START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good

The ‘No More Solyndras Act’

The ‘No More Solyndras Act’
  • 1 of 2


Written by Richard W. Caperton

Imagine a government program that had produced dozens of success stories, cost less than expected, and helped build an industry of the future. Wouldn’t you want to expand that program?  Yes, you probably would.  Unless, of course, you were Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-FL).

If you were Rep. Cliff Stearns, you would introduce legislation to end the program.  And, if the program somehow did survive, your legislation would make sure that it operated with more bureaucratic red tape and weaker financial standing.

Welcome to the bizarre politics around the Department of Energy Loan Guarantee Program. Today, two subcommittees of the House Energy and Commerce Committee will consider a piece of legislation written by Stearns called the “No More Solyndras Act.”  Every aspect of this bill is bad. If Congress really wants to improve the loan guarantee program, they should do so by allowing it to fund many more projects with a full portfolio of financial tools. Let’s look at why.

The Loan Guarantee Program has been a success

First, some background. DOE’s loan guarantee program was created in the Energy Policy Act of 2005, and was strengthened in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (the stimulus bill). The program is built to provide financing to new clean energy technologies that the private sector is unable to finance.  These companies are trying to cross the “Valley of Death,” where they need many millions — even billions — of dollars to build new projects.  Traditional lenders won’t finance these projects because they’re generally the first-of-a-kind, and venture capitalists who would finance innovative projects simply don’t have enough money to meet these companies’ needs.  So, the government stepped in and guaranteed that they’ll pay back a loan if the company is unable to.  This guarantee unlocks capital.

The program has been an overwhelming success.  The loan guarantee program alone financed 32 projects in more than 20 states, ultimately creating 22,000 jobs directly. Best of all, the government only spent $2.5 billion to mobilize more than $20 billion in private capital.

Even projects without guarantees have benefited from the process. For example, the due diligence process helped bring in a $1 billion investment from Bank of America for the largest residential solar project in U.S. history. The chief executive officer of the solar company deploying the project said that without the due diligence process to attract private lenders, “We would not have been able to make the economics of this project work.”

Enter the “No More Solyndras Act”: A potential disaster

Despite the fact that the Title XVII loan guarantee program has been a success and should be expanded, Rep. Stearns’ legislation would effectively end the program, mandate unnecessary and duplicate consultations, and tie the government’s hands behind when it’s representing taxpayers.

The “No More Solyndras Act” does three main things:

1. It sets a retrospective deadline by which applications must have been received in order to be considered for loan guarantees. No application that was submitted after December 31, 2011, is eligible for a new guarantee.

2. It creates a new process for the Secretary of the Treasury to influence the outcome of a decision on a guarantee, and requires the Secretary of Energy to explain why he or she did or did not follow Treasury’s recommendation.

3. It says that taxpayers must always be the senior debt holder, even after a restructuring of a guarantee for a troubled company.

    Each of these is a mistake.

    • 1 of 2

    Read more: , , , , ,

    Photo (first page): republicanconference/flickr; Photo (second page): zachgraham/flickr

    quick poll

    vote now!

    Loading poll...

    have you shared this story yet?

    some of the best people we know are doing it


    + add your own
    3:42PM PDT on Sep 18, 2012


    2:19PM PDT on Sep 18, 2012

    Remember to VOTE in November.


    9:59AM PDT on Sep 18, 2012

    Thank you for sharing.

    1:06AM PDT on Jul 16, 2012

    Dr C, your last post was more than star worthy.

    What you said about the Republicans abandoning our founding principles is exactly correct. I don't know how they fool even some of the people, some of the time, they are so obvious.

    From my earliest days on the internet I encountered sneaky, obviously paid right wing trolls. They often hid their identity and claimed to be Democrats or even liberal minded. They are all around us. But they betray their identity if you watch long enough.

    8:39PM PDT on Jul 15, 2012

    Guys and Gals, Solyndra was the dumbest application of solar technology that I have ever seen, sorry, that is not entirely true. There have been others, just not subsidized by Congress.

    To utilize Solyndra technology would require a roof of huge proportions, the numbers to not compute.

    At the end of the day, Obummer and Congress need to get out of the way and create a comptroller group, not composed of insiders (Washington Insiders), but the American working class.

    By the way, I have been in the Solar business for many years, my home has been solar and wind powered for 30 years. Do I have view as to the poroblem?

    9:55AM PDT on Jul 14, 2012

    As a registered "independent" , there is the benefit in a latitude to cherry pick wisdom from the founding principals of Republican, Democratic, Libertarian or other parties.

    Of late it would seem though that the Republican party is operating far afield from those times when the interplay between the major Democratic and Republican parties in championing their foundations provided for a check and balance that in their mixed views affected a more even keel in the results.

    Government is meant to be by the people and for the people , and while both parties have succumbed to undue corporate influence , in the case of the Republicans such influence has not only been embraced , but has all but totally displaced their ability to put the electorate before the corporate , thus leaving their founding principals as but tatters on the trading room floor.

    8:49AM PDT on Jul 14, 2012

    Thank you Dave C., for identifying the source of the problem. If only we could find a sponsor for his No More Republican Politicians bill... We need to create a mantra (short enough for Re-bubba-cans to understand) that we repeat every time they go nutso over renewables. It should include the fact that the Pentagon (yeah, the same military/ industrial complex that these dimwits WORSHIP) takes global warming very seriously, and any industry would THRIVE if given half the subsidies that oil and gas get. Come on, folks -let's come up with a bumper sticker worthy aphorism that we can repeat, and then sit back and watch their heads explode... additional benefit? more health care for the rest of us!

    4:50AM PDT on Jul 14, 2012


    2:07AM PDT on Jul 14, 2012

    If nothing else, Germany is absolute proof that solar energy DOES work. While they receive a lot less sunlight (smaller country means smaller area of land to receive the sunlight), the German government has subsidized their solar program and it produces a LOT more than America's program does. They're literally doing more with less. Granted, Solyndra failed. There's no question of that. Basing an entire industry on a single company is absolutely foolish.

    12:16AM PDT on Jul 14, 2012

    Exactly James. The stupid have elected the crazy. Mittens had a couple of Solyndras of his own but it didn't stop his mouth from flapping. The only reason they didn't do well was that China came in and undercut the prices as they always do. They also charge 20% on imports which we don't do and should.

    add your comment

    Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
    Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

    Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
    ads keep care2 free

    Recent Comments from Causes

    I work listening 4 dogs barking all day long.. it´s really hard.. people think a dog will play…

    Losing Forest Carbon Sink by wildfires can be lessened by grazing animals keeping the forest floor thinned…

    ads keep care2 free

    Select names from your address book   |   Help

    We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.