START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
1,466,046 people care about Politics

Thoughts on Gun Control (Infographic)

Thoughts on Gun Control (Infographic)


Today, in the wake of the tragic shooting in Aurora, Colorado, one Republican representative from Texas posed the question, could the shooter have been stopped earlier if someone in the movie theater were carrying a concealed firearms?

This is Care2′s response to his question.


Related Stories:

GOP Rep: Aurora Shooting an Attack on ‘Judeo-Christian Beliefs’

Gun Violence A Public Health Problem

Carelessness, Callousness, Chauvinism Create Worst Reactions to Shooting


Read more: , , , , , ,

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
10:46AM PST on Dec 7, 2014


4:10AM PDT on Oct 30, 2014

This is one of the most important blogs that I have seen, keep it up!

9:45AM PDT on Jul 20, 2014

Why must all decent non-violent people fight against "gun control"? Why is the right to keep and bear arms truly a fundamental individual right? You can find the answers in this new book.

People frequently ask why we are so dedicated to our cause? This book answers that question by collecting the key facts and arguments in one place.

People have asked us to present the whole JPFO argument in one place. We have done it. Available now in an easy-reading format and a handy size, the new book is entitled Death by Gun Control: The Human Cost of Victim Disarmament.

The message is simple: Disarmed people are neither free nor safe - they become the criminals' prey and the tyrants' playthings. When the civilians are defenseless and their government goes bad, however, thousands and millions of innocents die.

Professor R.J. Rummel, author of the monumental book Death by Government, said: "Concentrated political power is the most dangerous thing on earth." For power to concentrate and become dangerous, the citizens must be disarmed.

What disarms the citizens? The idea of "gun control." It's the idea that only the government has the right to possess firearms, and that citizens have no unalienable right to use force to defend against aggression.

Death by Gun Control carefully examines the "gun control" idea: its meaning, its purposes, its effects. It comes in many forms, but in every form it enables the evildoers and works against righteous defense.

3:54AM PDT on May 2, 2014

It is no weapons at homes are preferable to create spoil situation.
best self defence 9mm ammo

4:09PM PST on Jan 10, 2013

5:02 the latest correction and maybe the last to my thought at this time on gun control may be a distraction. There are other issues: how to uproot the causes of the misuse and the use of weapons in the first place???
Do we remember the fight for freedom and the steps to downfall that took place before the natzi's tried to take over in world war two?
correction. Are we pawns in a behind the scenes system that would like people to think that they do not have to defend them selves and their loved ones -- from people who could and would if they could get these weapons -- and defend themselves and others from -- A partly good and partly excellent government system-- if the government turns against the civilians?
Do we remember the fight for freedom and the steps to downfall that took place before the natzi's tried to take over in world war two?
If I was about to get shot any where -- by some person who either planned it, or did not -- I sure would be grateful if some other person {without getting injured and without getting killed} stopped that gun from from going off. Guns are not the only kind of weapons that I would need to be defended from.
The real useful conversation is about how to keep people happy, whole, healthy and sane -- so that people will not

2:08AM PST on Dec 25, 2012


1:22PM PST on Dec 17, 2012

Assault weapons are specifically designed to kill as many PEOPLE as possible in a short period of time. Yet when somebody actually uses the gun for it's intended purpose we act shocked.

10:51AM PDT on Aug 2, 2012

Beth, I don't recall saying anything about being fearful: my weapon is near, but not clutched in my hand as I sleep. As for my ... physical attributes, I'll just say that my fiancée (who is 20 years my junior) is happy, and leave it at that. As for your other question, I'm retired Special Warfare and was involved in both Grenada and Desert Storm.

Guns are like condoms and fire extinguishers. Better to have and not need than need and not have.

3:13AM PDT on Aug 2, 2012

concluding earlier post:
Besides pro gun people having a better grasp on reality and generally a much larger amount of common sense than anti-gun nuts, do you know what the difference is between our two groups Beth? We gun people don't say that guns are for everybody and we are not trying to force gun ownership and use upon anyone that doesn't want it whereas anti-gun nuts are more than happy to try and destroy that gun ownership and use for everyone bar none except for those hypocrites within your group who feel that your BS doesn't not apply to them. Everything else to the side: history, the law, actual facts and stats of gun ownership, carry, and use, it comes down to this: either you believe in self-defense or you don't. Anti-gun nuts clearly don't and they don't believe in it for because of a host of foolish and false ideas that ultimately come down to irrational fear on their part. Anti-gun nuts like to accuse pro gun people of paranoia but it is they who suffer from it. Posts such as yours prove it time and time again.

3:12AM PDT on Aug 2, 2012

Beth K.-"Matt B, your argument that it will not deter criminals to control gun sales, could be followed to the logical conclusion, that there is no use passing any laws."

Beth the word logic and any variant of it has no real connection to the anti-gun nut side of things. My argument as you put it does not have the conclusion that there is no use in passing laws. The logical conclusion of my argument is that basing criminality on the mere existence and ownership and/or use of a simple tool is both foolish and illegal (2nd Amendment Rights and all) where guns are concerned. My owning and carrying of a gun outside of work (I happen to be a cop) equals crime the same way that my buying and drinking of beer equals drunk driving as I happen to own a car as well. One does not automatically follow the other in the real world. In the world of gun nuts of course things are somehow different. In that twisted reality guns can and do kill people all by themselves, and when they are not doing that they are whispering in people's ears like a little devil on their shoulder convincing them to do evil. In the anti-gun nut world guns cause accidents and murders and no good ever has nor ever will come from their ownership and use except of course possibly by an anti-gun nut themselves because in their world they are smarter, better, more capable people than normal human beings and most especially those who support gun ownership and use for everyone. Besides pro gun people having a better gras

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

meet our writers

Beth Buczynski Beth is a freelance writer and editor living in the Rocky Mountain West. So far, Beth has lived in... more
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.