START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
2,604,109 people care about Environment & Wildlife

The Bottom Line: Changing Course for America’s Oldest Fishery

The Bottom Line: Changing Course for America’s Oldest Fishery

Note: This is a guest post from Lee Crockett, director of U.S. fisheries campaigns for The Pew Charitable Trusts.

“The fish just aren’t there.”¯ This simple observation from Cape Cod fisheries manager Tom Dempsey to the Associated Press sums up the challenge of decreasing cod populations.

Recent scientific studies estimate that cod populations are at or near record lows. But this serious problem has not stopped the New England Fishery Management Council from proposing to end protection of their waters off the New England coast, a move that will make it even harder for cod — a fish that helped build the region’s economy — to recover.

It is difficult to overstate the importance of cod to New England. America’s oldest fishing ports grew and thrived because of once-abundant schools of the species. “The sacred cod”—a wooden carving—hangs in the Massachusetts statehouse. And, of course, there is the famous cape named for the fish.

But Cape Cod fishermen have largely given up on their home’s namesake. Cod averaged more than $3 per pound at auction for much of 2012—a very high price. But the catch from nearby Georges Bank has been so paltry that fishermen barely landed one-third of their allotted quota.

A Pew graph of the percentage of cod quotas caught 2010-12

Why are cod and many other species of groundfish, or bottom dwellers, struggling to recover? Decades of heavy fishing depleted their numbers and damaged the ocean ecosystem. These fish now face additional challenges from climate change as New England waters hit record high temperatures in 2012.

At the last meeting of the council in late January, grim reality set in among officials. “We’re just headed toward oblivion,”  John Bullard, regional fisheries administrator for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, said in reference to the scarcity of cod. “We have to change course.”

Despite considerable pressure from the seafood industry and its allies in Congress to allow overfishing to continue, the council held firm and approved painful but necessary cuts in the catch limits. These new limits for cod and other important groundfish are supported by the best science, and they follow the proven path for rebuilding fish populations as laid out in the nation’s primary fishery law.

While the catch limits are an important step in the right direction, other proposals approved by the council risk further harm to an already battered ocean ecosystem. For most of the past two decades, New England’s groundfish benefited from a network of areas closed to most bottom trawling and dragging. Created after fish populations crashed in the 1990s, these areas cover more than 8,000 square miles, sheltering spawning and juvenile fish, and allowing seabed habitats to recover from decades of damage. These protections played an important role in the recovery of some species, including scallops. Scallops now make New Bedford, Massachusetts the nation’s richest fishing port.

A screenshot of an interactive Pew map

Learn More: Explore an interactive map at www.pewenvironment.org

Yet, in a move advocated by the owners of large vessels in the New England fleet, the council passed a measure that will end protection for more than half these areas. Roughly 5,000 square miles—the size of Connecticut—could be open to bottom trawling.

Author and noted marine biologist Callum Roberts recently wrote that opening the protected zones will be disastrous because a “linchpin of fishery recovery”¯ could be “wiped out in less than a season’s fishing.”¯

The council’s proposal to open these protected areas to bottom fishing now rests with officials at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Their decision will test their commitment to truly set a new course for one of America’s most storied fish—and one of its most historic fishing grounds.

 

Related Stories:

Don’t Remove Protection When Cod Need It Most

10 Amazing New Animal Species Discovered in 2012

Saving Small Fish Now Will Pay Off Later

 

Read more: , , , , , , , ,

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

87 comments

+ add your own
8:42AM PDT on Apr 3, 2013

thanks for sharing

8:29AM PDT on Mar 22, 2013

Thank you The Pew Charitable Trusts, for Sharing this!

6:42PM PDT on Mar 19, 2013

Well said Mark D

6:02PM PDT on Mar 10, 2013

Linda M. don't start repeating Canada's government propaganda about the seals now, Nobody in the sane world sympathizes with the sadistic Canadian urges to make a quick profit torture poor seals while they peddle their twisted psychobabble propaganda to the world. The diet of seals is 90% the predators of cod, such as rays and squid. What does that tell small canadian minds? That if you destroy the population of seals (which btw have been part of a balanced ecoystem for millions of years and have been doing fine without compromising the large populations of cod and without psycho bloodthirsty convicts escaped from european jails rampaging through their habitat) after using factory trawlers to wipe out the cod populations in insane outbursts of Canadian government greed, that causes a predator explosion, which wipes out the last remaining cod populations and they NEVER recover.

3:20PM PST on Mar 4, 2013

Had the Cod been managed in the first place - they might be in larger numbers now and then everyone could be happy!! Sad that greed makes it had to do the right thing!

2:32PM PST on Mar 4, 2013

Must stop

9:59AM PST on Mar 4, 2013

Uh...lets see ....

1.over fishing
2.ocean water acidifying
3.Plastics/garbage in the waters
4. coral reef is dying
5. oil spills
6. human sewage from ships.
7. Fukishima radiation poisoning

.......yeah, the fish aren't there.....and we could leave them all alone and let them rebuild their own numbers, but will it happen? Will the fishing boats stop over fishing the waters? Will humans stop dumping in the oceans? Will the rivers stock up again, and return to clean?

Not in my lifetime! I can pray, but I don't see it happening.

Why? Too many climate deniers in government!

9:55AM PST on Mar 4, 2013

thx:)

9:49AM PST on Mar 4, 2013

Grazie per le informazioni.

8:47AM PST on Mar 4, 2013

It's ironic that this article appears within a day of another article proclaiming the saving of seals, their uncontrolled population being the second reason for the near extinction of cod. While Canadian fisherman have been operating under a strict moratorium causing many Newfoundlanders to leave their province and roots for work elsewhere, Europeans, Spanish and Portuguese fisherman in particular, have been illegally fishing in these waters for decades. The problem is not as easily solved as it seems.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

I saw the data elsewhere and felt rather lucky to have dodged the pregnancy bullet. This makes it all…

"I hope to make people realize how totally helpless animals are, how dependent on us, trusting as a child…

meet our writers

Lindsay Spangler Lindsay Spangler is a Web Editor and Producer for Care2 Causes. A recent UCLA graduate, she lives in... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.