START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
2,583,609 people care about Environment & Wildlife

The Bottom Line: How Investing in Our Fisheries Pays Off

The Bottom Line: How Investing in Our Fisheries Pays Off

 

Note: This is a guest post from Lee Crockett, Director of Federal Fisheries Policy at the Pew Environment Group.

Sometimes, an idea comes forward in Washington that actually brings together people who normally disagree. The Fisheries Investment and Regulatory Relief Act (FIRRA) of 2012 does that and more. This bipartisan bill would provide financial support to fishermen and improve management of our oceans. Restoring our depleted fish populations would create jobs, protect existing ones and add billions to the U.S. economy.

After decades of working with some of America’s leading commercial and recreational fishing groups, I’ve found that although we might differ on how our marine resources should be managed, we are on common ground when it comes to the need for dedicated funding for sound science and management.

On March  12, 2012, Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass.), Olympia J. Snowe (R-Maine), John D. Rockefeller (D-WV), Scott Brown (R-MA), and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) introduced the FIRRA (S.2194). Reps. Barney Frank (D-MA) and Frank Guinta (R-NH) are expected to introduce a companion bill in the House. This bill would redirect approximately $100 million in existing funds from duties on imported fish products each year to key programs that are critical to sustainably managing marine resources and aiding the fishermen and communities dependent on them. And a growing chorus of voices from around the country — including the Pew Environment Group — is speaking up in support of this much-needed legislation.

In 2011, Pew joined 246 groups and businesses in signing a letter asking Congress to place a priority on funding for fisheries data collection in fiscal year 2012. We also met with congressional staff members and delivered photos of constituents from around the country and all walks of life, demonstrating the diversity of people who view funding for fisheries data collection and science as a good investment.

Although annual appropriations are critically important, we also need stable, dedicated funding to uphold the science and management that serve as the foundation of healthy fish populations and thriving businesses. Thanks to the foresight of key congressional leaders, we finally have the opportunity to establish such support with this legislation.

How the Investment Act Would Work

Since 1979, a portion of the duties levied on imported fish products have been transferred into the general operating account of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) on an annual basis. The FIRRA would ensure that these funds (which the government estimates at $124 million in the upcoming fiscal year) are used for critical research, monitoring, and management programs, as well as provide valuable assistance to fishermen and their communities.

This bill would create a regionally-based grant program that would direct approximately $70 million a year to vital, regionally important projects. The eight regional fishery management councils would be responsible for identifying investment priorities and recommending grants for each region, ensuring that funds target important regional needs. The remainder of the funds would be available for NOAA to use for special fishery needs and problems, including providing disaster assistance, improving shoreside infrastructure, seafood promotion, and managing highly migratory species such as bluefin tuna.

Projects the Bill Would Fund

Under the new bill, several types of programs would be eligible for funding, among them:

  • Fish stock assessments and analyses, including cooperative surveys involving fishermen and scientists;
  • Data collection for recreational fisheries;
  • Testing and deployment of environmentally friendly fishing gear,
  • Dockside, at-sea, and electronic monitoring and reporting of catch;
  • Assistance to, and investments in, fishermen and their communities;
  • Socioeconomic research, and
  • Habitat restoration and protection.

In other words, the FIRRA would support the scientific research and improved management necessary to help maintain healthy oceans. It would also provide much-needed assistance to coastal communities, ultimately increasing fishing opportunities for everyone in the long run.

 

Related Stories:

The Bottom Line: Tracking Tuna in the Cloud

World’s Largest Tuna Conservation Coalition Bans Shark Finning

Getting Serious About Illegal Tuna Fishing in the Mediterranean

 

Read more: , , , , , , , ,

Photo: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

38 comments

+ add your own
1:35PM PDT on May 5, 2012

Grazie per l'articolo.

10:09PM PDT on Apr 28, 2012

Investing sensitively, wisely and sustainably!

2:34AM PDT on Mar 22, 2012

Good idea...but we need more promotion of the right fish to eat - I'm avoiding all Tuna now and "flake" or shark and several others - IN Aust we are expanding fish farms with big problems - antibiotic overdose,the effect on local water pollution and the massive reliance on fish food pellets that use so much whales and seals need..
A complex system and we think we can just do waht we like - as usual ...

2:16AM PDT on Mar 21, 2012

Sounds like a responsible bill :)

1:50AM PDT on Mar 21, 2012

Thanks

8:20PM PDT on Mar 20, 2012

Reality dictates that, as a resource, we use the oceans wisely. They do cover the majority of the planet. We need the nutrients from fish, sea vegetation, and water to restore and fuel the coming organic revolution. People gotta eat.

8:16PM PDT on Mar 20, 2012

Establishing marine preserves that spare fish populations from all human pressure should be the first step. There are just too many people. I rarely eat fish anymore because they are already so depleted. Our soils are depleted. Our air and water fouled. We have tipped the balance of the planet in too many ways - it's not 'the Eleventh Hour' - it's One AM! And yet we lust for $2.50 gallons of gas. Stupid people - stupid Pope.

3:14PM PDT on Mar 20, 2012

If fishermen are involved then I don't trust this idea. Fishermen 'managing' our oceans is like hunters 'managing' our animals, or loggers 'managing' our forests, or foxes 'managing' our chickens.

2:00PM PDT on Mar 20, 2012

thanks

1:37PM PDT on Mar 20, 2012

Good article

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Breakfast shouldn't be about loosing weight, it's about giving the body & brain a good start-up so…

OMG!!!!!! WHAT A SWEET HEART PICOLINO!!!!!!! THNX FOR THE VEDEO

Don V. If you had a point, it got lost in a sea of redundant phrases. Would you like to try again?…

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.