START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
2,099,358 people care about Politics

The Bottom Line: A Better Way to Manage Fish

The Bottom Line: A Better Way to Manage Fish

In 1996, I worked in the fisheries service at NOAA. That year, Congress passed legislation to amend the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the primary law that governs our nation’s ocean fish. The updated law established an important mandate for the agency: conserve fish. Our previous goal, decades long, was simply to promote fishing.

Along with subsequent reforms to the act, the legislation spurred many years of hard work by NOAA and advocates for sustainable fishing. The United States is now on the path to end overfishing and rebuild long-depleted species.

Already, 2013 is shaping up to be an important year for the health of our nations’ fisheries. NOAA recently concluded a public comment period on a wide range of policy issues that could determine the future course of U.S. fisheries management. We may see new proposed rules within the next six months.

Some of these proposals would take us backward, with costly new delays and exemptions that could allow overfishing and reverse conservation gains. Other proposals offer an opportunity to improve the health of our oceans, by managing our fisheries as part of the larger ecosystem. This holistic approach — often called “ecosystem-based fisheries management” — looks beyond the health of individual species to also consider the food and habitat they rely upon. More than 46,000 public comments urged NOAA to advance conservation reforms such as limiting catch levels for important prey species to help ensure healthy populations of large predatory fish.

“Ecosystem-based fisheries management” may sound wonky, but it is not a new idea. In 1871, the head of the newly established U.S. Commission of Fish and Fisheries (the precursor to today’s fisheries service), Spencer Fullerton Baird, launched some of the nation’s first marine ecology studies. Baird recognized that studying only single species “would not be complete without a thorough knowledge of their associates in the sea, especially of such as prey upon them or constitute their food.” He urged federal officials to consider the complex connections between fish and the ocean environment.

NOAA has come a long way over the past 140 years. In 2012, it achieved a historic milestone by establishing science-based catch limits to end and prevent overfishing on all ocean fish species managed by the regional fishery councils. It has also made great strides in rebuilding depleted fish populations such as mid-Atlantic summer flounder, Pacific lingcod and Atlantic scallops.

As the agency looks to the future, it should not revert to the failed policies (as described in my earlier posts) that shortchanged the long-term health of our oceans and left us a legacy of overfishing,

NOAA should heed the thousands of citizens who have asked it to move forward to manage fish comprehensively by protecting the habitats they depend on and the food they eat. This is an invaluable opportunity to apply the ecosystem-based approach that Baird envisioned almost 150 years ago to manage and conserve fish in the 21st century.

Related Stories:

Don’t Remove Protection When Cod Need It Most

Success! “Most Important Fish in the Sea” Wins Historic Protections

Saving Small Fish Now Will Pay Off Later

Read more: , , , , , , ,

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
8:31AM PDT on Mar 22, 2013

Thank you The Pew Charitable Trusts, for Sharing this!

2:22PM PST on Feb 26, 2013

Thank you for sharing.

3:19AM PST on Feb 1, 2013

NOAA are to be congratulated for coming such a long way, but I still fear for the future of our oceans.

1:29PM PST on Jan 27, 2013

thanks for sharing

6:17AM PST on Jan 19, 2013

There are undoubtedly other planets around other stars which have fish, forests and wildlife and pristine ecosystems untouched by human monsters, thankfullly current human primitive technology cannot even hope to reach them but I would also do anything in my power to prevent humans from reaching those planets. Pity for this once beautful earth though that humans are infecting and destroying it.

8:32PM PST on Jan 15, 2013

Stop the overfishing.........period.

9:02AM PST on Jan 14, 2013


11:10AM PST on Jan 13, 2013

We can always used "better ways" to do things...

9:40AM PST on Jan 13, 2013


2:36AM PST on Jan 13, 2013

Managing fish? They can manage themselves. What is really meant is "managing the exploitation of fish". We don't have to kill fish, or any other animal we share the earth with, we could all be vegetarian and make a number of gains. To me it's a no-brainer, but to others, it's simply insatiable greed.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

A positive outcome from a very negative disaster.

I wonder if it is a myth that there is an inverse relationship between the number of guns red-blooded…

ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!