START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
1,346,284 people care about Politics

Tampa GOP Convention ‘Looming Disaster’ – With Added Guns

Tampa GOP Convention ‘Looming Disaster’ – With Added Guns

The National Lawyers Guild (NLG) has warned that the August Republican convention is on course to be a ‘disaster’ because of protest restrictions — as the city fails to get concealed weapons banned from the convention area.

Last month we reported how Florida’s lax gun laws, as written by the National Rifle Association, will mean that pistols firing water are banned during the Convention — but concealed pistols firing bullets are fine.

The city’s proposed ‘clean zone’ (now ‘event zone’) around the Convention Center has a banned items list, which runs from air pistols to water pistols and also includes terrifying items such as masks, plastic or metal pipes, hair spray, mace, placards and string more than six inches long.

Tampa had concluded that, although it could force people to wear loafers (as shoelaces are generally longer than six inches), because Florida law doesn’t allow cities to ban concealed weapons from any public areas, it couldn’t do anything about them.

Said Tampa Mayor Bob Buckhorn:

“You know, isn’t this the stupidest damn discussion? You think about it. I’m going to ban squirt guns, but I can’t ban hand guns. I wonder sometimes if the NRA hasn’t high-jacked the Florida Legislature. …”

But then they found a loophole which meant that law enforcement could get what they wanted, which is guns banned for the protection of Republican convention goers and those protesting them. Problem was that that loophole was to ask Florida Governor Rick Scott to make an exception, as it turned out that state law allowed, and not only did Scott say no, he said no within a few hours of receiving the request. He couldn’t even be seen to be considering it.

Scott’s argument was that not allowing concealed weapons was removing one freedom too many (banning string is OK though, freedom is apparently unaffected) and that having possibly hundreds of gun-carrying fired-up protesters near the objects of their ire actually meant Tampa would be even safer.

The NLG says that Tampa’s proposed string-banning ordinance (which covers a large area of the city, including several residential areas) lays out a militaristic view of crowd control and would drastically and unconstitutionally restrict protests. It contains a one hour time limit on demonstrations and protesters fear they will be pushed far from sight or sound of the Convention.

The NLG warns that the proposed ordinance could “scar the city’s reputation and drain its pocketbook.”

Over the past decade, NLG lawsuits have successfully challenged police abuses stemming from similar ordinances, bringing hangovers to hot-tempered host cities in the form of costly litigation and multi-million dollar settlements. Most recently, the City of Chicago agreed to pay out $6.2 million to hundreds of protesters falsely arrested during a 2003 anti-Iraq War protest.

In their letter to the city council, the NLG write:

In case after case, the NLG has documented problems resulting from aggressive policing,supported by ill-informed local governments, of peaceful mass assemblies. History has shown us that special ordinances passed in anticipation of National Special Security Events such as the RNC are not only often unconstitutional, but have also repeatedly failed to enhance public safety. The vast majority of any violence seen at demonstrations in the United States is not carried out or caused by demonstrators, rather it is undertaken by police who are trained to see protesters as inherently criminal, and are then deployed with so-called less-lethal weaponry and the power of false arrest. We hope that the City of Tampa will take seriously our observation that police overreaction and the curtailment of First Amendment activities run directly counter to the safety and rights of event participants. The militarization of these events in the past has resulted in the costly and violent curtailing of free speech and has been detrimental on a number of fronts, from huge costs during hard economic times to the tarnishing of host cities’ reputations.

Organizers from the Coalition to March on the RNC expect as many as 5,000 demonstrators from all over the country August 27.

Related stories:

GOP Convention: Water Pistols Are a Threat, Actual Guns are OK

New Shocking ‘Stand Your Ground’ Case, But Florida Unlikely To Revisit Law

Zimmerman a “Poster Child” For Gun Lobby

Read more: , , , , , , ,

Photo credit: Map of Tampa's proposed Event Zone for Republican National Convention

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
2:42PM PDT on May 7, 2012

Sounds like a recipe for disaster.

1:21PM PDT on May 7, 2012

Might be interesting if crazy Ron Paul supporters have a "High Noon" standoff with crazy Mitt Romney supporters....
all others STAY AWAY. FAR, FAR AWAY.
We do not NEED "protestors" at the Rethug Convention.

It won't prove anything, or "draw attention to" anything not already "drawn attention to"; or any of the other traditional "reasons for protest".
Let the only "protestors" at the Rethug Conventions, be crazy and suicidal and leave the rest of us alone. {Or, let armed Tea Partiers be the protestors!}
"Progressives" stay home. Keep away. Keep out of gun range.
Armed paranoids. What a treat.

That is my advice to the Occupy Movement:
DON'T try to "Occupy" Tampa on those days -- NO good purpose would be served!

9:15AM PDT on May 7, 2012

let all the repucklicans bring their guns and hopefully they will shoot each other

7:29AM PDT on May 7, 2012

What a sad state of the Republic.

12:12AM PDT on May 7, 2012

I see saras hunting trip where it took her 5 shots to his a caraboo that was standing still, dick chaney hit his lawyer when duck hunting. Let the all have guns that can't hit their target. I guess thats why they have to reload. Democrats who own guns can hit their targets. I am not worried about a bunch of republican guns. But medical staff should be on hand for all those who shoot their foot, and those that don't know what goes up comes down faster.

10:16PM PDT on May 6, 2012

people with carry permits aren't the problem. it's felons that buy illegal guns and use them to rob and kill that are the problem. no law stopping people form carrying guns will stop them. i refuse to be unarmed when felons have weapons. cops can't protect you they can only investigate your murder.

7:34PM PDT on May 6, 2012

thank you!!

4:01PM PDT on May 6, 2012

"Holy molly, Batman" says Robin. "It might be Chacago 1968 all over again".
Thanks for the article and info Paul.

3:33PM PDT on May 6, 2012

"Bring lawters, guns and money..."

12:08PM PDT on May 6, 2012

You will never take away out guns, NEVER! Only criminals will then have guns and that will not be tolerated.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Ridiculous, recuse gay judges for gay related cases, recuse female judges in a female related cases,…


ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK


Civil Rights


Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights


Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.