START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,282,913 people care about Politics

The Racist History Behind The Repeal The 17th Amendment Movement

The Racist History Behind The Repeal The 17th Amendment Movement

There is nothing more American, more democratic, than the ability to directly elect our officials. So naturally, Republicans want to do away with it by repealing the Seventeenth Amendment.

In fact, repealing the Seventeenth Amendment, the constitutional amendment that guarantees voters the right to elect their own senators, has become almost as popular among the right as privatizing social security and defunding Planned Parenthood. The current list of supporters includes Rep. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) who is currently campaigning to replace retiring Sen. John Kyl (R-AZ), Indiana Senate candidate Richard Mourdock, Missouri Senate Candidate Rep. Todd Akin, former Michigan Rep. Pete Hoekstra, Texas Gov. Rick Perry, Sen. Mike Lee and Justice Antonin Scalia all pine for the day when corrupt state legislatures picked their Senators.

The argument the hard-right advances for the elimination of the 17th Amendment is, of course, a state’s rights argument. Last November, Hoekstra told a conservative talk radio program on WAAM in Ann Arbor that allowing people to elect their own Senators weakened the power of the states relative to the federal government. “The direct election of U.S. Senators made the U.S. Senate act and behave like the House of Representatives,” Hoekstra said. “The end result has led to an erosion of states’ rights.”

According to those who support the repeal, the framers of the Constitution intended the Senate to be answerable to the states and to serve on a check of federal power that would naturally expand as a result of the direct election of representatives to the U.S. House of Representatives.

What supporters of repeal largely leave out is that prior to the 17th Amendment, the appointment of senators was one way the slave-holding and then later segregationist South maintained political power. And, the direct appointment of Senators was seen as one of the compromises necessary to get the slave-holding South to sign on to the Constitution since it would assure their less-populous states would have just as much say in the Senate as the free states in the North.

The move to pass the 17th Amendment was a direct response to a national desire to drive out that racist element from our political process and to keep, as much as possible, direct say in the governance of the people in the hands of the people. Not only was the direct election of Senators via the 17th Amendment a success of the progressive era, so to was the 19th Amendment which recognized a woman’s right to vote.

No wonder the Tea Party, our modern day recreation of the privileged slaveholding South sees the 17th Amendment as such a threat. I wonder how long until they openly move on to challenging the 19th as well?

Related Stories:

Can The Tea Party Clean Up Its Racist Act?

A 99% White Party Is Bad For Republicans And For America

Read more: , , , , ,

Photo from vectorportal via flickr.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

127 comments

+ add your own
5:23PM PDT on Oct 15, 2014

we've had direct popular vote for almost 100 years now and what has it got us. Larger out of control federal Govt., unresponsive elected senators who only care about themselves and the power they control. They are all controlled by special interests and their intent to represent their people of their state is tainted in many ways.. I think the framers of the constitution were smart to have senators not elected, but appointed. They were suppose to represent the state without pressure from the popular vote. If they sucked we could remove them and put someone else in. 6 years is a long time to be in office,. This would increase states rights over the federal govt and be more representative to the peoples concerns.

5:23PM PDT on Oct 15, 2014

we've had direct popular vote for almost 100 years now and what has it got us. Larger out of control federal Govt., unresponsive elected senators who only care about themselves and the power they control. They are all controlled by special interests and their intent to represent their people of their state is tainted in many ways.. I think the framers of the constitution were smart to have senators not elected, but appointed. They were suppose to represent the state without pressure from the popular vote. If they sucked we could remove them and put someone else in. 6 years is a long time to be in office,. This would increase states rights over the federal govt and be more representative to the peoples concerns.

5:23PM PDT on Oct 15, 2014

we've had direct popular vote for almost 100 years now and what has it got us. Larger out of control federal Govt., unresponsive elected senators who only care about themselves and the power they control. They are all controlled by special interests and their intent to represent their people of their state is tainted in many ways.. I think the framers of the constitution were smart to have senators not elected, but appointed. They were suppose to represent the state without pressure from the popular vote. If they sucked we could remove them and put someone else in. 6 years is a long time to be in office,. This would increase states rights over the federal govt and be more representative to the peoples concerns.

5:23PM PDT on Oct 15, 2014

we've had direct popular vote for almost 100 years now and what has it got us. Larger out of control federal Govt., unresponsive elected senators who only care about themselves and the power they control. They are all controlled by special interests and their intent to represent their people of their state is tainted in many ways.. I think the framers of the constitution were smart to have senators not elected, but appointed. They were suppose to represent the state without pressure from the popular vote. If they sucked we could remove them and put someone else in. 6 years is a long time to be in office,. This would increase states rights over the federal govt and be more representative to the peoples concerns.

5:23PM PDT on Oct 15, 2014

we've had direct popular vote for almost 100 years now and what has it got us. Larger out of control federal Govt., unresponsive elected senators who only care about themselves and the power they control. They are all controlled by special interests and their intent to represent their people of their state is tainted in many ways.. I think the framers of the constitution were smart to have senators not elected, but appointed. They were suppose to represent the state without pressure from the popular vote. If they sucked we could remove them and put someone else in. 6 years is a long time to be in office,. This would increase states rights over the federal govt and be more representative to the peoples concerns.

5:23PM PDT on Oct 15, 2014

we've had direct popular vote for almost 100 years now and what has it got us. Larger out of control federal Govt., unresponsive elected senators who only care about themselves and the power they control. They are all controlled by special interests and their intent to represent their people of their state is tainted in many ways.. I think the framers of the constitution were smart to have senators not elected, but appointed. They were suppose to represent the state without pressure from the popular vote. If they sucked we could remove them and put someone else in. 6 years is a long time to be in office,. This would increase states rights over the federal govt and be more representative to the peoples concerns.

5:23PM PDT on Oct 15, 2014

we've had direct popular vote for almost 100 years now and what has it got us. Larger out of control federal Govt., unresponsive elected senators who only care about themselves and the power they control. They are all controlled by special interests and their intent to represent their people of their state is tainted in many ways.. I think the framers of the constitution were smart to have senators not elected, but appointed. They were suppose to represent the state without pressure from the popular vote. If they sucked we could remove them and put someone else in. 6 years is a long time to be in office,. This would increase states rights over the federal govt and be more representative to the peoples concerns.

11:04AM PDT on Sep 26, 2012

we're still suffering from Gov. Perry in Texas.

11:03AM PDT on Sep 26, 2012

As an American citizen, I have the right to choose elected officials and I will fight anyone trying to take that right away.

7:48PM PDT on Sep 7, 2012

all offices in the government should be voted on by the people not the special interests. as well as continuing to elect the senators we should do away with the electoral college and elect our president on the popular vote.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free
CONTACT THE EDITORS

Recent Comments from Causes

A list of animal tested free products would be helpful. These bunnies will adapt, all it takes is…

meet our writers

Kathleen J. Kathleen is currently the Activism Coordinator at Care2. more
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.