Teachers With Guns Too Risky, Say Insurance Companies

In the weeks and months after the mass shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newton, Connecticut last year, communities across the nation were once again faced with questions of how to ensure their children’s safety in the wake of such horrific violence.

Outrage inevitably focused on gun control. A few states discussed new measures, and fewer moved forward. Congress even got around to discussing it…but not passing any legislation.

Of course, the NRA knew the solution to the problem of school shootings: more guns.

They came up with a proposal that included arming school personnel – including teachers – in order to stop raving lunatics with automatic weapons. In their mind, gun free school zones were the problem that needed to be solved.

Unlike gun control measures, several states were more than happy to explore the NRA’s suggestion, even working with the organization to create legislation. In all, more than thirty states enacted legislation which allowed school personnel to carry guns.

School districts are given the option to do so or not. Many that are considering adopting the laws are running into roadblocks, though – from insurance companies.

Kansas was one of the states that felt it was a good idea to allow teachers to carry concealed weapons into classrooms.  However, the largest insurer of school districts in the state, EMC Insurance Company – which covers 85-90 percent of the districts – refuses to renew coverage for any district that adopts the policy. Two other insurers have also refused coverage.

The insurers note that it’s not a political move.  They believe there’s an inherent risk when non-security personnel carry firearms around children.

Because what could go wrong?

Tennessee is also a state that is weighing costs associated with having school personnel packing heat. Thus far only one district is even considering it, but the state’s main insurer still hasn’t made a decision on whether to insure.

An insurer’s job is to measure risk and put a monetary value on that risk. In some cases, they feel the risk is worth it, if a district is willing to pay.

Texas has had laws that allow personnel to carry firearms in schools since 2007 and have been able to keep their districts insured. Of course, Texas also limits the amount insurers have to pay out in claims, the result of often touted (and misrepresented) tort reform. There’s nothing like taking a risk when there is none.

Indiana also had a law on the books that allowed staff to have firearms. A new law that went into affect this month designates Indiana schools gun free zones, making it a felony for anyone to carry a firearm on school grounds. The law exempts authorized people designated as security personnel.

This means that if a school designates the seventh grade history teacher as authorized security personnel, he can be armed.

As Bloomfield’s school superintendent Dan Sichting said in a recent school board meeting, “I’m not sure it’s a good idea for this board to appoint a staff member to carry weapons.”

Fellow school board member, and local insurance agency owner John Mensch also pointed out the risks – including higher insurance premiums. In addition, there are costs associated with training staff for the gun permits, not to mention how to respond in situations in which they would need to use their guns.

Like the training actual security personnel undertake.

In the end, few districts are adopting the policy. Those that have are largely located in rural areas where response time could be lengthy. Still, even if the districts want to arm their teachers, most of them don’t want to bring a gun to school if permitted.

Could it be they have enough on their plate with things like actual teaching?

154 comments

Jim Ven
Jim Ven2 months ago

thanks for the article.

 .
Past Member 4 months ago

This post is really valuable that designed for the new visitors. Pleasing work, keep on writing. what is my whole life insurance policy worth

Tom C.
.8 months ago

Hi Dear, have you been certainly visiting this site daily, if that's the case you then will certainly get good knowledge.whole life insurance

 .
.8 months ago

Thankfulness to my dad who informed me relating to this blog, this website is really amazing.car insurance quotes

Frans Badenhorst
Frans Badenhorstabout a year ago

thanks Crystal...I am thinking how ridiculous this headline would sound 20 years ago.... times are a changing.....

Sheena M.
Sheena M.about a year ago

I hope you will share such type of impressive contents again with us so that we can utilize it and get more advantage. Auto insurance

Edytheortega E.
Past Member 2 years ago

If you should be opting for finest contents like me, just visit this blog site daily because it provides the feature contents, thanks.

health insurance quotes maryland

Sarah Hill
Sarah Hill3 years ago

Why do we allow insurance companies to dictate to us what we can and can't do?

Cletus W.
Cletus W.3 years ago

Oh, and by the way, I have very little problem with "anyone not 100% like" me. If they have a differing opinion, I enjoy hearing their cogent arguments for it based on facts. I have plenty of freinds up and down the political spectrum.

However, I do NOT appreciate hearing a verbatim recital of the mindless talking points someone was given by their hate-radio media lords who do their thinking for them. I do not appreciate hearing sophomoric HYPOCRISY substituted for independent thought. I do not suffer mindless rightwing drama queens posing as "conservatives".

It is intellectually lazy to say that all you saw were "cheap shots" in my posts; so you might want to read my comments over again. Your reading comprehension fell short of the substance that confronted it.

Cletus W.
Cletus W.3 years ago

Oh, so now the Teatard claims he wants to "compromise". Anybody is free to go read the previous posts of this person, and see if it something that you'd like to "compromise" with. As long as you agree to live in a rightwing fairytale, he will be happy to "compromise" with you.

Son, again, you wouldn't know a true conservative if one shat on your empty head.

I have never IDed myself as superliberal. In fact I have more conservatism in my pinkie than you have in your entire body. True conservatives aren't deluded drama queens who run from cogency like the plague. You'd best keep your head away from me.