START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good

“War Against D.C. Drivers” is Much Ado About Nothing

“War Against D.C. Drivers” is Much Ado About Nothing

Note: This is a guest post from Paul Goddin, an urban planner and Mobility Lab consultant based in Washington D.C. This post was originally published on Mobility Labís blog.

A recent headline in Washington D.C.’s Examiner newspaper raged, “D.C. Waging War Against Drivers.” It cited the District’s Sustainable DC plan, released February 20 by Mayor Vincent Gray, as an example of how this “war” starts at the top.

While the Examiner’s headline was full of sound and fury, the article’s content was, in the end, to paraphrase Shakespeare, much ado about nothing.

To be fair, the Examiner isn’t alone in using this kind of incendiary rhetoric when it comes to cities enhancing streets to make them more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly. NPR weighed in on the issue in a radio segment, noting how the term “war on cars” has been used in places such as Seattle to describe implementation of even the most benign pedestrian safety measures such as reductions in speed limits.

It is true that urban design philosophies currently favor walkable places over those designed around the automobile. It is true also that traffic is a zero-sum game (if you’re winning, someone else must be losing), so some amount of fervor from D.C. drivers over the reapportioning of the District’s streets is to be expected.

But the move towards walkability is not an agenda being pushed by policy makers down the throats of an unwilling populace, as the Examiner seems to suggest, but is in fact a response to market demand. Chris Leinberger of the George Washington University School of Business has described in his report The WalkUP Wake-Up Call that consumer demand for walkability was a trend that began 20 years ago, and is only gaining momentum today.

Yes, the market demands walkability, and the market, in case it is unclear, refers to you and me. Consumers prefer walkable urban places, and display this preference in the willingness to pay higher rents to live in them (in some places, enormous amounts more). For instance, in Washington D.C.’s Dupont Circle neighborhood (pictured), residential rents average $3.03 per square foot per month, twice that paid in comparable automobile-dependent locations.

Not all of us are so lucky to be able to afford to live in the Clarendons, Bethesdas, or Dupont Circles of the D.C. region. Unaffordable prices, absent regulation, are the natural consequence of any supply-demand disparity, and Leinberger has stated that the best way to tackle unaffordable housing in walkable urban places is to address the supply side of the equation Ė to create more walkable urban places.

Given this free market-based lens through which to view the region, the District’s street enhancements and Sustainable DC initiative can be viewed as an environmental or health-based program in its attempt to reduce the number of cars on D.C. streets. But it can also be viewed as an attempt to give the market what it demands: more livable, walkable neighborhoods that are not simply designed as places to drive through.

So what do you think? Should D.C. (and other cities) continue to pursue a more walkable, livable strategy of building lots of active neighborhoods, or should the priority be to maximize vehicle throughput on the city’s major automobile traffic arteries?


Related Stories:

Mandatory Bike Helmet Laws Could Make Streets Less Safe

Cities For A Clean Air Future

What Itís Like To Live in a City Without Cars


Read more: , , , ,

Photo from Mobility Lab by M.V. Jantzen

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
11:30AM PDT on Mar 21, 2013

thanks for sharing

10:58AM PDT on Mar 20, 2013

Thank you for Sharing

12:35AM PDT on Mar 17, 2013


11:32PM PDT on Mar 16, 2013

I really like a walkable neighborhood and strongly promote good public transportation. Both of which are lacking where I now reside.

I wish I had thought of it more when I was looking at houses to buy.

8:35PM PDT on Mar 16, 2013

Interesting article.

2:27AM PDT on Mar 16, 2013


1:43AM PDT on Mar 16, 2013

thanks for the article

11:51AM PDT on Mar 15, 2013

Interesting post.Thanks for sharing

8:48AM PDT on Mar 15, 2013


5:59AM PDT on Mar 15, 2013

Thanks for the info.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

My question for her is has she ever issued a marriage license for a couple where at least one of the…

Did she take an oath, sworn to some god to uphold the laws? If so then she is in big doo doo with that…

How is this hateful bigot being taken seriously? If a person refuses to fulful the duties they're paid…

meet our writers

Steve Williams Steve Williams is a passionate supporter of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) rights, human... more
ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!