. Her work... more
ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.